Greenhouse gas emissions from calf- and yearling-fed beef production systems, with and without the use of growth promotants

Animals

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 195-220

  Basarab, John ^a   Baron, Vern ^a   López Campos, Óscar ^a   Aalhus, Jennifer ^a   Haugen Kozyra, Karen ^b   Okine, Erasmus ^c  

^a LACOMBE RESEARCH CENTRE   (Canada)

^b The Prasino Group   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Beef; Carbon footprint; Hormone implant; Life cycle assessment; Production efficiency

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879915268     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20762615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ani2020195     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. How to Feed the World in 2050; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2009.
2. Capper, J.L. Comparing the environmental impact of the US beef industry in 1977 to 2007. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 2, 826.
3. Capper, J.L. Replacing rose-tinted spectacles with a high-powered microscope: The historical versus modern carbon footprint of animal agriculture. Anim. Front. 2011, 1, 26-32.
4. Hume, D.A.; Whitelaw, C.B.A.; Archibald, A.L. The future of animal production: Improving productivity and sustainability. J. Agr. Sci. 2011, doi:10.1017/S0021859610001188.
5. Ferrell, C.L.; Jenkins, T.G. Cow type and nutritional environment: Nutritional aspects. J. Anim. Sci. 1985, 61, 725-741.
6. Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development. Economic, productive and financial benchmarks for Alberta cow/calf operations. 2005. Available online: http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/ deptdocs.nsf/all/econ8479 (accessed on 1 October 2011).
7. Pelletier, N.; Pirog, R.; Rasmussen. R. Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States. Agr. Syst. 2010, 103, 380-389.
8. Peters, G.M.; Rowley, H.V.; Wiedemann, S.; Tucker, R.; Short, M.D.; Schulz, M. Red meat production in Australia: Life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 1327-1332.
9. Cederberg, C.; Persson, M.; Neovius, K.; Molander, S.; Clift, R. Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 1773-1779.
10. Verge, X.P.C.; Dyer, J.A.; Desjardins, R.L.; Worth, D. Greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian beef industry. Agr. Syst. 2008, 98, 126-134.
11. Beauchemin, K.A.; Janzen, H.; Little, S.M.; McAllister, T.A.; McGinn, S.M. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada: A case study. Agr. Syst. 2010, 103, 371-379.
12. Archer, J.A.; Richardson, E.C.; Herd, R.M.; Arthur, P.F. Potential for selection to improve efficiency of feed use in beef cattle: A review. Australian J. Agr. Res. 1999, 50, 147-161.
13. Johnson, D.E.; Ferrell, C.L.; Jenkins, T.G. The history of energetic efficiency research: Where have we been and where are we going? J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 81, E27-E38.
14. Crews, D.H., Jr. Genetics of efficient feed utilization and national cattle evaluation: A review. Genet. Mol. Res. 2005, 4, 152-165.
15. Fairfull, R.W.; McMillan, L.; Muir, W.M. Poultry breeding: Progress and prospects for genetic improvement of egg and meat production. Available online: http://cgil.uoguelph.ca/pub/6wcgalp/ 6wcFairfull.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2011).
16. Merks, J.W.M. One Century of Genetic Changes in Pigs and Future Needs. In The Challenge of Genetic Change in Animal Production; Hill, W.G., Bishop, S.C., McGuirk, B., McKay, J.C., Simm, G., Webb, A.J., Eds.; BSAS: Edinburgh, UK, 2000; pp. 8-19. Available online: http://bsas.org.uk/downloads/genchan/paper2.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2011).
17. Chen, P.; Baas, T.J.; Mabry, J.W.; Dekkers, J.C.M.; Koehler, K.J. Genetic parameters and trends for lean growth rate and its components in U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 80, 2062-2070.
18. Hermesch, S. Genetic improvement of lean meat growth and feed efficiency in pigs. Australian J. Exper. Agr. 2004, 44, 383-391.
19. Basarab, J.A.; Baron, V.S.; Okine, E.K. Discovering Nutrition Related Opportunities in the Carbon Credit System for Beef cattle. In Proceedings of 30th Western Nutrition Conference, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 23-24 September 2009; pp. 241-260.
20. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, 7th ed.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
21. IPCC. Third Assessment Report, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC. Available online: http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/?src=/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/248.htm (accessed on 1 October 2011).
22. 2 emissions from lime and urea application. Available online: http://www.ipccnggip. iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/4-Volume_4/V4._11-Ch11_N2O&CO2pdfhtm (accessed on 1 October 2011).
23. Basarab, J.A.; McCartney, D.; Okine, E.K.; Baron, V.S. Relationships between progeny residual feed intake and dam productivity traits. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 87, 489-502.
24. Basarab, J.A.; Colazo, M.G.; Ambrose, D.J.; Novak, S.; McCartney, D.; Baron, V.S. Residual feed intake adjusted for backfat thickness and feeding frequency is independent of fertility in beef heifers. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 91, 573-584.
25. Basarab, J.A.; Okine, E.K.; Baron, V.S.; Marx, T.; Ramsey, P.; Ziegler, K.; Lyle, K. Methane emissions from enteric fermentation in Alberta's beef cattle population. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 85, 501-512.
26. CCAC Canadian Council on Animal Care. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals. In Canadian Council on Animal Care; Olfert, E.D., Cross, B.M., McWilliams, A.A., Eds.; CCAC: Ottawa ON, Canada. 1993; Volume 1.
27. López-Campos, Ó.; Aalhus, J.L.; Okine, E.K.; Baron, V.S.; Basarab, J.A. Effects of Calf Production Systems and Growth Promotants on Production and Profitability; Final Report; Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency Ltd.: Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2012.
28. Newman, J.A.; Rahnefeld, G.W.; Tong, A.K.W.; Jones, S.D.M.; Fredeen, H.T.; Weiss, G.M.; Bailey, D.R.C. Slaughter and carcass traits of calves from first-cross and reciprocal back-cross beef cows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1994, 74, 621-632.
29. Ecological Stratification Working Group. A National Ecological Framework for Canada; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1995.
30. McCartney, D.H.; Block, H. C; Dubeski, D. L; Ohama, A.J. Review: The composition and availability of straw and chaff from small grain cereals for beef cattle in western Canada. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 86, 443-455.
31. Etheridge, R.D.; Pesti, G.M.; Foster, E.H. A comparison of nitrogen values obtained utilizing the Kjeldahl nitrogen and Dumas combustion methodologies (Leco CNS 2000) on samples typical of animal nutrition analytical laboratory. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1998, 73, 21-28.
32. Nagy, C.N. Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emission Coefficients for Inputs Used in Agriculture. In Report to Prairie Adaptation Research Collaborative; Centre for Studies in Agriculture, Law and the Environment: Saskatoon, Canada, 2000; p. 11.
33. Nagy, C.N. Energy Coefficients for Agriculture Inputs in Western Canada; CSALE Working Paper Series #2; Centre for Studies in Agriculture, Law and the Environment: Saskatoon, Canada, 1999; p. 44.
34. Saskatchewan Agriculture Farm Machinery Custom Rental Guide 2008-09; Saskatchewan Agriculture: Regina, SK, Canada. Available online: www.agriculture.gov.sk.ca (accessed on 5 May 2008).
35. Zentner, R.P.; Brandt, S.A.; Nagy, C.N.; Frick, B. Economics and Energy Use Efficiency of Alternative Cropping Strategies for the Dark Brown Soil Zone of Saskatchewan. Saskatchewan Agricultural Development Fund Final Report; Project # 20070029; Saskatchewan Agriculture Development Fund: Saskatoon, Canada, 2009.
36. Snyder, C.S.; Bruulsema, T.W.; Jensen, T.L.; Fixen, P.E. Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2009, 133, 247-266.
37. 2O emissions from agricultural soils in Canada. I. Development of a country-specific methodology. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2008, 88, 641-654.
38. Worth, D.E.; Desjardins, R.L. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Private Communication, 2011.
39. Janzen, H.H.; Beauchemin, K.A.; Bruinsma, Y.; Campbell, C.A.; Desjardins, R.L.; Ellert, B.H.; Smith, E.G., The fate of nitrogen in agroecosystems: An illustration using Canadian estimates. Nutr. Cyc. Agroecosyst. 2003, 67, 85-102.
40. Baron, V. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada. Private Communication, 2011.
41. Alberta Cow-Calf Audit; Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development: Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2001.
42. Little, S.; Linderman, J.; Maclean, K.; Janzen, H. HOLOS-A Tool to Estimate and Reduce Greenhouse Gases from Farms; Methodology and Algorithms for Versions 1.1x; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada: Lethbridge, AB, Canada, 2008.
43. Nguyen, T.L.T.; Hermansen, J.E.; Mogensen, L. Environmental consequences of different beef production systems in the EU. J. Cleaner Prod. 2010, 18, 756-766.
44. Cederberg, C.; Meyer, D.; Flysjo, A. Life Cycle Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Use of Land and Energy in Brazilian Beef Production; The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology: Gothenburg, Sweden. 2009.
45. Casey, J.W.; Holden, N.M. Quantification of GHG emissions from suckler-beef production in Ireland. Agr. Syst. 2006, 90, 79-98.
46. Johnson, D.E.; Phetteplace, H.W.; Seidl, A.F.; Schneider, U.A.; McCarl, B.A. Management Variations of U.S. Beef Production Systems; Effects on Greenhouse Gas Emission and Profitability. In Proceedings of 3rd International Methane and Nitrous Oxide Mitigation Conference; Beijing, China, 17-21 November 2003. Available online: http://www.coalinfo.net.cn/ coalbed/meeting/2203/papers/agriculture/index.html#day1 (accessed on 1 October 2011).
47. Malhi, S.S.; Lemke, R.L.; Liebig, M.A.; McConkey, B.; Schoenau, J.J.; Cihacek, L.J.; Campbell, C. Management strategies and practices for increasing storage of organic C and N in soil in cropping systems in the Northern Great Plains of North America. In Recent Trends in Soil Science and Agronomy Research in the Northern Great Plains of North America; Malhi, S.S., Ed.; Gan, Y., Schoenau, J.J., Lemke, R.L., Liebig, M.A., As. Eds.; Research Signpost: Trivandrum, Kerala, India, 2010; pp. 325-384.
48. Annex 3-Additional Methodologies; National Inventory Report (NIR) Part 2; Canada's 2011 UNFCCC Submission 1990-2009; Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2011; pp. 50-163.
49. Bremer, E.; Janzen, H.H.; Ellert, B.H.; Mckenzie, R.H. Soil organic carbon after twelve years of various crop rotations in an Aridic Boroll. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2008, 72, 970-974.
50. Bremer, E.; Janzen, H.H.; Johnston, A.M. Sensitivity of total, light-fraction and mineralizable organic matter to management practices in a Lethbridge soil. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1994, 74, 131-138.
51. Mensah, F.; Schoenau, J.J.; Malhi, S.S. Soil carbon changes in cultivated and excavated land converted to grasses in east-central Saskatchewan. Biogeochemistry 2003, 63, 85-92.
52. Nelson, J.D.J.; Schoeneau, J.J.; Malhi, S.S. Soil organic carbon changes and distribution in cultivated and restored grassland soils in Saskatchewan. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2008, 82, 137-148.
53. Vleeshouwers, L.M.; Verhagen, A. Carbon emissions and sequestration by agricultural land use: A model study for Europe. Glogal Change Biol. 2002, 8, 519-530.
54. Chan, K.Y.; Conyers, M.K.; Li, G.D.; Helyar, K.R.; Poile, G.; Oates, A.; Barchia, I.H. Soil carbon dynamics under different cropping and pasture management in temperate Australia: Results of three long-term experiments. Soil Res. 2011, 49, 320-328.
55. Baron, V.S.; Young, D.G.; Dugas, W.A.; Mielnick, P.C.; La Bine, C.; Skinner, H.G.; Casson, J. Net Ecosystem Carbon Dioxide Exchange over a Temperate Short Season Grassland: Transition from Cereal to Perennial Forage. In Climate Change and Managed Ecosystems; Bhatti, J.S., Lal, R., Apps, M.J., Price, M.A., Eds.; CRC. Taylor and Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 163-174.
56. Conant, R.T.; Paustian, K.; Elliot, E.T. Grassland management and conversion into grassland effects on soil carbon. Ecol. Appl. 2001, 11, 343-355.
57. Franzluebbers, A.J. Achieving soil organic carbon sequestration with conservation agricultural systems in the Southeastern United States. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2010, 74, 347-357.
58. Franzluebbers, A.J.; Studemann, J.A. Surface soil changes during twelve years of pasture management in the Southern Piedmont USA. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2010, 74, 2131-2141.
59. Malhi, S.S.; Brandt, S.; Gill, K.S. Cultivation and grassland type effects on light fraction and total organic C and N in a Dark Brown Chernozemic soil. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2003, 83, 145-153.
60. Dyer, J.A.; Verge, X.P.C.; Desjardins, R.L.; Worth, D.E.; McConkey, B.G. The impact of increased biodiesel production on the greenhouse gas emissions from field crops in Canada. Energy Sustain. Develop. 2010, 14, 73-82.