Using sheathless standard guiding catheters for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention to treat bifurcation lesions

Experimental and Clinical Cardiology

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 73-76

  Li, Qiyong ^a   He, Yong ^b   Jiang, Rongjian ^a   Huang, Dejia ^b  

^a SICHUAN PROVINCIAL PEOPLE'S HOSPITAL   (China)

^b SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bifurcation lesions; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Radial artery; Sheathless

Indexed keywords

CREATINE KINASE MB; TROPONIN T;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTERY SPASM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CORONARY BIFURCATION LESION; CORONARY STENT; CREATINE KINASE BLOOD LEVEL; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GUIDING CATHETER; HUMAN; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MALE; PATIENT SAFETY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; RADIAL ARTERY; RADIAL ARTERY OCCLUSION; RADIAL ARTERY SPASM; THROMBUS ASPIRATION; VASCULAR ACCESS; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 84879975560     PISSN: 12056626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Brueck M, Bandorski D, Kramer W, Wieczorek M, Höltgen R, Tillmans H. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:1047-54.
2. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009;157:132-40.
3. Dahm JB, van Buuren F. Transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: Indications, success rates & clinical outcome. Indian Heart J 2010;62:218-20.
4. Deftereos S, Giannopoulos G, Tousoulis D, et al. Sheathless transulnar versus standard femoral arterial access for percutaneous coronary intervention on bifurcation lesions. Int J Cardiol 2011;149:398-400.
5. Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999;46:173-8.
6. Mamas MA, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Fraser DG. Atraumatic complex transradial intervention using large bore sheathless guide catheter. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;72:357-64.
7. Cheaito R, Benamer H, Tritar A, et al. Multicentric experience of Sheathless 6.5 French in coronary angioplasty for bifurcation lesions: Feasibility and safety. Ann Cardiol Angiol 2012;61:405-12.
8. Mamas M, D'Souza S, Hendry C, et al. Use of the sheathless guide catheter during routine transradial percutaneous coronary intervention: A feasibility study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;75:596-602.
9. Sciahbasi A, Mancone M, Cortese B, et al. Transradial percutaneous coronary interventions using sheathless guiding catheters: A multicenter registry. J Interv Cardiol 2011;24:407-12.
10. Amoroso G, Laarman GJ, Kiemeneij F. Overview of the transradial approach in percutaneous coronary intervention. J Cardiovasc Med 2007;8:230-7.
11. Dehghani P, Mohammad A, Bajaj R, et al. Mechanism and predictors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:1057-64.
12. Hou L, Wei YD, Li WM, Xu YW. Comparative study on transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction. Saudi Med J 2010;31:158-62.
13. Kozak M, Adams DR, Ioffreda MD, et al. Inflammation associated with transradial catheterization and hydrophilic sheaths. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:207-13.
14. Kwan TW, Cherukuri S, Huang Y, et al. Feasibility and safety of 7F sheathless guiding catheter during transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012;80:274-80.