Data Quality of General Practice Electronic Health Records: The Impact of a Program of Assessments, Feedback, and Training

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 78-86

  Porcheret, Mark ^a   Hughes, Rhian ^a   Evans, Dai ^a   Jordan, Kelvin ^a   Whitehurst, Tracy ^a   Ogden, Helen ^a   Croft, Peter ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TAMOXIFEN;

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CALCULATION; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MORBIDITY; RECORDING; TRAINING;

EID: 0345791497     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1362     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. NHS Executive. Information for Health: An Information Strategy for the Modern NHS 1998-2005. A National Strategy for Local Implementation. London: Department of Health, 1998.
2. Mant D, Tulloch A. Completeness of chronic disease registration in general practice. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 1987;294:223-4.
3. Pringle M, Ward P, Chilvers C. Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer. Br J Gen Pract. 1995;45:537-41.
4. Scobie S, Basnett I, McCartney P. Can general practice data be used for needs assessment and health care planning in an inner-London district? J Public Health Med. 1995;17:475-83.
5. Hassey A, Gerrett D, Wilson A. A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice. BMJ. 2001;322:1401-5.
6. Pearson N, O'Brien J, Thomas H, Ewings P, Gallier L, Bussey A. Collecting morbidity data in general practice: the Somerset morbidity project. BMJ. 1996;312:1517-20.
7. Thiru K, de Lusignan S, Hague N. Have the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in general practice improved in the last five years? The report of a two-practice pilot study. Health Informatics Journal. 1999;5:224-32.
8. Coulter A, Brown S, Daniels A. Computer held chronic disease registers in general practice: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1989;43:25-8.
9. Bottomley A. Methodology for assessing the prevalence of angina in primary care using practice based information in northern England. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997;51:87-9.
10. Hollowell J. The general practice research database: quality of morbidity data. Population Trends. 1997;87:36-40.
11. Thiru K, Hassey A, Sullivan F. Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care. BMJ. 2003;326:1070-2.
12. Chisholm J. The Read clinical classification. BMJ. 1990;300:1092.
13. Royal College of General Practitioners, Office of Population Census and Surveys, and Department of Health. Morbidity Statistics from General Practice Fourth National Study 1991-1992. London: HMSO, 1995.
14. SPSS for Windows, Rel.10.0.7. Chicago: SPSS Inc, 2000.
15. Gilliland A, Mills K, Steels K. General Practitioner records on computer-handle with care. Family Practice. 1992;9:441-50.
16. de Lugsignan S, Stephens P, Adal N, Majeed A. Does feedback improve the quality of computerized medical records in primary care? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9:395-401.