Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: Further development of the incontinence quality of life instrument (I-QOL)

Urology

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 71-76

  Patrick, D L ^a   Martin, M L ^b   Bushnell, D M ^b   Yalcin, I ^c   Wagner, T H ^d   Buesching, D P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Health Research Associates Inc   (United States)

^c ELI LILLY AND COMPANY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DULOXETINE; PLACEBO; SEROTONIN UPTAKE INHIBITOR;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFICACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCONTINENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 0032929493     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00454-3     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Consensus Statement from the First International Conference for the Prevention of Incontinence, Yokohama, Japan, September, 1997.
2. Shumaker S.A., Wyman J.F., Uebersax J.S., et al. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory . Qual Life Res. 3:1994;291-306.
3. Jackson S., Donovan J., Brookes S., et al. The Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire development and psychometric testing. Br J Urol. 77:1996;805-812.
4. Black N., Griffiths J., Pope C. Development of a symptom severity index and a symptom impact index for stress incontinence in women. Neurol Urodynam. 15:1996;630-640.
5. Yu L.C. Incontinence stress index measuring psychological impact . J Gerontol Nurs. 13:1987;18-25.
6. Cella D: Functional Assessment of Incontinence Therapy, version 2. Chicago, Rush Division of Psychosocial Oncology, 1994.
7. Hunskaar S., Vinsnes V. The quality of life in women with urinary incontinence as measured by the sickness impact profile. J Am Geriatr Soc. 40:1991;976-977.
8. Hunter D.J.W., McKee M., Black N.A., et al. Health status and quality of life of British men with lower urinary tract symptoms results from the SF-36 . Urology. 45:1995;962-971.
9. Renck-Hooper U., McKenna S.P., Whalley D. Measuring quality of life in female urinary urge incontinence development and psychometric properties of the IQOLI . Outcomes Res. 1:1997;1-8.
10. Wagner T.H., Patrick D.L., Bavendam T.G., et al. Quality of life in persons with urinary incontinence development of a new measure . Urology. 47:1996;67-72.
11. Patrick D.L., Erickson P. Health Status and Health Policy Allocating Resources to Health Care . 1993;Oxford University Press, New York.
12. Hunt S.M., McKenna S.P. The QLDS a scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression . Health Policy. 11:1992;307-319.
13. Burgio K.L., Matthews K.A., Engel B.T. Prevalence, incidence and correlates of urinary incontinence in healthy, middle-aged women. J Urol. 146:1991;1255-1259.
14. Harrison G.L., Memel D.S. Urinary incontinence in women its prevalence and its management in a health promotion clinic . Br J Gen Pract. 44:1994;149-512.
15. Ware J.E., Sherbourne D.C. The MOS 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) 1 Conceptual framework and item selection . Med Care. 30:1992;473-483.
16. Dupuy H.J. The psychosocial general well-being (PGWB) index. Wenger N.K., Mattson M.E., Furberg C.D., et al. Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies. 1984;170-183 LeJacq, New York.
17. Kadar N. The value of bladder filling in the clinical detection of urine loss and selection of patients for urodynamic testing. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 95:1988;698-704.
18. Juniper E.F., Guyatt G.H., Willan A., et al. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol. 47:1994;81-87.
19. Guyatt G.H., Feeny D.H., Patrick D.L. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 118:1993;622-629.
20. Scientific Advisory Committee Instrument Review Criteria, Medical Outcomes Trust (MOT), Boston, Massachusetts, March 1997.
21. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric Theory, vol. 2. 1994;532-533 Basic Books, New York.
22. Cronbach L.F. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometricka. 16:1951;297-334.
23. Deyo R.A., Diehr P., Patrick D.L. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Control Clin Trials. 12:1991;142s-158s.
24. Aday L.A. Designing and Conducting Health Surveys A Comprehensive Guide . 1991;41-50 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
25. Guyatt G., Walter S., Norman G. Measuring change over time assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments . J Chronic Dis. 40:1987;171-178.
26. Deyo R.A., Centor R.M. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change an analogy to diagnostic test performance . J Chronic Dis. 39:1986;897-906.
27. Katz J.N., Larson M.G., Phillips C.B., et al. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care. 30:1992;917-925.
28. Bo K., Maehlum S., Oseid S., et al. Prevalence of stress urinary incontinence among physically active and sedentary female students. Scand J Sports Sci. 11:1989;113-116.