Evaluating the adoption potential of design science efforts: The case of APSARA

Decision Support Systems

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 369-381

  Purao, Sandeep ^a   Storey, Veda C ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

APSARA; Conceptual design; Reuse; Technology acceptance

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; INNOVATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EVALUATION MECHANISM; REUSE-BASED DESIGN; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM);

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 36248952653     PISSN: 01679236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2007.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Adams D.A., Nelson R.R., and Todd P.A. Perceived usefulness, ease of use and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly 16 2 (1992) 227-247
2. APSARA. Heuristics for automated pattern retrieval and synthesis (2005). http://purao.ist.psu.edu/APSARA/heuristics Available at http://purao.ist.psu.edu/APSARA/heuristics. Accessed 15 June 2005
3. Bansler J., and Havn E. Sharing best practices: an empirical study of it-support for knowledge sharing. The 9th European Conference on Information Systems (June 27-29 2001), Bled, Slovenia
4. Batra D., and Davis J. Conceptual data modeling in database design: similarities and differences between expert and novice designers. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies vol. 37 (1992) 83-101
5. Bosch J. Design and Use of Software Architectures: Adopting and Evolving a Product-Line Approach (2000), Addison Wesley
6. Bouzeghoub M. Using expert systems in schema design. In: Loucopoulos P., and Zicari R. (Eds). Conceptual Modelling, Databases, and CASE (1992), Wiley 465-487
7. Bubenko Jr. J.A., and Wangler B. Research directions in conceptual specification development. Chapter 17. In: Loucopolous P., and Zicari R. (Eds). Conceptual Modeling, Databases, and CASE: An Integrated View of Information Systems Development (1992), Wiley
8. Chen P. The entity-relationship model-toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 1 1 (March 1976) 9-36
9. Chin W., and Gopal A. Adoption intention in GSS: relative importance of beliefs. DataBase for Advances in Information Systems 26 2,3 (May/August 1995) 42-64
10. Coad P., et al. Object Models: Strategies, Patterns, & Applications (1995), Prentice Hall
11. Codd E.F. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Communications of the ACM 13 6 (1970) 377-387
12. Cole W.G. Metaphor graphics and visual analogy for medical data. InfoFair (April 1988), Salt Lake City
13. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 3 (September 1989) 319-339
14. Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38 (1993) 1-13
15. Davis F.D., and Venkatesh V. Toward pre-prototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 51 1 (2004) 31-46
16. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 8 (August 1989) 982-1003
17. De Sutter B., De Bus B., and De Bosschere K. Sifting out the mud: low level C++ code reuse. ACM SIGPLAN Notices. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications vol. 37(11) (2002)
18. Fischer G. Cognitive view of reuse and design. IEEE Software (July 1987) 22-39
19. Fishbein M., and Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975), Addison-Wesley, Boston
20. Fishman R., and Kemerer C. The assimilation of process innovations: an organizational learning perspective. Management Science 43 10 (1997) 1345-1363
21. Frakes W.B., and Terry C. Software reuse: metrics and models. ACM Computing Surveys 28 2 (1996) 415-435
22. Fromkin H.L., and Streufert S. Laboratory Experimentation. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1976), Rand McNally Publishing Company, Inc., Chicago IL
23. Gaedke M., and Rehse J. Supporting compositional reuse in component-based web engineering. 2000 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2000), Villa Olmo, Como, Italy (March 2000) 19-21
24. Garey M., and Johnson D. Computers and Intractability (1979), Freeman, San Francisco, CA
25. Gefen D., Straub D., and Boudreau M. Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Communications of the AIS 4 7 (August 2000)
26. Gentner D. Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7 2 (1983) 155-170
27. Gibbs C.W. Software's chronic crisis. Scientific American (Sept. 1994) 86-95
28. T. Goette. Determining Factors in the Successful Use of Adaptive Technology by Individuals with Disabilities: A Field Study. Unpublished Dissertation, Georgia State University (1995).
29. Griss M.L. Software reuse: from library to factory. IBM Systems Journal 32 4 (1993) 548-566
30. Guindon R.D. Designing the design process: exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human-Computer Interaction 5 (1990) 305-344
31. Hardgrave B.C., and Johnson R.A. Towards an information systems development acceptance model: the case of object-oriented systems development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50 3 (August 2003) 322-336
32. Hardgrave B.C., Davis F.D., and Riemenschneider C.K. Investigating determinants of software developers' intentions to follow methodologies. Journal of Management Information Systems 20 1 (Summer 2003) 123-151
33. Hendrickson A.R., Massey P.D., and Cronan T.P. On the test-retest reliability of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use scales. MIS Quarterly 17 2 (1993) 227-230
34. Hevner A., March S., Park J., and Ram S. Design science research in information systems. MIS Quarterly 28 1 (March 2004) 75-105
35. Irwin G. The role of similarity in the reuse of object-oriented analysis models. Journal of Management Information Systems 19 2 (2002) 219-248
36. Iivari J., Hirschheim R., and Klein H. A paradigmatic analysis contrasting information systems development approaches and methodologies. Information Systems Research 9 2 (1998) 164-193
37. Iversen J., Mathiassen L., and Nielsen P.A. Managing risks in software process improvement: an action research approach. MIS Quarterly 28 3 (2004) 395-433
38. Jacobson I., Griss M., and Johnsson P. Software Reuse: Architecture Process and Organization for Business Success (1997), Addison Wesley
39. Joel K. The Not-Invented-Here Syndrome in Software Development Practice (2004). http://www.joelonsoftware.com/printerFriendly/articles/fog0000000007.html http://www.joelonsoftware.com/printerFriendly/articles/fog0000000007.html. Accessed on 15 September 2004
40. Johannesson P., and Wohed P. The deontic pattern - a framework for domain analysis in information systems design. Data and Knowledge Engineering 31 2 (1999) 135-153
41. E. Karahana. Evaluative Criteria and User Acceptance of End-User Information Technology: A Study of End User Cognitive and Affective Processes. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Minnesota (1993).
42. Krueger C. Software reuse. ACM Computing Surveys vol. 24. No. 2 (June 1993) 131-184
43. Kwon O.B., and Park S.J. RMT: a modeling support system for model reuse. Decision Support Systems 16 2 (February 1996) 131-153
44. Lenat D., et al. CYC: toward programs with common sense. Communications of the ACM. Special Issue on Natural Language Processing vol. 33. No. 8 (Aug. 1990) 30-49
45. Lloyd-Williams M. Exploiting domain knowledge during the automated design of object-oriented databases. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER'97), Los Angeles (November 3-6 1997), Springer-Verlag
46. Lloyd-Williams M., and Beynon-Davis P. Expert systems for database design: a comparative review. Artificial Intelligence Review 6 3 (1992) 263-283
47. M. Lowry and R. McCartney. 1991. eds. Automating Software Design. AAAI Press/MIT Press (1991).
48. Maiden A., and Sutcliffe C. Exploiting reusable specifications through analogy. Communications of the ACM vol. 35. No. 4 (April 1993) 55-64
49. Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research 2 3 (1991) 173-191
50. Mili H., et al. Reusing software: issues and research directions. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (June 1995) 528-562
51. Moore G.C., and Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 2 3 (1991) 192-222
52. Morel B., and Alexander P. Automating component adaptation for reuse. Proceedings. 18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2003 (Oct. 6-10 2003) 142-151
53. Morisio M., Ezran M., and Tully C. Success and failure factors in software reuse. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28 4 (April 2002) 340-357
54. Nance W.D., and Straub D.W. An investigation of task-technology fit and information technology choices in knowledge work. Journal of Information Technology Management 7:3 & 4 (1996) 1-14
55. Nunamaker J. Going the last mile: the opportunity to create valuable knowledge. Keynote speech at the Workshop of Information Technologies and Systems (December 15 2001)
56. Orlikowski W.J. CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly 17 3 (1993) 309-340
57. Prietula M.J., and Simon H.A. The experts in your midst. Harvard Business Review (Jan-Feb. 1989) 120-124
58. Purao S. A web-based tool to automate system design via intelligent pattern retrieval and synthesis. Data Base 29 4 (Fall 1998) 45-57
59. Purao S., and Storey V. Intelligent support for retrieval and synthesis of patterns for object-oriented design. Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling- ER'97 (November 2 - 7 1997), Sringer-Verlag, Los Angeles, California
60. Purao S., Storey V., and Han T. Improving analysis pattern reuse in conceptual design: augmenting automated processes with supervised learning. Information Systems Research 14 3 (Sept. 2003) 269-290
61. Ramesh M., and Raghav Rao H. Software reuse: issues and an example. Decision Support Systems 12 1 (August 1994) 57-77
62. Rational. http://www.ibm.com/rational. Accessed, 15 June 2005.
63. Ravichandran T., and Rothenberger M.A. Software reuse strategies and component markets. Communications of the ACM 46 8 (2003) 109-114
64. Riemenschneider C.K., Hardgrave B.C., and Davis F.D. Explaining developer acceptance of formal software methodologies: a comparison of five theoretical models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28 12 (December 2002) 1135-1145
65. Rose G., and Straub D.W. Predicting general IT use: applying TAM to the Arabic world. Journal of Global Information Management 6 3 (Summer 1998) 39-46
66. Rothenberger M. Project-level reuse factors: drivers for variation within software development environments. Decision Sciences Journal 34 1 (Winter 2003)
67. Rothenberger M., and Dooley K.J. A performance measure for software reuse projects. Decision Sciences Journal 30 4 (Fall 1999) 1131-1153
68. Rothenberger M., Dooley K.J., Kulkarni U.R., and Nada N. Strategies for software reuse: a principal component analysis of reuse practices. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (September 2003)
69. Rouse W.B., and Morris N.M. On looking into the black box: prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin vol. 100(3) (1986) 349-361
70. Storey V.C., Thompson C., and Ram S. Understanding database design expertise. Data and Knowledge Engineering 16 (August 1995) 97-124
71. Storey V.C., Goldstein R.C., Chiang R.L., Dey D., and Sundaresan S. Database design with common sense business reasoning and learning. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 22 4 (December 1997) 471-512
72. Szyperski M. Component-based Software Engineering (1999), Addison-Wesley
73. Venkatesh V., and Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management. Science 46 2 (2000) 186-204
74. Vinze A., and Karma S. Domain engineering for developing software repositories: a case study. Decision Support Systems 33 1 (May 2002) 55-69
75. Wohed P. Conceptual patterns for reuse in information systems analysis. Proceedings of CAiSE (2000) 157-175 Stockholm, Sweden
76. Wu I., and Chen J. An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: an empirical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62 6 (June 2005) 784-808
77. Yang H., and Yoo Y. It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decision Support Systems 38 1 (October 2004) 19-31
78. Zave P., and Jackson M. Conjunction as composition. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 2 4 (October 1993) 379-411