Moral realism and the heuristics debate

Journal of Legal Analysis

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 339-397

  Kelman, Mark ^a  

^a STANFORD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879814760     PISSN: 21617201     EISSN: 19465319     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jla/lat004     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Alexander, Joshua. 2012. Experimental Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press
2. Baron, Jonathan, & Ilana Ritov. 1993. Intuitions about Penalties and Compensation in the Context of Tort Law. J. Risk & Uncertainty 7, 17-33
3. Baron, Jonathan, & Ilana Ritov. 2009. Protected Values and Omission Bias as Deontological Judgments. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 50, 133-167
4. Baron, Jonathan, Burca Grucay, Adam B. Moore, & Katrin Starcke. 2012. Use of a Rasch Model to Predict Response Times to Utilitarian Moral Dilemmas. Synthese 189, 107-117
5. Bartels, Daniel. 2008. Principled Moral Sentiment and the Flexibility of Moral Judgment and Decision Making. Cognition 108, 381-417
6. Bartels, Daniel M., & David A. Pizarro. 2011. The Mismeasure of Morals: Antisocial Personality Traits Predict Utilitarian Responses to Moral Dilemmas. Cognition 121, 154-161
7. Bartsch, Karen, & Jennifer Cole Wright. 2005. Towards an Intuitionist Account of Moral Development. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28, 546-547
8. Berker, Selim. 2009. The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience. Philosophy & Public Affairs 37, 293-329
9. Birnbaum, Michael H. 2008. New Tests of Cumulative Prospect Theory and the Priority Heuristic: Probability-outcome Tradeoff with Branch Splitting. Judgment and Decision Making 3, 304-316
10. Brandstatter, Eduard, Gerd Gigerenzer, & Ralph Hertwig. 2006. The Priority Heuristic: Making Choices without Trade-Offs. Psychol. Rev. 113, 409-432
11. Cappelen, Herman. 2012. Philosophy without Intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press
12. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger
13. Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
14. Coase, R.H. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. J.L. & Econ. 3, 1-44
15. Cushman, Fiery, Liane Young, & Marc Hauser. 2006. The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment: Testing Three Principles of Harm. Psychological Science 17, 1082-1089
16. Dana, Jason, & Robyn M. Dawes. 2004. The Superiority of Simple Alternatives to Regression for Social Science Prediction. J. Educ. & Behavioral Stat. 29, 317-331
17. Darley, John M., & Daniel C. Batson. 1973. From Jerusalem to Jericho: A Study of Situational and Dispositional Variables in Helping Behavior. J. Person. & Social Psychol. 27, 100-108
18. Dawes, Robyn M., & Bernard Corrigan. 1974. Linear Models in Decision Making. Psychological Bulletin 81, 95-106
19. de Waal, Frans. 2006. Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved. Princeton: Princeton University Press
20. Driver, Julia. 2008. Attributes of Causation and Moral Responsibility. In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology (vol. 2): The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 423-439
21. Epstein, Richard. 1973. A Theory of Strict Liability. J. Legal Stud. 2, 151-204
22. Epstein, Richard. 1974. Defenses and Subsequent Pleas in a System of Strict Liability. J. Legal Stud. 3, 165-215
23. Finnis, John. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press
24. Finnis, John. 1995. Law, Morality, and 'Sexual Orientation.'. Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 9, 11-39
25. Fodor, Jerry A. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press
26. Fodor, Jerry. 2000. The Mind Doesn't Work That Way. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
27. Fried, Barbara. 2005. Moral Heuristics and the Means/End Distinction. Behav. & Brain Sci. 28, 549-550
28. Fried, Barbara. 2012a. Can Contractualism Save Us from Aggregation? J. Ethics 16, 39-66
29. Fried, Barbara. 2012b. What Does Matter? The Case for Killing the Trolley Problem (or Letting it Die). Philos. Quart. 60, 505-529
30. Fried, Barbara. 2012c. The Limits of a Nonconsequentialist Approach to Torts. Legal Theory 18, 231-262
31. Gerrig, Richard J. 2005. Moral Judgments in Narrative Context. Behav. & Brain Scie. 28, 550-550
32. Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2002. The Adaptive Toolbox. In Gerd Gigerenzer, & Reinhard Selten (eds.), Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 37-49
33. Goldstein, Daniel C., & Gerd Gigerenzer. 2002. Models of Ecological Rationality: The Recognition Heuristic. Psychol. Rev. 109, 75-90
34. Greene, Joshua D. 2003. From Neural 'Is' to Moral 'Ought': What are the Moral Implications of Neuroscientific Moral Psychology? Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 4, 847-850
35. Greene, Joshua. 2008a. The Secret Joke of Kant's Soul. In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology vol. 3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 35-79
36. Greene, Joshua. 2008b. Response to Mikhail and Timmons. In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology vol. 3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 105-118
37. Greene, Joshua D., R. Brian Sommerville, Leigh E. Nystrom, John M. Darley, & Jonathan D. Cohen. 2001. An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment. Science 293, 2105-2108
38. Greene, Joshua, & Jonathan Haidt. 2002. How (and where) does Moral Judgment Work? Trends Cog. Sci. 6, 517-523
39. Greene, Joshua D., Leigh E. Nystrom, A. D. Engell, J. M. Darley, & Jonathan D. Cohen. 2004. The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment. Neuron 44, 389-400
40. Greene, Joshua D., Sylvia A. Morelli, Kelly Loewenberg, Leigh E. Nystrom, & Jonathan D. Cohen. 2008. Cognitive Load Selectively Interferes with Utilitarian Moral Judgments. Cognition 107, 1144-1154
41. Greene, Joshua D., Fiery Cushman, Lisa E. Stewart, Kelly Loewenberg, Leigh E. Nystrom, & Jonathan D. Cohen. 2009. Pushing Moral Buttons: The Interaction between Personal Force and Intention in Moral Judgment. Cognition 111, 364-371
42. Hahn, Uriek, John-Mark Frost, & Greg Maio. 2005. What's in a Heuristic? Behav. & Brain Sci. 28, 551-552
43. Hart, H.L.A., & Tony Honore. 1986. Causation and the Law, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press
44. Hauser, Marc D. 2006. Moral Minds. New York: HarperCollins
45. Hauser, Marc D., Fiery Cushman, Liane Young, R. Kang-Xing Jin, & John Mikhail. 2007. A Dissociation between Moral Judgments and Justification. Mind and Language 22, 1-22
46. Hohfeld, Wesley. 1913. Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied to Judicial Reasoning. Yale L. J. 23, 16-59
47. Huebner, Bryce, & Marc Hauser. 2011. Moral Judgments about Altruistic Self-Sacrifice: When Philosophical and Folk Intuitions Clash. Philosophical Psychology 24, 73-94
48. Isen, Alice M., & Paula F. Levin. 1972. The Effect of Feeling Good on Helping: Cookies and Kindness. J. Person. & Social Psychol. 21, 294-301
49. Kahneman, Daniel, & Amos Tversky. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 47, 263-291
50. Kahneman, Daniel, & Amos Tversky. 2002. Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment. In Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin, & Daniel Kahneman (eds.), Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19-48
51. Kelman, Mark. 1981. Interpretive Construction in the Substantive Criminal Law. Stan. L. Rev. 33, 591-673
52. Kelman, Mark. 1987. The Necessary Myth of Objective Causation Judgments in Liberal Political Theory. Chicago-Kent L. Rev. 63, 579-637
53. Kelman, Mark. 2005. Thinking about Sexual Consent. Stan. L. Rev. 58, 935-987
54. Kelman, Mark. 2011. The Heuristics Debate. New York: Oxford University Press
55. Kelman, Mark. 2013. Intuitions. Stan. L. Rev. 65, 1291-1323
56. Kelman, Mark, & Nicholas R. Kelman 2011. Objections to the Fast and Frugal Program. In Mark Kelman (ed.), The Heuristics Debate. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 90-106
57. Kelman, Mark, & Tamar Admati Kreps. 2012. Playing with Trolleys (I): Intuitions about Aggregation; Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2138475
58. Kitcher, Philip. 2006. Ethics and Evolution: How to Get Here from There. In Frans de Waal (ed.), Primates and Philosophers. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 120-139
59. Knobe, Joshua, & Ben Fraser 2008. Causal Judgment and Moral Judgment: Two Experiments. In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology (vol. 2): The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 441-447
60. Koenigs, Michael, Liane Young, Ralph Adolphs, Daniel Tranel, Fiery Cushman, Marc Hauser, & Antonio Damasio. 2007. Damage to the Prefrontal Cortex Increases Utilitarian Moral Judgments. Nature 446, 908-911
61. Lichtenstein, Sarah, & Paul Slovic. 1971. Reversals of Preference between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions. J.Exp. Psychol. 89, 46-55
62. Mahlmann, Mathias, & John Mikhail 2005. Cognitive Science, Ethics, and Law. In Zenon Bankowski (ed.), Epistemology and Ontology. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 95-102
63. McGuire, Jonathan, Robyn Langdon, Max Goltheart, & C Mackenzie. 2009. A Reanalysis of the Personal/Impersonal Distinction in Moral Psychology Research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45, 577-580
64. Mikhail, John. 2002. Law, Science, and Morality: A Review of Richard Posner's 'The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory'. Stan. L. Rev. 54, 1057-1127
65. Mikhail, John. 2005. Moral Heuristics or Moral Competence? Reflections on Sunstein. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28, 557-558
66. Mikhail, John. 2007. Universal Moral Grammar: Theory, Evidence and the Future. Trends in Cognitive Science 11, 143-152
67. Mikhail, John. 2009. Is the Prohibition of Homicide Universal? Evidence from Comparative Criminal Law. Brooklyn L. Rev. 75, 497-515
68. Mikhail, John. 2011. Elements of Moral Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press
69. Mikhail, John. 2012. Moral Grammar and Human Rights: Some Reflections on Cognitive Science and Enlightenment Rationalism. In Ryan Goodman, Derek Jinks, & Andrew Woods (eds.), Understanding Social Action, Promoting Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press
70. Moore, Adam, Brian Clark, & Michael Kane. 2008. Who Shalt not Kill? Individual Difference is Working Memory Capacity, Executive Control, and Moral Judgment. Psychol. Sci. 18, 549-557
71. Nichols, Shaun, & Ron Mallon. 2006. Moral Dilemmas and Moral Rules. Cognition 100, 530-542
72. Oppenheimer, Daniel M. 2003. Not So Fast! (and Not so Frugal!): Rethinking the Recognition Heuristic. Cognition 90, B1-B9
73. Pinker, Steven. 1994. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York: Harper/Collins
74. Posner, Richard. 1997. The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory. Harv. L. Rev. 111, 1637-1717
75. Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press
76. Ritov, Ilana. 2005. Cognitive Heuristics and Deontological Rules. Brain & Behav. Sci. 28, 559-560
77. Robinson, Paul H., & John M. Darley. 1995. Justice, Liability and Blame: Community Views and the Criminal Law. Boulder: Westview Press
78. Robinson, Paul H., & John M. Darley. 1997. The Utility of Desert. Northwestern U.L.R. 91, 453-499
79. Robinson, Paul H., Robert Kurzban, & Owen Jones. 2007. Origins of Shared Intuitions of Justice. Vanderbilt L. Rev. 60, 1633-1688
80. Robinson, Paul, & Adil Ahmad Haque. 2011. Advantaging Aggressors: Justice and Deterrence in International Law. Harv. Nat'l. Security J. 3, 143-221
81. Royzmon, Edward B., & Jonathan Baron. 2002. The Preference for Indirect Harm. Social Justice Res. 15, 165-184
82. Shafir, Eldar. 1993. Choosing versus Rejecting: Why Some Options Are Both Better and Worse Than Others. Mem & Cogn. 39, 546-556
83. Simons, Kenneth. 2011. When is Negligent Inadvertence Culpable? Crim. Law & Phil. 5, 97-114
84. Singer, Peter. 2006. Morality, Reason, and the Rights of Animals. In Frans de Waal (ed.), Primates and Philosophers. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 140-158
85. Stanovich, Keith E., & Richard F. West 2002. Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate. In Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin, & Daniel Kahneman (eds.), Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 421-440
86. Sunstein, Cass. 2004a. Moral Heuristics and Moral Framing. Minn. L. Rev. 88, 1556-1597
87. Sunstein, Cass. 2004b. On the Psychology of Punishment. Supreme Court Econ. Rev.11, 171-188
88. Sunstein, Cass. 2005. Moral Heuristics. Behav. & Brain Sci. 28, 531-573
89. Thomson, Judith J. 1976. Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem. The Monist 59, 204-217
90. Tversky, Amos. 1972. Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice. Psychol. Rev. 79, 281-299
91. Tversky, Amos, & Daniel Kahneman. 1973. Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability. Cogn Psychol. 5, 207-233
92. Tversky, Amos, & Daniel Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science 185, 1124-1131
93. Tversky, Amos, & Itamar Simonson. 1993. Context-Dependent Preferences. Mgmt. Sci. 39, 1179-1189
94. Valdesolo, Piercarlo, & David DeSteno. 2006. Manipulation of Emotional Context Shapes Moral Judgment. Psychol. Sci. 17, 476-477
95. Weinberg, Jonathan, Shaun Nichols, & Stephen P. Stich 2008. Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions. In Joshua Knobe, & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Experimental Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 17-45
96. Wertheimer, Alan. 2003. Consent to Sexual Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
97. Wilkinson-Ryan, Tess, & Jonathan Baron. 2009. Moral Judgment and Moral Heuristics in Breach of Contract. J. Empirical Leg. Stud. 6, 405-424
98. Wood, Allen. 2011. Humanity as an End in Itself. In Derek Parfit (ed.), On What Matters. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 58-82