Integration of structural health monitoring in life-cycle performance assessment of ship structures under uncertainty

Marine Structures

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 303-321

  Okasha, Nader M ^a   Frangopol, Dan M ^a   Decò, Alberto ^a  

^a Lehigh University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian updating; Life cycle; Redundancy; Reliability; Ships; Structural health monitoring

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED MODELING TECHNIQUES; BAYESIAN UPDATING; DESIGN CODES; HIGH-SPEED; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SCALED MODELS; SEALIFT SHIPS; SHIP STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL HEALTH; SYSTEM REDUNDANCY; ULTIMATE FAILURE;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; HEALTH; INTEGRATION; LIFE CYCLE; QUALITY ASSURANCE; REDUNDANCY; SHIP TESTING; SHIPBUILDING; SHIPS;

STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; HEALTH MONITORING; HULL; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SHIP DESIGN; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 77956612976     PISSN: 09518339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2010.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Salvino LW, Brady TF. Hull monitoring system development using a hierarchical framework for data and information management. In: Proceedings of 7th International conference on computer and IT applications in the maritime industries, (COMPIT'08). Liege, Belgium; April (2008).
2. IACS Common structural rules for Double hull Oil Tankers 2008, International Association of Classification Societies, Available at. http://www.iacs.org.uk.
3. Frangopol DM. Life-cycle performance, management, and optimization of structural systems under uncertainty: Accomplishments and challenges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Taylor & Francis, in press, doi:10.1080/15732471003594427. doi:10.1080/15732471003594427.
4. Paik J.K., Frieze P.A. Ship structural safety and reliability. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 2001, 3:198-210. 10.1002/pse.74.
5. Akpan U.O., Koko T.S., Ayyub B., Dunbar T.E. Risk assessment of aging ship hull structures in the presence of corrosion and fatigue. Marine Structures 2002, 15:211-231.
6. Hussein W., Guedes Soares C. Reliability and residual strength of double hull tankers designed according to the new IACS common structural rules. Ocean Engineering 2009, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.04.006.
7. Ayyub B.M., Assakkaf I.A., Atua K.I. Reliability-Based load and resistance factor design (LRFD) of hull girders for surface ships. Naval Engineers Journal 2000, 112:279-296.
8. Lua J., Hess P.E. First-failure-based reliability assessment and sensitivity analysis of a naval vessel under hogging. Journal of Ship Research 2006, 50:158-170.
9. Decò A, Frangopol DM, Okasha NM. Time-variant redundancy of ship structures, submitted for publication.
10. Okasha N.M., Frangopol D.M. Efficient method based on optimization and simulation for the probabilistic strength computation of the ship hull. Journal of Ship Research 2010, 54(4):1-13.
11. Hughes O.F. Ship structural design - a rationally-based, computed-aided, optimization approach 1983, Wiley & Sons, New York.
12. Luís M., Teixeira A.P., Guedes Soares C. Longitudinal strength reliability of a tanker hull accidentally grounded. Structural Safety 2009, 31:224-233.
13. Ang A.H.-S., Tang W.H. Probability concepts in engineering planning and design. Decision, risk and reliability 1984, vol. II. Wiley & Sons, New York.
14. MathWorks Signal processing toolbox™ 6-User's Guide 2009, The MathWorks, Inc., 1427 pp.
15. Mansour A.E., Hovem L. Probability-based ship structural safety analysis. Journal of Ship Research 1994, 38:329-339.
16. Ang A.H.-S., Tang W.H. Probability concepts in engineering. Emphasis on applications to civil and environmental engineering 2007, Wiley & Sons, New York. 2nd ed.
17. Fink D. A compendium of conjugate priors. In Progress Report: Extension and enhancement of methods for setting data quality objectives; 1995, (DOE contract 95-831).
18. Bucher C. Computational analysis of randomness in structural mechanics. Structures & infrastructures series 2009, vol. 3:248. CRC Press - Balkema - Taylor & Francis, Leiden, The Netherlands. D.M. Frangopol (Ed.).
19. Coles S.G., Powell E.A. Bayesian methods in extreme value modelling: a review and new developments. International Statistical Review 1996, 64:119-136.
20. Okasha NM, Frangopol DM. Integration of structural health monitoring in a system performance based life-cycle bridge management framework. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Taylor & Francis, in press, doi:10.1080/15732479.2010.485726. doi:10.1080/15732479.2010.485726.
21. Neal R.M. Slice sampling, the annals of statistics. Institute of Mathematical Statistics 2003, 31:705-741.
22. Olsson A., Sandberg G., Dahlblom O. On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis. Structural Safety 2003, 25:47-68.
23. Liu P.L., Lin H.Z., Der Kiureghian A. CALREL User Manual 1983, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
24. Devine E.A. An overview of the recently-completed JHSS Monohull and Trimaran structural seaways loads test program 30 October, 2009, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division (NSWCCD) PowerPoint Briefing.