The usefulness of patient-reported measures for clinical practice

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 132, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 105-112

  Van Vliet, Michael M ^a   Maradey, Johann A ^a   Homa, Karen A ^a   Kerrigan, Carolyn L ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SELF REPORT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SELF REPORT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84879985783     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318290fa55     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Descatha A, Dale AM, Franzblau A, Coomes J, Evanoff B. Diagnostic strategies using physical examination are minimally useful in defining carpal tunnel syndrome in population-based research studies. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67:133-135.
2. Mondelli M, Passero S, Giannini F. Provocative tests in different stages of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2001;103:178-183.
3. Katz JN, Larson MG, Sabra A, et al. The carpal tunnel syndrome: Diagnostic utility of the history and physical examination findings. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:321-327.
4. Ansari NN, Adelmanesh F, Naghdi S, Mousavi S. The relationship between symptoms, clinical tests and nerve conduction study findings in carpal tunnel syndrome. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;49:53-57.
5. Kuhlman KA, Hennessey WJ. Sensitivity and specificity of carpal tunnel syndrome signs. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;76:451-457.
6. Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1585-1592.
7. Ollivere BJ, Logan K, Ellahee N, Miller-Jones JC, Wood M, Nairn DS. Severity scoring in carpal tunnel syndrome helps predict the value of conservative therapy. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009;34:511-515.
8. Sambandam SN, Priyanka P, Gul A, Ilango B. Critical analysis of outcome measures used in the assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Int Orthop. 2008;32:497-504.
9. Gay RE, Amadio PC, Johnson JC. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28:250-254.
10. Dias JJ, Rajan RA, Thompson Jr. Which questionnaire is best? The reliability, validity and ease of use of the Patient Evaluation Measure, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and the Michigan Hand Outcome Measure. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008;33:9-17.
11. Greenslade JR, Mehta RL, Belward P, Warwick DJ. Dash and Boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: What is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire? J Hand Surg Br. 2004;29:159-164.
12. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:128-146.
13. SooHoo NF, McDonald AP, Seiler JG III, McGillivary GR. Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;27:537-541.
14. Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HC. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: A systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:335-341.
15. Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ. Measuring shoulder function: A systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:623-632.
16. Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): Validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:44.
17. Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN; Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: Comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1038-1046.
18. Angst F, Goldhahn J, Drerup S, Flury M, Schwyzer HK, Simmen BR. How sharp is the short QuickDASH? A refined content and validity analysis of the short form of the disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and function and specific joint conditions. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:1043-1051.
19. Gabel CP, Yelland M, Melloh M, Burkett B. A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:161.
20. Mehta S, Macdermid JC, Carlesso LC, McPhee C. Concurrent validation of the DASH and the QuickDASH in comparison to neck-specific scales in patients with neck pain. Spine 2010;35:2150-2156.
21. Niekel MC, Lindenhovius AL, Watson JB, Vranceanu AM, Ring D. Correlation of DASH and QuickDASH with measures of psychological distress. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34:1499-1505.
22. Fan ZJ, Smith CK, Silverstein BA. Responsiveness of the QuickDASH and SF-12 in workers with neck or upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: One-year follow-up. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:234-243.
23. Polson K, Reid D, McNair PJ, Larmer P. Responsiveness, minimal importance difference and minimal detectable change scores of the shortened disability arm shoulder hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire. Man Ther. 2010;15:404-407.
24. Mintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA. Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18:920-926.
25. Wu A, Edgar DW, Wood FM. The QuickDASH is an appropriate tool for measuring the quality of recovery after upper limb burn injury. Burns 2007;33:843-849.
26. Budd HR, Larson D, Chojnowski A, Shepstone L. The QuickDASH score: A patient-reported outcome measure for Dupuytren's surgery. J Hand Ther. 2011;24:15-20; quiz 21.
27. SF Health Surveys. Available at: http://www.qualitymetric. com/WhatWeDo/GenericHealthSurveys/SF8HealthSurvey/tabid/187/Default.aspx. Accessed April 20, 2011.
28. Jester A, Harth A, Wind G, Germann G, Sauerbier M. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire: Determining functional activity profiles in patients with upper extremity disorders. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30:23-28.