Random regret-based discrete-choice modelling: An application to healthcare

PharmacoEconomics

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 623-634

  De Bekker Grob, Esther W ^a   Chorus, Caspar G ^b  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

WART VIRUS VACCINE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CANCER PREVENTION; CHILD; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; HYBRID RANDOM UTILITY MAXIMIZATION RANDOM REGRET MINIMIZATION MODEL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NAUSEA; OSTEOPOROSIS; PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTION; PREDICTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RANDOM REGRET MINIMIZATION MODEL; RANDOM UTILITY MAXIMIZATION MODEL; SCHOOL CHILD; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; VACCINATION;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; OSTEOPOROSIS; PAPILLOMAVIRUS VACCINES; PATIENT PREFERENCE;

EID: 84879914253     PISSN: 11707690     EISSN: 11792027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40273-013-0059-0     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ryan M, Gerards K, Amaya-Amaya M, editors. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008.
2. de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2012;21(2):145-72.
3. Mangham LJ, Hanson K, McPake B. How to do (or not to do). Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24(2):151-8.
4. Louviere J, Hensher DA, Swait JD. Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
5. Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH. Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
6. Louviere JJ, Lancsar E. Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future. Health Econ Policy Law. 2009;4(Pt 4):527-46.
7. Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661-77.
8. Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2(1):55-64.
9. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P, editor. Frontiers in econometrics. New York: Academic Press; 1974. pp. 105-42.
10. Arentze TA, Timmermans HJP. Parametric action trees: incorporating continuous attribute variables into rule-based models of discrete choice. Transport Res B. 2007;41(7):772-83.
11. Kivetz R, Netzer O, Srinivasan V. Alternative models for capturing the compromise effects. J Mark Res. 2004;41:237-57.
12. Swait JD. A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs. Transport Res B. 2001;35:903-28.
13. Zhang J, Timmermans HJP, Borgers A, Wang D. Modelling traveler choice behavior using the concepts of relative utility and relevant interest. Transport Res B. 2004;38(3):215-34.
14. Chorus CG. Random regret-based discrete choice modelling: a tutorial. Heidelberg: Springer; 2012.
15. Chorus CG. A new model of random regret minimization. Eur J Transport Infrastruct Res. 2010;10(2):181-96.
16. Zeelenberg M, Pieters R. A theory of regret regulation 1.0. J Consumer Psychol. 2007;17(1):3-18.
17. Bell DE. Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper Res. 1982;30(5):961-81.
18. Chorus CG, Molin EJE, van Wee GP, Arentze TA, Timmermans HJP. Responses to transit information among car-drivers: regret-based models and simulations. Transp Plan Technol. 2006;29(4):249-71.
19. Loomes G, Sugden R. A rationale for preference reversal. Am Econ Rev. 1983;73(3):428-32.
20. Simonson I. The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchasing decisions. J Consumer Res. 1992;19(1):105-19.
21. Simonson I. Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. J Consumer Res. 1989;19:158-74.
22. Muller H, Kroll EB, Vogt B. Do real payments really matter? A re-examination of the compromise effect in hypothetical and binding choice settings. Mark Lett. 2012;23(1):73-92.
23. Chorus CG, Rose JM, Hensher DA. Regret minimisation or utility maximisation: it depends on the attribute. Environ Plan B. 2013;40(1):159-69.
24. de Bekker-Grob EW, Essink-Bot ML, Meerding WJ, Koes BW, Steyerberg EW. Preferences of GPs and patients for preventive osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(3):211-9.
25. de Bekker-Grob EW, Essink-Bot ML, Meerding WJ, Pols HA, Koes BW, Steyerberg EW. Patients' preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete choice experiment. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(7):1029-37.
26. de Bekker-Grob EW, Hofman R, Donkers B, van Ballegooijen M, Helmerhorst TJ, Raat H, et al. Girls' preferences for HPV vaccination: a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2010;28(41):6692-7.
27. Street D, Burgess L. Discrete choice experiments. 2007. http://maths.science.uts.edu.au/maths/wiki/SPExpts (Accessed 12 Jun 2012).
28. Bierlaire M. BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss transportation research conference, Ascona; 2003.
29. Train KE. Discrete choice methods with simulations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
30. Ben-Akiva ME, Swait J. The Akaike likelihood ratio index. Transp Sci. 1986;20:133-6.
31. Daly A, Hess S, de Jong G. Calculating errors for measures derived from choice modeling estimates. Transp Res Part B. 2012;46:333-41.
32. Chorus CG, De Jong GC. Modeling experienced accessibility for utility-maximizers and regret-minimizers. J Transport Geogr. 2011;19:1155-62.