Estimating the Fertility Effect of Expansions of Publicly Funded Family Planning Services in California

Women's Health Issues

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 418-424

  Foster, Diana G ^a   Biggs, M Antonia ^a   Rostovtseva, Daria ^a   Thiel de Bocanegra, Heike ^a   Darney, Philip D ^a   Brindis, Claire D ^a  

^a UCSF Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ABORTION; ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH CONTROL; CONTRACEPTION; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL; HUMAN; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; PREGNANCY RATE; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; UNITED STATES; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY;

ABORTION, INDUCED; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIRTH RATE; CALIFORNIA; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HUMANS; MEDICAID; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POVERTY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, UNPLANNED; PROGRAM EVALUATION; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052471334     PISSN: 10493867     EISSN: 18784321     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bartz D., Shew M., Ofner S., Fortenberry J.D. Pregnancy intentions and contraceptive behaviors among adolescent women: A coital event level analysis. Journal of Adolescent Health 2007, 41(3):271-276.
2. Biggs M., Rostovtseva D., Brindis C. Findings from the 2007 Family PACT client exit interviews 2010, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
3. Family PACT program report, fiscal year 08/09 2010, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, Sacramento.
4. Brown S.S., Eisenberg L. The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families 1995, Institute of Medicine, Committee on Unintended Pregnancy, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
5. Edwards J., Bronstein J., Adams K. Evaluation of Medicaid Family planning demonstrations 2003, The CNA Corporation, Alexandria, VA.
6. Finer L.B., Henshaw S.K. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2006, 38:90-96.
7. Finer L.B., Frohwirth L.F., Dauphinee L.A., Singh S., Moore A.M. Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States. Contraception 2006, 74:334-344.
8. Foster D.G., Biggs M.A., Amaral G., Brindis C.D., Navarro S., Bradsberry M., et al. Estimates of pregnancies averted through California's family planning waiver program in 2002. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2006, 38:126-131.
9. Foster D.G., Higgins J.A., Biggs M.A., McCain C., Holtby S., Brindis C.D. Willingness to have unprotected sex. Journal of Sex Research 2011, 1-8.
10. Foster D.G., Klaisle C.M., Blum M., Bradsberry M.E., Brindis C.D., Stewart F.H. Expanded state-funded family planning services: Estimating pregnancies averted by the Family PACT Program in California, 1997-1998. American Journal of Public Health 2004, 94:1341-1346.
11. Frost J.J., Henshaw S.K., Sonfield A. Contraceptive needs and services, national and state data, 2008 update 2010, Guttmacher Institute, New York.
12. Gold R., Sonfield A., Richards C., Frost J. Next steps for America's family planning program: Leveraging the potential of Medicaid and Title X in an evolving health care system 2009, Guttmacher Institute, New York.
13. Goldhaber M.K., Fireman B.H. The fetal life table revisited: spontaneous abortion rates in three Kaiser Permanente cohorts. Epidemiology 1991, 2:33-39.
14. Contraceptive needs and services 2006, Guttmacher Institute, Author, New York.
15. State Medicaid family planning eligibility expansions 2011, Guttmacher Institute, Author, New York.
16. Hatcher R.A. Contraceptive technology 2007, Ardent Media, New York. 19th rev. ed.
17. Logan C., Holcombe E., Manlove J., Ryan S. The consequences of unintended childbearing. Child Trends Inc. and National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy 2007, Child Trends, Washington, DC.
18. National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association. (N.D.) Family planning facts: History of Title X. Available: Accessed October 9, 2009. http://www.nfprha.org.
19. Saraiya M., Berg C.J., Shulman H., Green C.A., Atrash H.K. Estimates of the annual number of clinically recognized pregnancies in the United States, 1981-1991. American Journal of Epidemiology 1999, 149:1025-1029.
20. Sonfield A., Alrich C., Gold R.B. State government innovation in the design and implementation of Medicaid family planning expansions 2008, Guttmacher Institute, New York.
21. Strauss L.T., Herndon J., Chang J., Parker W.Y., Bowens S.V., Berg C.J. Abortion surveillance-United States, 2002. MMWR Surveillance Summaries 2005, 54:1-31.
22. Tapales A., Finer L.B., Frost J.J. The impact of publicly funded family planning clinic services on unintended pregnancies and government cost savings. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 2008, 19:778-796.
23. Thiel de Bocanegra H., Rostovtseva D., Menz M., Karl J., Darney P. The 2007 Family PACT medical record review: Assessing the quality of services 2008, Bixby Center for Global Health University of California San Francisco, Sacramento.
24. Trussell J. Contraceptive efficacy contraceptive technology 2007, Ardent Media, New York. 19th ed.
25. Wu J., Meldrum S., Dozier A., Stanwood N., Fiscella K. Contraceptive nonuse among US women at risk for unplanned pregnancy. Contraception 2008, 78:284-289.