Reduction of metal artifacts from hip prostheses on CT images of the pelvis: Value of iterative reconstructions

Radiology

Volumn 268, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 237-244

  Morsbach, Fabian ^a   Bickelhaupt, Sebastian ^a   Wanner, Guido A ^a   Krauss, Andreas ^b   Schmidt, Bernhard ^b   Alkadhi, Hatem ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b Imaging and Therapy Systems Division   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIATRIZOATE; FAT; MEGLUMINE DIATRIZOATE; STEEL; TITANIUM; WATER;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EX VIVO STUDY; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; METAL ARTIFACT; PELVIC DISEASE; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; RELIABILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIATRIZOATE MEGLUMINE; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84879970245     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122089     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(4):780-785.
2. Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. RadioGraphics 2004;24(6): 1679-1691.
3. Roth TD, Maertz NA, Parr JA, Buckwalter KA, Choplin RH. CT of the hip prosthesis: appearance of components, fixation, and complications. RadioGraphics 2012;32(4): 1089-1107.
4. Kalender WA, Hebel R, Ebersberger J. Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. Radiology 1987;164(2):576-577.
5. Yu L, Li H, Mueller J, et al. Metal artifact reduction from reformatted projections for hip prostheses in multislice helical computed tomography: techniques and initial clinical results. Invest Radiol 2009;44(11):691-696.
6. Watzke O, Kalender WA. A pragmatic approach to metal artifact reduction in CT: merging of metal artifact reduced images. Eur Radiol 2004;14(5):849-856.
7. Kachelriess M, Watzke O, Kalender WA. Generalized multi-dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral singleslice, multi-slice, and cone-beam CT. Med Phys 2001;28(4):475-490.
8. Boas FE, Fleischmann D. Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography. Radiology 2011; 259(3):894-902.
9. De Man B, Nuyts J, Dupont P, Marchal G, Suetens P. An iterative maximum-likelihood polychromatic algorithm for CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20(10):999-1008.
10. Meinel FG, Bischoff B, Zhang Q, Bamberg F, Reiser MF, Johnson TR. Metal artifact reduction by dual-energy computed tomography using energetic extrapolation: a systematically optimized protocol. Invest Radiol 2012; 47(7):406-414.
11. Guggenberger R, Winklhofer S, Osterhoff G, et al. Metallic artefact reduction with monoenergetic dual-energy CT: systematic ex vivo evaluation of posterior spinal fusion implants from various vendors and different spine levels. Eur Radiol 2012;22(11):2357-2364.
12. Brook OR, Gourtsoyianni S, Brook A, Mahadevan A, Wilcox C, Raptopoulos V. Spectral CT with metal artifacts reduction software for improvement of tumor visibility in the vicinity of gold fiducial markers. Radiology 2012;263(3):696-705.
13. Zhou C, Zhao YE, Luo S, et al. Monoenergetic imaging of dual-energy CT reduces artifacts from implanted metal orthopedic devices in patients with factures. Acad Radiol 2011;18(10):1252-1257.
14. Haramati N, Staron RB, Mazel-Sperling K, et al. CT scans through metal scanning technique versus hardware composition. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1994;18(6):429-434.
15. Meyer E, Raupach R, Lell M, Schmidt B, Kachelriess M. Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography. Med Phys 2010;37(10):5482- 5493.
16. Prell D, Kyriakou Y, Kachelrie M, Kalender WA. Reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography caused by hip endoprostheses using a physics-based approach. Invest Radiol 2010;45(11):747-754.
17. Meyer E, Raupach R, Lell M, Schmidt B, Kachelrie M. Frequency split metal artifact reduction (FSMAR) in computed tomography. Med Phys 2012;39(4):1904-1916.
18. Clement H, Heidari N, Grechenig W, Weinberg AM, Pichler W. Drilling, not a benign procedure: laboratory simulation of true drilling depth. Injury 2012;43(6):950-952.
19. Bankier AA, Kressel HY. Through the Looking Glass revisited: the need for more meaning and less drama in the reporting of dose and dose reduction in CT. Radiology 2012;265(1): 4-8.
20. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86(2):420-428.
21. Mahnken AH, Raupach R, Wildberger JE, et al. A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. Invest Radiol 2003;38(12):769-775.