Validity and reliability of a self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q)

Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 298-320

  Niki, Hisateru ^a   Tatsunami, Shinobu ^a   Haraguchi, Naoki ^b   Aoki, Takafumi ^c   Okuda, Ryuzo ^d   Suda, Yasunori ^e   Takao, Masato ^f   Tanaka, Yasuhito ^g  

^a ST MARIANNA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b TOKYO METROPOLITAN POLICE HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c NIPPON MEDICAL SCHOOL MUSASHI KOSUGI HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^d OSAKA MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

^e KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^f TEIKYO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^g NARA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANKLE INJURY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOOT DISEASE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF ADMINISTERED FOOT EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL STATUS; SPORT; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDATION PROCESS; VALIDITY; WELLBEING;

EID: 84879684696     PISSN: 09492658     EISSN: 14362023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00776-012-0337-2     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Niki H, Tatsunami S, Haraguchi N, Aoki T, Okuda R, Suda Y, Takao M, Tanaka Y. Development of the patient-based outcome instrument for the foot and ankle. Part 1: project description and evaluation of the outcome instrument version 1. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16:536-55.
2. Niki H, Tatsunami S, Haraguchi N, Aoki T, Okuda R, Suda Y, Takao M, Tanaka Y. Development of the patient-based outcome instrument for the foot and ankle. Part 2: results from the second field survey: validity of the outcome instrument for the foot and ankle version 2. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16:556-64.
3. Fukuhara S, Suzukamo Y. Manual of SF-36v2 (Japanese version). Kyoto: Institute for Health Outcomes and Process Evaluation Research; 2004.
4. Niki H, Aoki H, Inokuchi S, Ozeki S, Kinoshita M, Kura H, Tanaka Y, Noguchi M, Nomura S, Hatori M, Tatsunami S. Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders I: development of standard rating system. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10:457-65.
5. Niki H, Aoki H, Inokuchi S, Ozeki S, Kinoshita M, Kura H, Tanaka Y, Noguchi M, Nomura S, Hatori M, Tatsunami S. Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders II: interclinician and intraclinician reliability and validity of the newly established standard rating scales and Japanese Orthopaedic Association rating scale. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10:466-74.
6. Park HM. Evaluating interrater agreement with intraclass correlation coefficient in SPICE-based software process assessment. In: IEEE, editor. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Quality Software. Washington, DC: IEEE; 2003. p. 308-14.
7. Johanson NA, Liang MH, Daltroy L, Rudicel S, Richmond J. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004;86:902-9.
8. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM. Evidence of validity for the foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:968-83.
9. Bennett PJ, Patterson C, Wearing S, Baglioni T. Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1998;88:419-28.
10. Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The foot function index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:561-70.
11. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:349-53.
12. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:474-83.
13. Group EuroQol. EuroQol; a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199-208.
14. Dawson J, Boller I, Doll H, Lavis G, Sharp R, Cooke P, Jenkinson C. Responsiveness of the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS, SF-36 and EQ-5D assessments following foot or ankle surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2012;94:215-21.
15. Garrow AP, Papageorgiou AC, Silman AJ, Thomas E, Jayson MI, Macfarlane GJ. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess disabling foot pain. Pain. 2000;85:107-13.
16. Dawson J, Coffey J, Doll H, Lavis G, Cooke P, Herron M, Jenkinson C. A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery: validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:1211-22.
17. Dawson J, Doll H, Coffey J, Jenkinson C. Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments following surgery for hallux valgus. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2007;15:918-31.
18. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ. A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37:72-84.
19. Seligson D, Gassman J, Pope M. Ankle instability: evaluation of the lateral ligaments. Am J Sports Med. 1980;8:39-42.
20. Williams GN, Molloy JM, DeBerardino TM, Arciero RA, Taylor DC. Evaluation of the sports ankle rating system in young, athletic, individuals with acute lateral ankle sprains. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:274-82.
21. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Lalonde KA, Conti S. Current concept review: foot and ankle outcome instruments. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:383-90.