Priority questions to shape the marine and coastal policy research agenda in the United Kingdom

Marine Policy

Volumn 38, Issue , 2013, Pages 531-537

  Rees, Siân ^a   Fletcher, Stephen ^a   Glegg, Gillian ^a   Marshall, Charlotte ^a,b   Rodwell, Lynda ^a   Jefferson, Rebecca ^a   Campbell, Maria ^a   Langmead, Olivia ^a,b   Ashley, Matthew ^a,c   Bloomfield, Helen ^d   Brutto, Daniel ^e   Colenutt, Andrew ^f,g   Conversi, Alessandra ^a,h,i   Earll, Bob ^j   Hattam, Caroline ^c   Ingram, Simon ^a   McKinley, Emma ^k   Mee, Laurence ^l   Oates, Jenny ^m   Peckett, Francis ^a   Portus, Jim ⁿ   Reed, Martin ^a   Rogers, Stuart ^o   Saunders, Justine ^p   Scales, Kylie ^c   Wynn, Russel ^g   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b THE LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^c PLYMOUTH MARINE LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^e Marine Ecological Surveys Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^f New Forest District Council   (United Kingdom)

^g NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHY CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^h CNR National Research Council of Italy   (Italy)

ⁱ THE LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^j University of Chichester ^*  (United Kingdom)

^k UNIVERSITY OF CHICHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^l SCOTTISH MARINE INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^m JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE   (United Kingdom)

ⁿ Fisheries and Aquaculture Science ^*  (United Kingdom)

^o CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT   (United Kingdom)

^p Emu Ltd   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Data; Ecosystem services; Governance; Marine citizenship; Marine conservation; Marine planning

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH; EUROPEAN UNION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; MARINE POLICY; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84879888510     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ramsar. Convention on Wetlands of international importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat. As amended by the Paris Protocol, 3 December 1982, and Regina Amendments, 28 May 1987. In: 14583 UTSN, editor. Ramsar (Iran) 1971.
2. OSPAR Convention Convention for the protection of the marine environment of the North-East Atlantic. In: Commission O, editor. 2002.
3. United Nations. The Convention on Biological Diveristy. In: Nations U, editor. 1992. p. 30.
4. European Community Council Directive. Conservation of habitats and wild fauna and flora. In: communities TCoE, editor. EC 92/43/EEC 1992.
5. European Parliament and Council. Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) In: Parliment TE, editor. 2008. p. 22.
6. Defra. Safeguarding our Seas-a strategy for the conservation and sustainable development of our marine environment. London 2002.
7. HM Government. Marine and Coastal Access Act. Crown copyright; 2009. p. 347.
8. Marine (Scotland) Act Crown copyright 2010. p. 112.
9. Department of the Environment. A Northern Ireland Marine Bill-policy proposals. Planning and Natural Resources Department (Department of the Environment); 2010. p. 81.
10. HM Government. UK Marine Policy Statement. London: Crown copyright; 2011. p. 47.
11. Sutherland WJ, Pullin AS, Dolman PM, Knight TM The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 2004, 19:305-308.
12. Pullin AS, Knight TM Support for decision making in conservation practice: an evidence-based approach. J Nat Conserv 2003, 11:83-90.
13. Leslie HM, McLeod KL Confronting the challenges of implementing marine ecosystem-based management. Front Ecol Environ 2007, 5:540-548.
14. Boesch DF The role of science in ocean governance. Ecol Eng 1999, 31:189-198.
15. Halpern BS, Diamond J, Gaines S, Gelcich S, Gleason M, Jennings S, et al. Near-term priorities for the science, policy and practice of Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning (CMSP). Mar Policy 2011, 36:198-205.
16. Sutherland WJ, Adams WM., Aronson RB, Aveling R, Blackburn TM, Broad S, et al. One hundred questions of importance to the Conservation of Global Biological Diversity Cien Preguntas de Importancia para la Conservación de la Diversidad Biológica Global. Conserv Biol 2009, 23:557-567.
17. Sutherland WJ, Armstrong-Brown S, Armsworth PR, Tom B, Brickland J, Campbell CD, et al. The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. J Appl Ecol 2006, 43:617-627.
18. Rudd MA, Beazley KF, Cooke SJ, Fleishman E, Lane DE, Mascia MB, et al. Generation of priority research questions to inform conservation policy and management at a national level Generación de Preguntas de Investigación Prioritarias para Informar a las Políticas y Gestión de la Conservación a Nivel Nacional. Conserv Biol 2011, 25:476-484.
19. Pretty J, Sutherland WJ, Ashby J, Auburn J, Baulcombe D, Bell M The top 100 questions for global agriculture and food. Int J Agric Sustainability 2010, 8:219-236.
20. Sutherland WJ, Albon SD, Allison H, Armstrong-Brown S, Bailey MJ, Bereton T The identification of priority opportunities for UK nature conservation policy. J Appl Ecol 2010, 47:955-965.
21. Sutherland WJ, Clout M, Cote' IM, Daszak P, Depledge MH A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2010. Trends Ecol Evol 2010, 25:1-7.
22. Sutherland WJ, Fleishman E, Mascia MB, Pretty J, Rudd MA Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods Ecol Evol 2011, 2:238-247.
23. Marshall C, Howell K, Glegg G 2011 Species distribution modelling for offshore marine planning: data issues challenges and recommendations. Plymouth University PhD thesis 2011.
24. Beaumont NJ, Austen MC, Atkins JP, Burdon D, Degraer S, Dentinho TP, et al. Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Mar Pollut Bull 2007, 54:253-265.
25. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. The millennium ecosystem assessment series. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute; 2005. p. 155.
26. Austen MC, Malcolm SJ, Frost M, Hattam C, Mangi S, Stentford G, et al. Marine the UK national ecosystem assessment technical report: UNEP-WCMC; 2011.
27. Rees SE, Rodwell LD, Attrill MJ, Austen MC, Mangi SC The value of marine biodiversity to the leisure and recreation industry and its application to marine spatial planning. Mar Policy 2010, 34:868-875.
28. Fletcher S, Saunders J, Herbert R Description of the ecosystem services provided by broad-scale habitats and features of conservation importance that are likely to be protected by marine protected areas in the Marine Conservation Zone project area. Natural England research report RP03342011.
29. OSPAR Commission. Guidance on developing an ecologically coherent network of OSPAR marine protected areas (Reference number 2006-3). OSPAR Convention for the protection of the marine environment of the North East Atlantic; 2006. p. 11.
30. Fletcher S, Potts J Ocean citizenship: an emergent geographical concept. Coast Manage 2007, 35:511-524.
31. Matti S The imagined environmental citizen: exploring the state-individual relationship in Swedish environmental policy 2006, Lulea University of Technology.
32. Cruz JM Dyanamics of supply chain networks with corporate social responsibility through integrated environmental decision making. Eur J Oper Res 2008, 184:1005-1031.
33. Donert K Aspects of European citizenship and environmental education through information and communications technology. First international conference on environmental research and assessment. Bucharest, Romania 2003.
34. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environ Educ Res 2002, 8:239-260.
35. Jefferson RL Communicating marine environmental health: connecting science, social and policy values 2010, University of Plymouth, Plymouth.
36. Leiberknecht LM, Hooper TEJ, Mullier TM, Murphy A, Neilly M, Carr H, et al. Finding sanctuary final report and recommendations. A report submitted by the finding sanctuary stakeholder project to Defra, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and Natural England 2011, 101.
37. Irish Sea Conservation zones. Final recommendations for Marine Conservation Zones in the the Irish Sea. Warrington 2011. p. 53.
38. Net Gain. Final recommendations. Submission to Natural England and JNCC. Hull 2011. p. 880.
39. Balanced Seas. Marine conservation zones project. Final recommendations. 2011. p. 78.
40. Douvere F, Ehler CN New perspectives on sea use management: initial findings from European experience with marine spatial planning. J Environ Manage 2009, 90:77-88.
41. Commission of the European Communities. An Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union. Brussels: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.; 2007.
42. Rees SE, Attrill MJ, Austen MC, Mangi SC, Richards JP, Rodwell L.D. Is there a win-win scenario for marine nature conservation? A case study of Lyme Bay, England. Ocean Coast Manage 2010, 53:135-145.
43. McShane TO, Hirsch PD, Trung TC, Songorwa AN, Kinzig A, Monteferri B, et al. Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biolog Conserv 2011, 144:966-972.
44. Christie P Creating space for interdisciplinary Marine and Coastal Research: five dilemmas and suggested resolutions. Environ Conserv 2011, 38:172-186.
45. Commission of the European Communities. Communication from the Commission-Roadmap for Maritime Spatial Planning: achieving common principles in the EU. COM (2008). Brussels. 2008. p. 791.
46. Munda G, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P Qualitative multicriteria evaluation for environmental management. Ecol Econ 1994, 10:97-112.
47. Calado H, Ng K, Johnson D, Sousa L, Phillips M, Alves F Marine spatial planning: lessons learned from the Portuguese debate. Mar Policy 2010, 34:1341-1349.
48. European Commission. An integrated maritime strategy for the European Union. Brussels: European Community; 2007. p. 575.
49. House C, Phillips MR Integrating the science education nexus into coastal governance: a Mediterranean and Black Sea case study. Mar Policy 2012, 36:495-501.
50. Lédée EJI, Sutton SG, Tobin RC, De Freitas DM Responses and adaptation strategies of commercial and charter fishers to zoning changes in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Mar Policy 2012, 36:226-234.
51. Banks SA, Skilleter GA Implementing marine reserve networks: a comparison of approaches in New South Wales (Australia) and New Zealand. Mar Policy 2010, 34:197-207.
52. Stamieszkin K, Wielgus J, Gerber LR Management of a marine protected area for sustainability and conflict resolution: lessons from Loreto Bay National Park (Baja California Sur, Mexico). Ocean Coast Manage 2009, 52:449-458.
53. Christie P Marine protected areas as biological successes and social failures in South East Asia. Am Fish Soc Symp 2004, 42:155-164.
54. Mascia MB, Claus CA, Naidoo R Impacts of marine protected areas on fishing communities. Conserv Biol 2010, 24:1424-1429.
55. Ruckelshaus M, Klinger T, Knowlton N, DeMaster DP Marine ecosystem-based management in practice: scientific and governance challenges. BioScience 2008, 58:53-63.