Using pareto points for model identification in predictive toxicology

Journal of Cheminformatics

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Palczewska, Anna ^a   Neagu, Daniel ^a   Ridley, Mick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Model combination; Model identification; Pareto optimality; Predictive toxicology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879927550     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17582946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1758-2946-5-16     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Helma C (Ed): Predictive Toxicology. Boca Raton: Taylor Francis Group; 2005.
2. Kavlock R: A framework for computational toxicology research in ORD. [http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=100046MA.txt]
3. Judson R: Public databases supporting computational toxicology. J Toxicol Environ Health Part B 2010 13(2):218-231.
4. REACH [http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/reach/reach-intro. htm]
5. OpenTox [http://www.opentox.org]
6. Inkspot Cloud platform for portable scalable and secure cloud computing [http://www.inkspot.co]
7. OCHEM [http://ochem.eu]
8. Gasteiger J (Ed): Handbook of Chemoinformatics: From Data to Knowledge. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH; 2003.
9. OECD principles for the validation for regulatory purposes of QSAR models [http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/37/37849783.pdf]
10. Golbraikh A Tropsha A: Beware of q2. JMol Graph Model 2002 20:269-276.
11. Gramatica P: Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external. QSAR Comb Sci 2007 26:694-7012.
12. Jaworska J Comber M Auer C Leeuwen C: Summary of a workshop on regulatory acceptance of (Q)SARs for human health and environmental endpoints. Environ Health Perspect 2003 111:1358-1360. (Pubitemid 37021141)
13. Jaworska J Nikolova-Jelizkova N Aldenberg T: QSAR applicability domain estimation by projection of the training set in descriptor space: A review. ATLA Alternat Lab Anim 2005 33:445-459. (Pubitemid 41613738)
14. Tropsha A Gramatica P Gombar V: The importance of being earnest: validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb Sci 2003 22:69-77. (Pubitemid 36717473)
15. Cartmell J Enoch S Krstajic D Leahy D: Automated QSPR through competitive workflow. J Comput-Aided Mol Design 2005 19:821-833.
16. Zhu H Tropsha A Fourches D Varnek A Papa E Gramatical P Oberg T Dao P Cherkasov A Tetko I: Combinatorial QSAR modeling of chemical toxicants tested against Tetrahymena pyriformis. J Chem InfModel 2008 48(4):766-784. (Pubitemid 351757744)
17. Patlewicz G Jeliazkova N Gallegos Saliner A Worth A: Toxmatch-a new software tool to aid in the development and evaluation of chemically similar groups. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2008 19(3):397-412. (Pubitemid 351998861)
18. Tropsha A: Best practices for QSARmodel development validation and exploitation. Mol Inf 2010 29(6-7):476-488.
19. Hardy B Douglas N Helma C Rautenberg M Jeliazkova N Jeliazkov V Nikolova I Benigni R Tcheremenskaia O Kramer S Girschick T Buchwald F Wicker J Karwath A Gutlein M Maunz A Sarimveis H Melagraki G Afantitis A Sopasakis P Gallagher D Poroikov V Filimonov D Zakharov A Lagunin A Gloriozova T Novikov S Skvortsova N Druzhilovsky D Chawla S Ghosh I Ray S Patel H Escher S: Collaborative development of predictive toxicology applications. J Cheminformatics 2010 2:7.
20. EPI Suite [http://www.epa.gov/oppt/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm]
21. JRC QSARModel Reporting Format (QMRF). [http://qsardb.jrc.ec. europa.eu/qmrf/]
22. Spjuth O Willighagen E Guha R Eklund M Wikberg J: Towards interoperable and reproducible QSAR analyses: Exchange of datasets. J Cheminformatics 2010 2:5.
23. Kohavi R: A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation andmodel selection. In Proceedings of the 14th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2 IJCAI'95. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.; 1995:1137-1143.
24. Izrailev S Agrafiotis DK: Amethod for quantifying and visualizing the diversity of QSARmodels. JMol Graph Model 2004 22(4):275-284. (Pubitemid 38183097)
25. Kuncheva L: Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms.Wiley: Wiley; 2004.
26. Todeschini R Consonni V Pavan M: A distancemeasure between models: A tool for similarity/diversity analysis ofmodel populations. Chemometrics Intell Lab Syst 2004 70:55-61. (Pubitemid 38102218)
27. Makhtar M Neagu D Ridley M: Predictive model representation and comparison: Towards data and predictive models governance. In Comput Intell (UKCI) 2010 UK Workshop on; 2010:1-6.
28. Wojak A Neagu D Ridley M: Double Min-Score (DMS) Algorithm for automatedmodel selection in predictive toxicology. In United KingdomWorkshop in Computational Intelligence (UKCI 2011); 2011:150-156.
29. Ehrgott M: Multicriteria Optimization. New York Inc.: Springer-Verlag; 2005.
30. Todeschini R Consonni V: Handbook of Molecular Descriptors. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH; 2000.
31. Flower DR: On the properties of bit string-basedmeasures of chemical similarity. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1998 38(3):379-386. (Pubitemid 128594448)
32. Jahnson M Maggiora G: Concept of Application of Molecular Similarity. New York: John Wiley Sons; 1990.
33. Soto A Cecchini R Vazquez G Ponzoni I: Multi-objective feature selection in QSAR using amachine learning approach. QSAR Comb Sci 2009 28(11-12):1509-1523.
34. Tappeta RV Renaud JE: Interactive multiobjective optimization procedure. AIAA J 1999 37:881-889.
35. Willet P Berdnard J Downs G: Chemical Similarity Searching. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1998 38:983-996. (Pubitemid 128591261)
36. Tetratox [http://www.vet.utk.edu/TETRATOX]
37. Inchemicotox [http://www.inchemicotox.org/results/]
38. Schultz TW: TETRATOX: Tetrahymena Pyriformis population growth impairment endpointa surrogate for fish lethality. Toxicol Methods 1997 7(4):289-309.
39. Xue Y Li H Ung CY Yap CW Chen YZ: Classification of a diverse set of Tetrahymena pyriformis toxicity chemical compounds from molecular descriptors by statistical learning methods. Chem Res Toxicol 2006 19(8):1030-1039. (Pubitemid 44389202)
40. Ellison C Cronin M Madden J Schultz T: Definition of the structural domain of the baseline non-polar narcosismodel for Tetrahymena pyriformis. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2008 19(7-8):751-783.
41. Enoch S Cronin M Schultz T Madden J: An evaluation of global QSAR models for the prediction of the toxicity of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis. Chemosphere 2008 71(7):1225-1232.
42. Steinbeck C Han Y Kuhn S Horlacher O Luttmann E Willighagen E: The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK): An open-source java library for Chemo- and Bioinformatics. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003 43:493-500.
43. Hall M Frank E Holmes G Pfahringer B Reutemann P Witten IH: The WEKA datamining software: An update. SIGKDD Explor Newsl 2009 11:10-18.
44. The R Project for Statistical Computing [http://www.r-project.org/]
45. RCDK [http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rcdk/index.html]