Hydrologic system complexity and nonlinear dynamic concepts for a catchment classification framework

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 4119-4131

  Sivakumar, B ^a,b   Singh, V P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Texas A and M University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENT CLASSIFICATIONS; CLASSIFICATION FRAMEWORK; CORRELATION DIMENSIONS; DATA RECONSTRUCTION; HYDROLOGIC SYSTEMS; IDENTIFICATION OF SYSTEMS; NONLINEAR DYNAMIC METHODS; WESTERN UNITED STATES;

CATCHMENTS; RUNOFF; STREAM FLOW; TIME SERIES;

COMPLEX NETWORKS;

CATCHMENT; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLEXITY; DATA SET; FLOW MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; NONLINEARITY; STREAMFLOW; TIME SERIES;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84879731957     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-16-4119-2012     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Ali, G., Tetzlaff, D., Soulsby, C., McDonnell, J. J., and Capell, R.: A comparison of similarity indices for catchment classification using a cross-regional dataset, Adv. Water Resour., 40, 11-22, 2012
2. Beckinsale, R. P.: River regimes, edited by: Chorley, R. J., Water, Earth, and Man. Methuen, London, 455-471, 1969
3. Beven, K. J.: Uncertainty and the detection of structural change in models of environmental systems, edited by: Beck, M. B., Environmental Foresight and Models: A Manifesto, Elsevier, The Netherlands, 227-250, 2002
4. Chapman, T.: Classification of regions, edited by: Falkenmark, M. and Chapman, T., Comparative Hydrology: An Ecological Approach to Land and Water Resources, Paris, UNESCO, 67-74, 1989
5. Chow, V. T.: Handbook of Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 1964
6. Dooge, J. C. I.: The hydrologic cycle as a closed system, Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. Bull., 13, 58-68, 1967a
7. Dooge, J. C. I.: A new approach to nonlinear problems in surface water hydrology: hydrologic systems with uniform nonlinearity, Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. Publ., 76, 409-413, 1967b
8. Fraser, A. M. and Swinney, H. L.: Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information, Phys. Rev. A, 33, 1134-1140, 1986
9. Govindaraju, R. S.: Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: Hydrological applications, ASCE J. Hydrol. Eng., 5, 124-137, 2000
10. Grassberger, P. and Procaccia, I.: Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors, Physica D, 9, 189-208, 1983a
11. Grassberger, P. and Procaccia, I.: Estimation of the Kolmogorov entropy from a chaotic signal, Phys. Rev. A, 28, 2591-2593, 1983b
12. Grayson, R. B. and Blöschl, G.: Spatial Patterns in Catchment Hydrology: Observations and Modeling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000
13. Haines, A. T., Finlayson, B. L., and McMahon, T. A.: A global classification of river regimes, Appl. Geogr., 8, 255-272, 1988
14. Harris, N. M., Gurnell, A. M., Hannah, D. M., and Petts, G. E.: Classification of river regimes: a context for hydroecology, Hydrol. Process., 14, 2831-2848, 2000
15. Havstad, J.W. and Ehlers, C. L.: Attractor dimension of nonstationary dynamical systems from small data sets, Phys. Rev. A, 39, 845-853, 1989
16. Henon, M.: A two-dimensional mapping with a strange attractor, Commun. Math. Phys., 50, 69-77, 1963
17. Holzfuss, J. and Mayer-Kress, G.: An approach to error-estimation in the application of dimension algorithms, in: Dimensions and Entropies in Chaotic Systems, edited by: Mayer-Kress, G., Springer, New York, 114-122, 1986
18. Isik, S. and Singh, V. P.: Hydrologic regionalization of watersheds in Turkey, ASCE J. Hydrol. Eng., 13, 824-834, 2008
19. Izzard, C. F.: A mathematical model for nonlinear hydrologic systems, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 4811-4824, 1966
20. Kavvas, M. L.: Nonlinear hydrologic processes: conservation equations for determining their means and probability distributions, ASCE J. Hydrol. Eng., 8, 44-53, 2003
21. Kennel, M. B., Brown, R., and Abarbanel, H. D. I.: Determining embedding dimension for phase space reconstruction using a geometric method, Phys. Rev. A, 45, 3403-3411, 1992
22. Koutsoyiannis, D.: On the quest for chaotic attractors in hydrological processes, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 51, 1065-1091, 2006
23. Krasovskaia, I.: Quantification of the stability of river flow regimes, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 40, 587-598, 1995
24. Krasovskaia, I.: Entropy-based grouping of river flow regimes, J. Hydrol., 202, 173-191, 1997
25. Liebert, W. and Schuster, H. G.: Proper choice of the time delay for the analysis of chaotic time series, Phys. Lett. A, 141, 386-390, 1989
26. Lorenz, E. N.: Deterministic nonperiodic flow, J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 130-141, 1963
27. Lorenz, E. N.: Dimension of weather and climate attractors, Nature, 353, 241-244, 1991
28. McDonnell, J. J. andWoods, R. A.: On the need for catchment classification, J. Hydrol., 299, 2-3, 2004
29. Merz, B. and Blöschl, G.: Regionalization of catchment model parameters, J. Hydrol., 287, 95-123, 2004
30. Nerenberg, M. A. H. and Essex, C.: Correlation dimension and systematic geometric effects, Phys. Rev. A, 42, 7065-7074, 1990
31. Olden, J. D. and Poff, N. L.: Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes, River Res. Appl., 19, 101-121, 2003
32. Olden, J. D., Kennard, M. J., and Pusey, B. J.: A framework for hydrologic classification with a review of methodologies and applications in ecohydrology, Ecohydrology, 5, 503-518, doi:10.1002/eco.251, 2011
33. Osborne, A. R. and Provenzale, A.: Finite correlation dimension for stochastic systems with power-law spectra, Physica D, 35, 357-381, 1989
34. Packard, N. H., Crutchfield, J. P., Farmer, J. D., and Shaw, R. S.: Geometry from a time series, Phys. Rev. Lett., 45, 712-716, 1980
35. Paola, C., Foufoula-Georgiou, E., Dietrich, W. E., Hondzo, M., Mohrig, D., Parker, G., Power, M. E., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Voller, V., and Wilcock, P.: Toward a unified science of the Earth's surface: opportunities for synthesis among hydrology, geomorphology, geochemistry, and ecology, Water Resour. Res., 42, W03S10, doi:10.1029/2005WR004336, 2006
36. Poff, N. L., Olden, J. D., Pepin, D. M., and Bledsoe, B. P.: Placing global stream flow variability in geographic and geomorphic contexts, River Res. Appl., 22, 149-166, 2006
37. Regonda, S., Sivakumar, B., and Jain, A.: Temporal scaling in river flow: can it be chaotic?, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 49, 373-385, 2004
38. Rosgen, D. L.: A classification of natural rivers, Catena, 22, 169-199, 1994
39. Sangoyomi, T. B., Lall, U., and Abarbanel, H. D. I.: Nonlinear dynamics of the Great Salt Lake: dimension estimation, Water Resour. Res., 32, 149-159, 1996
40. Schertzer, D., Tchiguirinskaia, I., Lovejoy, S., Hubert, P., and Bendjoudi, H.: Which chaos in the rainfall-runoff process? A discus-sion on "Evidence of chaos in the rainfall-runoff process" by Sivakumar et al., Hydrolog. Sci. J., 47, 139-147, 2002
41. Schreiber, T. and Kantz, H.: Observing and predicting chaotic signals: is 2% noise too much?, in: Predictability of Complex Dynamical Systems, edited by: Kravtsov, Yu. A. and Kadtke, J. B., Springer Series in Synergetics, Springer, Berlin, 43-65, 1996
42. Singh, V. P.: Hydrologic Systems: Volume 1, Rainfall-Runoff Modeling, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 1988
43. Sivakumar, B.: Chaos theory in hydrology: important issues and interpretations, J. Hydrol., 227, 1-20, 2000
44. Sivakumar, B.: Forecasting monthly streamflow dynamics in the western United States: a nonlinear dynamical approach, Environ. Modell. Softw., 18, 721-728, 2003
45. Sivakumar, B.: Dominant processes concept in hydrology: moving forward, Hydrol. Process., 18, 2349-2353, 2004a
46. Sivakumar, B.: Chaos theory in geophysics: past, present and future, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 19, 441-462, 2004b
47. Sivakumar, B.: Correlation dimension estimation of hydrologic series and data size requirement: myth and reality, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 50, 591-604, 2005a
48. Sivakumar, B.: Hydrologic modeling and forecasting: role of thresholds, Environ. Modell. Softw., 20, 515-519, 2005b
49. Sivakumar, B.: Dominant processes concept, model simplification and classification framework in catchment hydrology, Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 22, 737-748, 2008
50. Sivakumar, B., Liong, S. Y., Liaw, C. Y., and Phoon, K. K.: Singapore rainfall behavior: chaotic?, ASCE J. Hydrol. Eng. 4, 38-48, 1999a
51. Sivakumar, B., Phoon, K. K., Liong, S. Y., and Liaw, C. Y.: A systematic approach to noise reduction in chaotic hydrological time series, J. Hydrol., 219, 103-135, 1999b
52. Sivakumar, B., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, H. V., and Gao, X.: A chaotic approach to rainfall disaggregation, Water Resour. Res., 37, 61-72, 2001
53. Sivakumar, B., Berndtsson, R., Olsson, J., and Jinno, K.: Reply to "Which chaos in the rainfall-runoff process?" by Schertzer et al., Hydrolog. Sci. J., 47, 149-158, 2002a
54. Sivakumar, B., Persson, M., Berndtsson, R., and Uvo, C. B.: Is correlation dimension a reliable indicator of low-dimensional chaos in short hydrological time series?, Water Resour. Res., 38, 1011, doi:10.1029/ 2001WR000333, 2002b
55. Sivakumar, B., Wallender, W. W., Horwath, W. R., Mitchell, J. P., Prentice, S. E., and Joyce, B. A.: Nonlinear analysis of rainfall dynamics in California's Sacramento Valley, Hydrol. Process., 20, 1723-1736, 2006
56. Sivakumar, B., Jayawardena, A.W., and Li,W. K.: Hydrologic complexity and classification: a simple data reconstruction approach, Hydrol. Process., 21, 2713-2728, 2007
57. Snelder, T. H., Biggs, B. J. F., and Woods, R. A.: Improved ecohydrological classification of rivers, River Res. Appl., 21, 609-628, 2005
58. Takens, F.: Detecting strange attractors in turbulence, in: Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, edited by: Rand, D. A. and Young, L. S., Lecture Notes in Mathematics 898, Springer-Verlag, 366-381, 1981
59. Tootle, G. A. and Piechota, T. C.: Relationships between Pacific and Atlantic ocean sea surface temperatures and U.S. streamflow variability, Water Resour. Res., 42, W07411, doi:10.1029/2005WR004184, 2006
60. Tsonis, A. A., Triantafyllou, G. N., Elsner, J. B., Holdzkom II, J. J., and Kirwan Jr., A. D.: An investigation on the ability of nonlinear methods to infer dynamics from observables, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 75, 1623-1633, 1994
61. Vormoor, K., Skaugen, T., Langsholt, E., Diekkrüger, B., and Skøien, J. O.: Geostatistical regionalization of daily runoff forecasts in Norway, Int. J. River Basin Management, 9, 3-15, 2011
62. Wagener, T., Sivapalan, M., Troch, P., andWoods, R. A.: Catchment classification and hydrologic similarity, Geog. Compass, 1, 901-931, 2007
63. Wardrop, D. H., Bishop, J. A., Easterling, M., Hychka, K., Myers, W. L., Patil, G. P., and Taille, C.: Use of landscape and land use parameters for classification of watersheds in the mid-Atlantic across five physiographic provinces, Environ. Ecol. Stat., 12, 209-223, 2005
64. Woods, R. A.: Seeing catchments with new eyes, Hydrol. Process., 16, 1111-1113, 2002
65. Young, P. C. and Beven, K. J.: Data-based mechanistic modeling and rainfall-flow non-linearity, Environmetrics, 5, 335-363, 1994