Tomato quality evaluation using electronic nose systems to complement sensory analysis

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 682, Issue , 2005, Pages 1021-1028

  Berna, A ^a   Lammertyn, J ^a   Saevels, S ^a   Nicolai B ^a   Grun I U ^b   De Poortere, S ^c   Buysens, S ^c   Di Natale, C ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^c Vegetable Research Centre   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Generalized procrustes analysis; Lycopersicon esculentum mill.; Principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879973440     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.682.133     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Berna, A. Z., Lammertyn, J., Saevels, S., Di Natale, C. and Nicolaï, B. M. 2004. Electronic nose systems to study shelf life and cultivar effect on tomato aroma profile. Sensor Actuat B-Chem. 97:324-333.
2. Baldwin, E. A., Nisperos-Carriedo, M. O., Baker, R. and Scott, W. 1991. Quantitative analysis of flavour analysis parameters in six Florida tomato cultivars (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). J. Agric. Food. Chem. 39:1135-1140.
3. Buttery, R. G., Teranishi, R. and Ling, L. C. 1987. Fresh tomato aroma volatiles: a quantitative study. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 35:540-544.
4. ISO 8589. 1988. Sensory analysis. General guidance for the design of test rooms. International Standards Organization (ISO), Switzerland.
5. Krumbein, A. and Auerswald, H. 1998. Characterization of aroma volatiles in tomato by sensory. Nahrung 42:395-399.
6. Marsili, R. 2002. Combining Mass Spectrometry and Multivariate Analysis to Make a Reliable and Versatile Electronic Nose. p. 349-374. In: R. Marsili (ed.), Flavor, Fragance, and Odor Analysis. Rockford, Illinois.
7. McGorrin, R. J. and Gimelfarb, L. 2001. Aspects of Tomatillo Flavour. p. 73-90. In: G. Takeoka, M. Güntert and K. Engel (eds.), Aroma Active Compounds in Foods, Chemistry and Sensory Properties. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
8. Saevels, S., Di Natale, C., Berna, A. Z., Veraverbeke, E., Lammertyn, J. and Nicolaï, B. M. 2003 a. Electronic nose as a non-destructive tool to evaluate the optimal harvest date of apples. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 30:3-14.
9. Saevels, S., Lammertyn, J., Berna, A. Z., Veraverbeke, E., Di Natale, C. and Nicolai, B. 2003b. An electronic nose and a mass spectrometric based electronic nose for assessing apple quality during shelf life. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 31:9-19.
10. U. S. Department of Agriculture. 1975. Color Classification Requirements in Tomatoes, Visual Aid TM-L-1. The John Henry Co., Lansing, Mich., USA.