Cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free vaginal tape vs burch colposuspension for female stress urinary incontinence in the USA

BJU International

Volumn 112, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Laudano, Melissa A ^a   Seklehner, Stephan ^a,b   Chughtai, Bilal ^a   Lee, Una ^c   Tyagi, Renuka ^a   Kavaler, Elizabeth ^a   Te, Alexis E ^a   Kaplan, Steven A ^a   Lee, Richard K ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b Landesklinikum Baden Mödling ^*  (Austria)

^c VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Markov chains; stress urinary incontinence; suburethral slings

Indexed keywords

ABSCESS; ARTICLE; BLADDER PERFORATION; COLPOSUSPENSION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FOLLOW UP; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; INCISIONAL HERNIA; MEDICAL FEE; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRESS INCONTINENCE; TENSION FREE VAGINAL TAPE; UNITED STATES; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE RETENTION;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MARKOV CHAINS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBURETHRAL SLINGS; UNITED STATES; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84879692486     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12180     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S,. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trondelag. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 1150-1157
2. Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM, Yalcin I, Wagner TH, Buesching DP,. Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: further development of the incontinence quality of life instrument (I-QOL). Urology 1999; 53: 71-76
3. Wagner TH, Hu TW,. Economic costs of urinary incontinence in 1995. Urology 1998; 51: 355-361
4. Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 2143-2155
5. Thom DH, Nygaard IE, Calhoun EA,. Urologic diseases in America project: urinary incontinence in women-national trends in hospitalizations, office visits, treatment and economic impact. J Urol 2005; 173: 1295-1301
6. Liapis A, Bakas P, Creatsas G,. Burch colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in the management of stress urinary incontinence in women. Eur Urol 2002; 41: 469-473
7. Persson J, Teleman P, Eten-Bergquist C, Wolner-Hanssen P,. Cost-analyzes based on a prospective, randomized study comparing laparoscopic colposuspension with a tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81: 1066-1073
8. Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Karram MM, Barber MD,. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 1249-1258
9. Valpas A, Kivela A, Penttinen J, Kujansuu E, Haarala M, Nilsson CG,. Tension-free vaginal tape and laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 42-49
10. Ward KL, Hilton P,. A prospective multicenter randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: two-year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 324-331
11. Bai SW, Sohn WH, Chung DJ, Park JH, Kim SK,. Comparison of the efficacy of Burch colposuspension, pubovaginal sling, and tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 91: 246-251
12. Foote AJ, Maughan V, Carne C,. Laparoscopic colposuspension versus vaginal suburethral slingplasty: a randomised prospective trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 46: 517-520
13. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G,. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1996; 7: 81-85; discussion 85-6
14. Wasserman Y,. Physician's Fee Reference, 23rd edn. Milwaukee: Medial Publishing, Ltd, 2006
15. Manca A, Sculpher MJ, Ward K, Hilton P,. A cost-utility analysis of tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence. BJOG 2003; 110: 255-262
16. Ankardal M, Jarbrink K, Milsom I, Heiwall B, Lausten-Thomsen N, Ellstrom-Engh M,. Comparison of health care costs for open Burch colposuspension, laparoscopic colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in the treatment of female urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2007; 26: 761-766
17. Cody J, Wyness L, Wallace S, et al. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of urinary stress incontinence. Health Technol Assess 2003; 7: iii, 1-189
18. Wu JM, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Myers ER,. Is Burch colposuspension ever cost-effective compared with tension-free vaginal tape for stress incontinence? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 62 e1-625
19. Brubaker L, Richter HE, Norton PA, et al. 5-year continence rates, satisfaction and adverse events of burch urethropexy and fascial sling surgery for urinary incontinence. J Urol 2012; 187: 1324-1330
20. Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Karram MM, Walters MD, Paraiso MF,. Randomised trial of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: long-term follow up. BJOG 2008; 115: 219-225; discussion 225
21. Ward KL, Hilton P,. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG 2008; 115: 226-233
22. Rodriguez LV, Raz S,. Prospective analysis of patients treated with a distal urethral polypropylene sling for symptoms of stress urinary incontinence: surgical outcome and satisfaction determined by patient driven questionnaires. J Urol 2003; 170: 857-863; discussion 863
23. Rogo-Gupta L, Baxter ZC, Le NB, Raz S, Rodriguez LV,. Long-term durability of the distal urethral polypropylene sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: minimum 11-year followup. J Urol 2012; 188: 1822-1827
24. Anger JT, Weinberg AE, Albo ME, et al. Trends in surgical management of stress urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries. Urology 2009; 74: 283-287