Transradial percutaneous coronary interventions using sheathless guiding catheters: A multicenter registry

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 407-412

  Sciahbasi, Alessandro ^a   Mancone, Massimo ^b   Cortese, Bernardo ^c   Pendenza, Gianluca ^d   Romagnoli, Enrico ^a   Fischetti, Dionigi ^e   Tomassini, Francesco ^f   Sardella, Gennaro ^a   Lioy, Ernesto ^a  

^a ASL Roma B   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF L'AQUILA   (Italy)

^e VITO FAZZI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^f OSPEDALE DEGLI INFERMI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FIBRINOGEN RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; HIRULOG; NITRATE; VERAPAMIL;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; AGED; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; CATHETER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DILATATION; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; DEVICE; DISEASE REGISTRY; FEMALE; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HUMAN; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIAL ARTERY; SHEATHLESS GUIDING CATHET; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; THROMBECTOMY CATHETER; TRANSRADIAL PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIAL ARTERY; REGISTRIES; THROMBECTOMY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 80054970276     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: 15408183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00663.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GGL, De Benedictis ML, et al,. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 349-356.
2. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, et al,. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009; 157: 132-140.
3. Cooper CJ, El-Shiekh RA, Cohen DJ, et al,. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: A randomised comparison. Am Heart J 1999; 138: 430-436.
4. Sciahbasi A, Fischetti D, Picciolo A, et al,. Transradial access compared with femoral puncture closure devices in percutaneous coronary procedures. Int J Cardiol 2009; 137: 199-205.
5. Amoroso G, Laarman GJ, Kiemeneij F,. Overview of the transradial approach in percutaneous coronary intervention. J Cardiovasc Med 2007; 8: 230-237.
6. Lozano I, Rondan J, Avanzas P, et al,. Rotational atherectomy through radial access with a 7.5 Fr sheathless guiding catheter. Rev Esp Cardiol 2011; 64: 247-248.
7. Liang M, Puri A, Linder R,. Transradial simultaneous kissing stenting (SKS) with sheathless access. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75; 222-224.
8. Mamas MA, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Fraser DG,. Atraumatic complex transradial intervention using large bore sheathless guide catheter. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 72: 357-364.
9. Mamas M, D'Souza S, Hendry C, et al,. Use of the sheathless guide catheter during routine transradial percutaneous coronary intervention: A feasibility study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 596-602.
10. Trager S, Pignataro M, Anderson J, et al,. Color flow Doppler: Imaging the upper extremity. J Hand Surg 1993; 18: 621-625.
11. Yoo BS, Yoon J, Ko JY, et al,. Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: Arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity. Int J Cardiol 2005; 101: 421-427.
12. Wakeyama T, Ogawa H, Iida H, et al,. Intima-media thickening of the radial artery after transradial intervention: An intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 1109-1114.
13. Hamon M, Sabatier R, Zhao Q, et al,. Mini-invasive strategy in acute coronary syndromes: Direct coronary stenting using 5 Fr guiding catheters and transradial approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 55: 340-343.
14. Kiemeneij F, Fraser D, Slagboom T, et al,. Hydrophilic coating aids radial sheath withdrawal and reduces patient discomfort following transradial coronary intervention: A randomized double-blind comparison of coated and uncoated sheaths. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003; 59: 161-164.
15. Dahm JB, Vogelgesang D, Hummel A, et al,. A randomized trial of 5 vs 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 57: 172-176.
16. Saito S, Ikei H, Hosakawa G, Tanaka S,. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999; 46: 173-178.