Which barriers affect morbidity registration performance of GP trainees and trainers?

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 82, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 708-716

  De Jong, Jip ^a   Visser, Mechteld R M ^a   Wieringa de Waard, Margreet ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Electronic health records; General practitioners; Graduate medical education; Medical informatics; Primary care

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; ELECTRONIC PATIENT RECORD; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PRIMARY CARE; REGISTRATION PERFORMANCE; UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM;

MEDICAL EDUCATION; MOTIVATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SURVEYS; TELEPHONE SETS;

TELEPHONE;

ARTICLE; CODING; DATA EXTRACTION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT; TELECONSULTATION;

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PRIMARY CARE;

CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL CODING; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; HUMANS; MORBIDITY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84880046760     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Gardner M. Why clinical information standards matter. BMJ 2003, 326(7399):1101-1102.
2. van der Linden M.W., Westert G.P., de Bakker D.H., Schellevis F.G. Second National Study into Diseases and Actions in General Practice 2004, Dutch Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht and National Institute of Public Health and Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven.
3. Sigmundsdottir G., Gudnason T., Olafsson O., Baldvinsdottir G.E., Atladottir A., Löve A., et al. Surveillance of influenza in Iceland during the 2009 pandemic. Euro Surveill. 2010, 15(December (49)).
4. Blozik E., Grandchamp C., von Overbeck J. Influenza surveillance using data from a telemedicine centre. Int. J. Pulic Health 2012, 57(April (2)):447-452.
5. Boffin N., Bossuyt N., Vanthomme K., van Casteren V. Readiness of the Belgian network of sentinel general practitioners to deliver electronic health record data for surveillance purposes: results of survey study. BMC Fam. Pract. 2010, 11(1):50.
6. Holroyd-Leduc J.M., Lorenzetti D., Straus S.E., Sykes L., Quan H. The impact of the electronic medical record on structure, process, and outcomes within primary care: a systematic review of the evidence. JAMIA 2011, 18(November (6)):732-737.
7. Ahmadian L., van Engen-Verheul M., Bakhshi-Raiez F., Peek N., Cornet R., de Keizer N.F. The role of standardized data and terminological systems in computerized clinical decision support systems: literature review and survey. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2011, 80(February (2)):81-93.
8. Crosson J.C., Etz R.S., Wu S., Straus S.G., Eisenman D., Bell D.S. Meaningful use of electronic prescribing in 5 exemplar primary care practices. Ann. Fam. Med. 2011, 9(September (5)):392-397.
9. Persell S.D., Kaiser D., Dolan N.C., Andrews B., Levi S., Khandekar J., et al. Changes in performance after implementation of a multifaceted electronic-health-record-based quality improvement system. Med. Care 2011, 49(February (2)):117-125.
10. Hak E., van Essen G.A., Stalman W.A., de Melker R.A. Improving influenza vaccination coverage among high-risk patients: a role for computer-supported prevention strategy?. Fam. Pract. 1998, 15(April (2)):138-143.
11. de Jong J., Visser M.R.M., Mohrs J., Wieringa-de Waard M. Opening the black box: the patient mix of GP trainees. BJGP 2011, October (61):e650-e657.
12. Vintges M., Van Weert H., Wiele E., Mohrs J., Brouwer H.J., Wigersma L. What health problems do trainees in general practice see? Data from electronic patient records compared with the 'qualification terms' of the Dutch vocational training for general practitioners. Huisarts Wet. 2001, 44(October):485-489.
13. Thiru K., Hassey A., Sullivan F. Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care. BMJ 2003, 326(7398):1070.
14. Porcheret M., Hughes R., Evans D., Jordan K., Whitehurst T., Ogden H., et al. Data quality of general practice electronic health records: the impact of a program of assessments, feedback, and training. JAMIA 2004, 11(1):78-86.
15. Hassey A., Gerrett D., Wilson A. A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice. BMJ 2001, 322(June (7299)):1401-1405.
16. Pringle M., Ward P., Chilvers C. Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer. BJGP 1995, 45(October (399)):537-541.
17. Britt H., Angelis M., Harris E. The reliability and validity of doctor-recorded morbidity data in active data collection systems. Scand. J. Prim. Health Care 1998, 16(March (1)):50-55.
18. Khan N.F., Harrison S.E., Rose P.W. Validity of diagnostic coding within the general practice research database: a systematic review. BJGP 2010, 60(March (572)):e128-e136.
19. Stausberg J., Lehmann N., Kaczmarek D., Stein M. Reliability of diagnoses coding with ICD-10. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2008, 77(January (1)):50-57.
20. Jordan K., Porcheret M., Croft P. Quality of morbidity coding in general practice computerized medical records: a systematic review. Fam. Pract. 2004, 21(4):396-412.
21. de Lusignan S. The barriers to clinical coding in general practice: a literature review. Med. Inform. Internet 2005, 30(June (2)):89-97.
22. Miller R.H., Sim I. Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff. (Millwood) 2004, 23(March (2)):116-126.
23. Lamberts H., Wood M. The birth of the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC). Serendipity at the border of Lac Leman. Fam. Pract. 2002, 19(5):433-435.
24. International Classification of Primary Care 1987, Oxford University Press, Oxford. H. Lamberts, M. Wood (Eds.).
25. Botsis T., Bassoe C.F., Hartvigsen G. Sixteen years of ICPC use in Norwegian primary care: looking through the facts. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2010, 10:11.
26. Otters H.B., van der Wouden J.C., Schellevis F.G., van Suijlekom-Smit L.W., Koes B.W. Changing morbidity patterns in children in Dutch general practice: 1987-2001. Eur. J Gen. Pract. 2005, 11(March (1)):17-22.
27. Laux G., Kuehlein T., Rosemann T., Szecsenyi J. Co- and multimorbidity patterns in primary care based on episodes of care: results from the German CONTENT project. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2008, 8:14.
28. Patricoski C.T., Shannon K., Doyle G.A. The accuracy of patient encounter logbooks used by family medicine clerkship students. Fam. Med. 1998, 30(July (7)):487-489.
29. Nkoy F.L., Petersen S., Antommaria A.H., Maloney C.G. Validation of an electronic system for recording medical student patient encounters. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2008, 510-514.
30. de Jong J., Visser M.R.M., Wieringa-de Waard M. Exploring differences in patient mix in a cohort of GP trainees and their trainers. BMJ Open 2011, 1:e000318. 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-0003182011.
31. Denton G.D., DeMott C., Pangaro L.N., Hemmer P.A. Narrative review: use of student-generated logbooks in undergraduate medical education. Teach. Learn. Med. 2006, 18(2):153-164.
32. Meade B., Buckley D., Boland M. What factors affect the use of electronic patient records by Irish GPs?. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2009, 78(August (8)):551-558.
33. de Jong J., Visser M.R., Wieringa-de Waard M. Steering the patient mix of GP trainees: results of a randomized controlled intervention. Med. Teach. 2013, 35:101-108.
34. de Lusignan S., Stephens P.N., Adal N., Majeed A. Does feedback improve the quality of computerized medical records in primary care?. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2002, 9:395-401.
35. de Lusignan S., Wells S.E., Hague N.J., Thiru K. Managers see the problems associated with coding clinical data as a technical issue whilst clinicians also see cultural barriers. Methods Inf. Med. 2003, 42(4):416-422.
36. Finkelstein J., Lapshin O. Reducing depression stigma using a web-based program. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2007, 76(October (10)):726-734.
37. Allaert F.A., Le Teuff G., Quantin C., Barber B. The legal acknowledgement of the electronic signature: a key for a secure direct access of patients to their computerised medical record. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2004, 73(March (3)):239-242.
38. Croll P.R. Determining the privacy policy deficiencies of health ICT applications through semi-formal modelling. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2011, 80(February (2)):e32-e38.
39. van der Haak M., Wolff A.C., Brandner R., Drings P., Wannenmacher M., Wetter T. Data security and protection in cross-institutional electronic patient records. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2003, 70(July (2-3)):117-130.
40. Pharow P., Blobel B. Electronic signatures for long-lasting storage purposes in electronic archives. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2005, 74(March (2-4)):279-287.
41. Anderson J.G. Social, ethical and legal barriers to E-health. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2007, 76(May (5-6)):480-483.
42. Tolar M., Balka E. Caring for individual patients and beyond: enhancing care through secondary use of data in a general practice setting. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2012, 81(July (7)):461-474.
43. Balas E.A., Austin S.M., Mitchell J.A., Ewigman B.G., Bopp K.D., Brown G.D. The clinical value of computerized information services: a review of 98 randomized clinical trials. Arch. Fam. Med. 1996, 5(May (5)):271-278.
44. Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG), Adequate record keeping in electronic patient records (ADEPD), Utrecht, 2009.