Incorporation of structural health monitoring data on load effects in the reliability and redundancy assessment of ship cross-sections using Bayesian updating

Structural Health Monitoring

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 377-392

  Zhu, Benjin ^a   Frangopol, Dan M ^a  

^a Lehigh University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian updating; polar representation; redundancy; reliability; Ship; structural health monitoring

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN UPDATING; BAYESIAN UPDATING METHOD; POLAR REPRESENTATION; PRIOR INFORMATION; PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE; STRUCTURAL HEALTH; VERTICAL BENDING MOMENTS; WAVE-INDUCED LOADS;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; RELIABILITY; SHIPS; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING;

REDUNDANCY;

EID: 84879900939     PISSN: 14759217     EISSN: 17413168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1475921713495082     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ayyub BM,Assakkaf IA,Atua KI.Reliability-based load and resistance factor design (LRFD) of hull girders for surface ships.Nav Eng J. 2000;112 (4): 279-296.
2. Hussein AW,Guedes Soares C.Reliability and residual strength of double hull tankers designed according to the new IACS common structural rules.Ocean Eng. 2009;36 (17-18): 1446-1459.
3. Luís RM,Teixeira AP,Guedes Soares C.Longitudinal strength reliability of a tanker hull accidentally grounded.Struct Saf. 2009;31 (3): 224-233.
4. Mansour AEAssessment of reliability of ship structures. Washington D.C.: Ship Structure Committee; 1997:.
5. Nikolaidis E,Hughes O,Ayyub BM, et al. A methodology for reliability assessment of ship structures. Ship Structure Symposium, SSC/SNAME; Arlington, VA;. H1.
6. Blagojevic B,Ziha K.On the assessment of redundancy of ship structural components. Proceedings of the international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering (OMAE); Estoril, Portugal;. 673.
7. Decò A,Frangopol DM,Okasha NM.Time-variant redundancy of ship structures.J Ship Res. 2011;55 (3): 208-219.
8. Decò A,Frangopol DM,Zhu B.Reliability and redundancy assessment of ships under different operational conditions.Eng Struct. 2012;42:457-471.
9. Frangopol DM,Bocchini P,Decò A, et al.Integrated life-cycle framework for maintenance, monitoring, and reliability of naval ship structures.Nav Eng J. 2012;124 (1): 89-99.
10. Devine EA.An overview of the recently-completed JHSS monohull and trimaran structural seaways loads test program.PowerPoint Briefing, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division (NSWCCD). 2009;:.
11. Okasha NM,Frangopol DM,Saydam D, et al.Reliability analysis and damage detection in high-speed naval craft based on structural health monitoring data.Struct Health Monit. 2011;10 (4): 361-379.
12. Salvino LM,Collette MDMonitoring marine structures. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2009:.
13. Ang AH-S,Tang WHProbability concepts in engineering: emphasis on applications to civil and environmental engineering. 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2007.New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2007:.
14. Okasha NM,Frangopol DM,Decò A.Integration of structural health monitoring in life-cycle performance assessment of ship structures under uncertainty.Mar Struct. 2010;23 (3): 303-321.
15. Guedes Soares C,Teixeira AP.Structural reliability of two bulk carrier designs.Mar Struct. 2000;13 (2): 107-128.
16. Hughes OFShip structural design: a rationally-based, computer-aided, optimization approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1983:582.
17. International Association of Classification Societies (IACS). Common structural rules for double hull oil tankers. London: IACS, http://www.iacs.org.uk (2008).
18. Paik JK,Mansour AE.A simple formulation for predicting the ultimate strength of ships.J Mar Sci Technol. 1995;1 (1): 52-62.
19. Smith C.Influence of local compressive failure on ultimate longitudinal strength of a ship's hull. Proceedings of the PRADS: International symposium on practical design in shipbuilding; Tokyo, Japan;. 73.
20. Okasha NM,Frangopol DM.Efficient method based on optimization and simulation for the probabilistic strength computation of the ship hull.J Ship Res. 2010;54 (4): 1-13.
21. DNV. Rules for classification of ships. Norway: DNV, http://www.dnv.com (2011).
22. DNV. Rules for classification of high speed, light craft and naval surface craft. Norway: DNV, http://www.dnv.com (2012).
23. Pierson WJA unified mathematical theory for the analysis of propagation and refraction of storm-generated ocean surface waves, parts I and II. New York: New York University; 1952:.
24. Chakrabarti SKHydrodynamics of offshore structures. Berlin, Germany: Computational Mechanics Publications; 1987:.
25. Faltinsen OMSea loads on ships and offshore structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990:328.
26. PDSTRIP. Program PDSTRIP: public domain strip method-user manual, http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdstrip (2006).
27. Estes AC,Frangopol DM.RELSYS: a computer program for structural system reliability.Struct Eng Mech. 1998;6 (8): 901-999.
28. Frangopol DM.Life-cycle performance, management, and optimization of structural systems under uncertainty: accomplishments and challenges.Struct Infrastruct E. 2011;7 (6): 389-413.
29. Benjamin JR,Cornell CAProbability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1970:.
30. Bucher CComputational analysis of randomness in structural mechanics: vol. 3. Structures and infrastructures book series. London: Taylor & Francis; 2009:.
31. Paik JK,Frieze PA.Ship structural safety and reliability.Prog Struct Eng Mat. 2001;3 (2): 198-210.
32. Resolute Weather. Pierson-Moskowitz sea spectrum, http://www.eustis.army.mil/weather (2012).
33. Signal processing toolbox 6, user's guide. Natick, MA: The MathWorks, Inc.; 2010:.
34. Meet Minitab 16. State College, PA: Minitab, Inc.; 2011:1-13.