Visual analysis of set relations in a graph

Computer Graphics Forum

Volumn 32, Issue 3 PART1, 2013, Pages 61-70

  Xu, Panpan ^a   Du, Fan ^b   Cao, Nan ^c   Shi, Conglei ^a   Zhou, Hong ^d   Qu, Huamin ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^d SHENZHEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

WEBSITES;

CASE-STUDIES; COLLABORATION NETWORK; CONTOUR MAP; NOVEL VISUALIZATIONS; SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITES; SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS; VISUAL ANALYSIS; VISUALIZATION SYSTEM;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84879801327     PISSN: 01677055     EISSN: 14678659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.12093     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alper B., Riche N. H., Ramos G., Czerwinski M.,: Design study of LineSets, a novel set visualization technique. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (Dec 2011), 2259-67. 2, 4.
2. Bezerianos A., Chevalier F., Dragicevic P., Elmqvist N., Fekete J.-D.,: Graphdice: A system for exploring multivariate social networks. Computer Graphic Forum 29, 3 (2010), 863-872. 2.
3. Brandes U., Cornelsen S., Pampel B., Sallaberry A.,: Blocks of hypergraphs. In Combinatorial Algorithms, Iliopoulos C., Smyth W., (Eds.), vol. 6460 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 201-211. 2.
4. Brandes U., Cornelsen S., Pampel B., Sallaberry A.,: Path-based supports for hypergraphs. Journal of Discrete Algorithms 14 (2012), 248-261. 2.
5. Bertault F., Eades P.,: Drawing hypergraphs in the subset standard (short demo paper). In Graph Drawing, Marks J., (Ed.), vol. 1984 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001, pp. 164-169. 2. (Pubitemid 33243327)
6. Cantador I., Brusilovsky P., Kuflik T.,: 2nd workshop on information heterogeneity and fusion in recommender systems (hetrec 2011). In Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on Recommender systems (New York, NY, USA, 2011), RecSys 2011, ACM, pp. 387-388. 7.
7. Collins C., Penn G., Carpendale M. S. T.,: Bubble sets: Revealing set relations with isocontours over existing visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 15, 6 (2009), 1009-1016. 2, 4.
8. Cao N., Sun J., Lin Y.-R., Gotz D., Liu S., Qu H.,: Facetatlas: Multifaceted visualization for rich text corpora. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16, 6 (nov.dec. 2010), 1172-1181. 2, 4.
9. Dörk M., Riche N. H., Ramos G., Dumais S. T.,: Pivotpaths: Strolling through faceted information spaces. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 12 (2012), 2709-2718. 2.
10. Dinkla K., Van Kreveld M. J., Speckmann B., Westenberg M. A.,: Kelp diagrams: Point set membership visualization. Computer Graphics Forum 31, 3pt1 (2012), 875-884. 2, 4.
11. Fekete J.-D., Grinstein G., Plaisant C.,: Ieee infovis 2004 contest, the history of infovis. In http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/iv04contest (2004). 7.
12. Johnson D. S., Pollak H. O.,: Hypergraph planarity and the complexity of drawing venn diagrams. Journal of Graph Theory 11, 3 (1987), 309-325. 2.
13. Kaufmann M., Kreveld M., Speckmann B.,: Graph drawing. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, ch. Subdivision Drawings of Hypergraphs, pp. 396-407. 2.
14. Kairam S., MacLean D., Savva M., Heer J.,: Graphprism: compact visualization of network structure. In AVI (2012), pp. 498-505. 2.
15. Last.fm, Dec. 2012. 6.
16. Mäkinen E.,: How to draw a hypergraph. International Journal of Computer Mathematics 34, 3-4 (1990), 177-185. 2.
17. McCallum A. K.,: Mallet: A machine learning for language toolkit. http://mallet.cs.umass.edu, 2002. 7.
18. McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. M.,: Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27, 1 (2001), 415-444. 1, 3.
19. Perer A., Shneiderman B.,: Integrating statistics and visualization: case studies of gaining clarity during exploratory data analysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (2008), ACM, pp. 265-274. 2.
20. Riche N., Dwyer T.,: Untangling euler diagrams. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16, 6 (Nov 2010), 1090-1099. 2.
21. Shneiderman B., Aris A.,: Network visualization by semantic substrates. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, 5 (sept.oct. 2006), 733-740. 2. (Pubitemid 44955598)
22. Simonetto P., Auber D., Archambault D.,: Fully automatic visualisation of overlapping sets. Computer Graphics Forum 28, 3 (2009), 967-974. 2.
23. Stapleton G., Rodgers P., Howse J., Zhang L.,: Inductively generating euler diagrams. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 1 (2011), 88-100. 2.
24. Steinberger M., Waldner M., Streit M., Lex A., Schmalstieg D.,: Context-preserving visual links. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (2011), 2249-2258. 4.
25. Von Landesberger T., Kuijper A., Schreck T., Kohlhammer J., Van Wijk J., Fekete J.-D., Fellner D.,: Visual analysis of large graphs: State-of-the-art and future research challenges. Computer Graphics Forum 30, 6 (2011), 1719-1749. 2.
26. Ware C.,: Information Visualization: Perception for Design (Interactive Technologies), 1st ed. Morgan Kaufmann, Feb. 2000. 4.
27. Wattenberg M.,: Visual exploration of multivariate graphs. In CHI (2006), pp. 811-819. 2. (Pubitemid 44032170)
28. Wong P. C., Foote H., Chin G., Mackey P., Perrine K.,: Graph signatures for visual analytics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, 6 (2006), 1399-413. 2. (Pubitemid 44523085)
29. Zinsmaier M., Brandes U., Deussen O., Strobelt H.,: Interactive level-of-detail rendering of large graphs. IEEE Transaction on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 12 (2012), 2486-2495. 4.