Model-based characterization of mammographic masses

Informatik aktuell

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 287-291

  Von Der Heidt, Sven René ^a   Elter, Matthias ^b   Wittenberg, Thomas ^b   Paulus, Dietrich ^a  

^a Universität Koblenz Landau ^*  (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS IIS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE PROCESSING;

EIGENFACES; EXTENDED VERSIONS; FISHERFACE; MAMMOGRAPHIC; MAMMOGRAPHIC MASS; MAMMOGRAPHY DATABASE; MODEL-BASED OPC; ROC ANALYSIS;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84879913173     PISSN: 1431472X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-93860-6_58     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System BIRADS Atlas; 2006.
2. Oliver A, Marti J, Bosch A, et al. A new approach to the classification of mammo-graphic masses and normal breast tissue. In: The 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06); 2006. p. 707-710.
3. Shi J, Sahiner B, Chan HP, et al. Characterization of mammographic masses based on level set segmentation with new image features and patient information. Med Phys. 2008;35(1):280-290.
4. Varela C, Timp S, Karssemeijer N. Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(2):425-441. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/2/016.
5. Drukker K, Horsch K, Giger ML. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography. Acad Radiol. 2005;12(8):970-979. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2005.04. 014.
6. Timp S, Karssemeijer N. A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography. Med Phys. 2004;31(5):958-971.
7. Heath M, Bowyer K, Kopans D, et al. The digital database for screening mam-mography. Procs Int Workshop on Digital Mammography. 2001; p. 212-218.
8. Kessler W. Multivariante Datenanalyse: Für die Pharma-, Bio- und Prozessanalyse. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim; 2007.
9. Turk M, Pentland A. Eigenfaces for Recognition. J Cognitive Neuroscience. 1991;3(1):71-86.
10. Belhumeur PN, Hespanha JP, Kriegman DJ. Eigenfaces vs. fisherfaces: Recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Trans PAMI. 1997;19(7):711-720.
11. Jiang X, Mandal B, Kot A. Eigenfeature regularization and extraction in face recognition. IEEE Trans PAMI. 2008;30(3):383-394.
12. Metz CE, Herman BA, Shen JH. Maximum-likelihood estimation of ROC curves from continuously-distributed data. Stat Med. 1998;17:1033-1053.