How to evaluate the practical relevance of business process compliance checking approaches?

Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012 - Tagungsband der MKWI 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 849-861

  Becker, Jörg ^a   Eggert, Mathias ^a   Schwittay, Sebastian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS COMPLIANCES; COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY SECTORS; LAWS AND REGULATIONS; LEGAL REGULATION; LEGAL REQUIREMENTS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

COMPLIANCE CONTROL;

EID: 84879852282     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Abdullah, N. S.; Sadiq, S.; Indulska, M. (2010): Emerging Challenges in Information Systems Research for Regulatory Compliance Management In: B. Pernici (Ed.), Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
2. Baskerville, R. L.; Wod-Harper, A. T. (1996): A Critical Perspective on Action Research as a Method for Information Systems Research. Journal of Information Technology 11 (3): 235-246.
3. Benbasat, I.; Barki, H. (2007): Quo vadis TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8 (4).
4. Boudreau, M.-C.; Gefen, D.; Straub, D. W. (2001): Validation in Information Systems Research: A State-of-the-Art Assessment. MIS Quarterly 25 (1): 1-16.
5. Compeau, D. R.; Higgins, C. A. (1995): Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Quarterly 19 (2): 189-211.
6. Davis, F. D.; Bagozzi, R. P.; Warshaw, P. R. (1989): User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management science 35 (8): 982-1003.
7. de Ruyter, K. (1996): Focus versus nominal group interviews: a comparative analysis. Marketing intelligence & planning 14 (6): 44-50.
8. Eisenhardt, K. M.; Martin, J. A. (2000): Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal 21 (10-11): 1105-1121.
9. El Kharbili, M.; Pulvermueller, E. (2009): A Semantic Framework for Compliance Management in Business Process Management. 2nd International Conference of Business Process and Service Computing, Leipzig, Germany.
10. Gibson, M.; Arnott, D. (2007): The Use of Focus Groups in Design Science Research. Australian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2007).
11. Hevner, A. R.; March, S. T.; Park, J.; Ram, S. (2004): Design Science in Information Systems Research. Mis Quarterly 28 (1): 75-105.
12. Kaplan, B.; Maxwell, J. A. (2005): Qualitative Research Methods for Evaluating Computer Information Systems. In: J. G. Anderson & C. E. Aydin (Eds.), Evaluation the Organizational Impact of Healthcare Information Systems. New York: Springer.
13. Karagiannis, D. (2008): A business process-based modelling extension for regulatory compliance. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, Munich, Germany.
14. Kidd, P. S.; Parshall, M. B. (2000): Getting the Focus and the Group: Enhancing Analytical Rigor in Focus Group Research. Qualitative Health Research 10 (3): 293-308.
15. Kontio, J.; Lehtola, L.; Bragge, J. (2004): Using the Focus Group Method in Software Engineering: Obtaining Practitioner and User Experiences. International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, Los Alamitos, CA, USA.
16. Krueger, R. A. (1998): Developing questions for focus groups (Vol. 3): Sage Publications.
17. Ly, L.; Rinderle-Ma, S.; Göser, K.; Dadam, P. (2009): On enabling integrated process compliance with semantic constraints in process management systems Requirements, challenges, solutions. Information Systems Frontier Online veröffentlicht: http://www.springerlink.com/content/g7084rn082w15455/ fulltext.pdf.
18. Massey, A. P.; Wells, T. M. (2008): ICT Perceptions and Meanings: Implications for Knowledge Transfer. 41. Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Waikoloa, Big Island, Hawaii.
19. McKnight, H.; Carter, M.; Clay, P. (2009): Trust in Technology: Development of a Set of Constructs and Measures. 14th Workshop on Diffusion Interest Group in Information Technology, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
20. Mueller, J. (2010): Strukturbasierte Verifikation von BPMN-Modellen. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Tübingen, Tübingen.
21. Myers, G. (1998): Displaying opinions: Topics and disagreement in focus groups. Language in Society 27 (1): 85-111.
22. Mykytyn, K.; Mykytyn, P. P.; Slinkman, C. W. (1990): Expert Systems: A Question of Liability. MIS Quarterly 14 (1): 27-42.
23. Namiri, K.; Stojanovic, N. (2007): Pattern-based Design and Validation of Business Process Compliance. In: R. Meersman & Z. Tari (Eds.), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2007: CoopIS,DOA, ODBASE, GADA, and IS 2007. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
24. Niehaves, B.; Plattfaut, R.; Becker, J. (2010): Does Your Business Process Management (Still) Fit the Market? - A Dynamic Capability Perspective on BPM Strategy Development. Proceedings of the 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems. Lima, Peru.
25. Onsrud, H. J. (1999): Liability in the use of geographic information systems and geographic datasets. In: Geographical Information Systems (Vol. 2 Management Issues and Applications, pp. 643-652): John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
26. Patton, M. G. (2002): Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CF: Sage Publications.
27. Peffers, K.; Tuunanen, T.; Rothenberger, M. A.; Chatterjee, S. (2007): A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24 (3): 45-77.
28. PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2011): Industry sentiment - Financial Services Survey. Retrieved 08/07/2011, 2011, from http://www.pwc.com/en-GX/gx/financial- services/cbi-pwc-survey/pdf/CBI-PwC-FS-survey.pdf.
29. Purao, S.; Storey, V. C. (2008): Evaluating the adoption potential of design science efforts: The case of APSARA. Decision Support Systems 44 (2): 369-381.
30. Recker, J. (2011): Qualitative Analysis In: J. Recker (Ed.), Evaluations of Process Modeling Grammars. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
31. Riege, C.; Saat, J.; Bucher, T. (2009): Systematisierung von Evaluationsmethoden in der gestaltungsorientierten Wirtschaftsinformatik. In: J. Becker, H. Krcmar & B. Niehaves (Eds.), Wissenschaftstheorie und gestaltungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatik (pp. 69-86). Heidelberg: Physica.
32. Rikhardsson, P.; Best, P.; Green, P.; Rosemann, M. (2006): Business Process Risk Management, Compliance and Internal Control: A Research Agenda. Second Asia/Pacific Research Symposium on Accounting Information Systems. University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
33. Rosemann, M.; de Bruin, T. (2005): Towards a business process management maturity model. Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems. Regensburg, Germany.
34. Stewart, D. W.; Shamdasani, P. N.; Rook, D. W. (2007): Focus groups: Theory and practice: Sage Publications.
35. Teece, D. J.; Pisano, G.; Shuen, A. (1997): Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509-533.
36. Tremblay, M. C.; Hevner, A. R.; Berndt, D. J. (2010): Focus Groups for Artifact Refinement and Evaluation in Design Research. Communications of the ACM 26 (1): 600-618.
37. Tremblay, M. C.; Hevner, A. R.; Berndt, D. J. (2010): The Use of Focus Groups in Design Science Research. In: Design Research in Information Systems (pp. 121-143). Boston, MA: Springer.
38. Venkatesh, V.; Bala, H. (2008): Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences 39 (2): 273-315.
39. Venkatesh, V.; Davis, F. D. (2000): A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science 46 (2): 186-204.
40. Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M. G.; Davis, G. B.; Davis, F. D. (2003): User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View (Vol. 27, pp. 425-478).
41. Webster, J.; Martocchio, J. J. (1992): Microcomputer Playfulness: Development of a Measure with Workplace Implications. MIS Quarterly 16 (2): 201-226.
42. Zentes, U.; Wybitul , T. (2011): Interne Sicherungsmaßnahmen und datenschutzrechtliche Grenzen bei Kreditinstituten sowie anderen Instituten des Finanzwesens. Corporate Compliance Zeitschrift 4 (3): 91-95.