Replacing rose-tinted spectacles with a high-powered microscope: The historical versus modern carbon footprint of animal agriculture

Animal Frontiers

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 26-32

  Capper, Judith L ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beef; Dairy; Food miles; Productivity; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860901307     PISSN: 21606056     EISSN: 21606064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/af.2011-0009     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Beauchemin, K. A., H. Janzen, S. M. Little, T. A. McAllister, and S. M. McGinn. 2010. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada: A case study. Agric. Sys. 103:371-379
2. Bertrand, S., and J. Barnett. 2011. Standard method for determining the carbon footprint of dairy products reduces confusion. Anim. Front. 1:14-18
3. Capper, J. L. 2010a. Comparing the environmental impact of the US beef industry in 1977 to 2007. J. Anim. Sci. 88(E-Suppl. 2):826. (Abstr.)
4. Capper, J. L. 2010b. The environmental impact of conventional, natural and grassfed beef production systems. Proc. Greenhouse Gases and Anim. Agric. Conf. 2010, Banff, Canada
5. Capper, J. L., R. A. Cady, and D. E. Bauman. 2009a. Demystifying the environmental sustainability of food production. Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf., Syracuse, NY, USA
6. Capper, J. L., R. A. Cady, and D. E. Bauman. 2009b. The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. J. Anim. Sci. 87:2160-2167
7. Cederberg, C., M. Persson, K. Neovius, S. Molander, and R. Clift. 2011. Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:1773-1779
8. Cederberg, C., U. Sonesson, M. Henriksson, V. Sund, and J. Davis. 2009. Greenhouse gas emissions from Swedish production of meat, milk and eggs: 1990 and 2005. Swedish Inst. Food & Biotechnol., Gothenburg, Sweden
9. Croney, C. 2011. Should animal welfare policy be affected by consumer perceptions? Facing the challenges of modern dairying. Western Canadian Dairy Seminar, Red Deer, Canada
10. de Vries, A., and I. J. M. de Boer. 2010. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments. Livest. Sci. 128:1-11
11. FAO. 2006. Livestock's Long Shadow-Environmental Issues and Options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
12. FAO. 2009. How to Feed the World in 2050. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
13. FAO. 2010. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Dairy Sector: A Life Cycle Assessment. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
14. Gill, M., P. Smith, and J. M. Wilkinson. 2009. Mitigating climate change: The role of domestic livestock. Animal 4:323-333
15. Havenstein, G. B., P. R. Ferket, and M. A. Qureshi. 2003. Growth, livability, and feed conversion of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 82:1500-1508
16. Innovation Center for US Dairy. 2010. U.S. Dairy Sustainability Commitment Progress Report. Innovation Center for US Dairy, Rosemont, IL, USA
17. International Trade Centre UNCTAD/WTO Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL). 2007. Organic Farming and Climate Change. ITC, Geneva, Switzerland
18. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Secretariat, Geneva
19. Katajajuuri, J. M. 2008. Experiences and improvement possibilities-LCA case study of broiler chicken production. Proc. Int. Conf. Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector, Zurich, Switzerland
20. Konarzewski, M., A. Gavin, R. McDevitt, and I. R. Wallis. 2000. Metabolic and organ mass responses to selection for high growth rates in the domestic chicken (Gallus domesticus). Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 73:237-248
21. Ogino, A., K. Kaku, T. Osada, and K. Shimada. 2004. Environmental impacts of the Japanese beef-fattening system with different feeding lengths as evaluated by a life-cycle assessment method. J. Anim. Sci. 82:2115-2122
22. Pelletier, N. 2008. Environmental performance in the US broiler poultry sector: Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas, ozone depleting, acidifying and eutrophying emissions. Agric. Sys. 98:67-73
23. Pelletier, N., R. Pirog, and R. Rasmussen. 2010. Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States. Agric. Sys. 103:380-389
24. Peters, G. M., H. V. Rowley, S. Wiedemann, R. Tucker, M. D. Short, and M. Schulz. 2010. Red meat production in Australia: Life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44:1327-1332
25. Pollan, M. 2008. Oct. 12. Farmer in Chief. New York Times Magazine, New York, NY, USA
26. Polyface Inc. 2011. Food Sales. Accessed Mar. 30, 2011. http://www.polyfacefarms. com/taste.aspx. Polyface Farms Inc., Swoope, VA, USA
27. Rischkowsky, B., and D. Pilling. 2007. The State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Rome, Italy
28. Roe, F. G. 1951. The North American Buffalo: A Critical Study of the Species in its Wild State. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada
29. Schmidt, C. J., M. E. Persia, E. Feierstein, B. Kingham, and W. W. Saylor. 2009. Comparison of a modern broiler line and a heritage line unselected since the 1950s. Poult. Sci. 88:2610-2619
30. Singer, P., and J. Mason. 2006. The Way We Eat: Why Our Food Choices Matter. 1st ed. Rodale Books, Emmaus, PA, USA
31. Strid Eriksson, I., H. Elmquist, S. Stern, and T. Nybrant. 2005. Systems analysis of pig production-The impact of feed choice. Int. J. LCA 10:143-154
32. USDA. 1978. Livestock Slaughter Annual Summary 1977. USDA, Washington, DC, USA
33. USDA. 2009. Data and Statistics. Accessed Mar. 30, 2010. http://www.nass.usda. gov/Data_and_Statistics/Quick_Stats/index.asp. USDA, Washington, DC, USA
34. USDA/NASS. 2008. Livestock Slaughter 2007 Summary. USDA, Washington, DC, USA
35. USDA/NASS. 2010. Livestock Slaughter Annual Summary. USDA, Washington, DC, USA
36. US EPA. 2007. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990-2005. Annex 3: Methodological Descriptions for Additional Source or Sink Categories. US EPA, Washington, DC, USA
37. US EPA. 2009. Light-Duty Automotive Technology, Carbon Dioxide Emissions, and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 through 2009. US EPA, Washington, DC, USA
38. US EPA. 2011. Emission Facts: Average Carbon Dioxide Emissions Resulting from Gasoline and Diesel Fuel. Accessed Mar. 30, 2011. http://www.epa.gov/oms/ climate/420f05001.htm. US EPA, Washington, DC, USA
39. Vergé, X. P. C., J. A. Dyer, R. L. Desjardins, and D. Worth. 2009. Greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian pork industry. Livest. Sci. 121:92-101
40. Walsh, B. 2009. Getting real about the price of cheap food. Time 174:30-37
41. Yiridoe, E. C., S. Bonti-Ankomah, and R. C. Martina. 2005. Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: A review and update of the literature. Renew. Agric. Food Sys. 20:193-205