Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders II: Interclinician and intraclinician reliability and validity of the newly established standard rating scales and Japanese Orthopaedic Association rating scale

Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 466-474

  Niki, Hisateru ^a   Aoki, Haruhito ^a   Inokuchi, Suguru ^b   Ozeki, Satoru ^c   Kinoshita, Mitsuo ^d   Kura, Hideji ^e   Tanaka, Yasuhito ^f   Noguchi, Masahiko ^g   Nomura, Shigeharu ^h   Hatori, Masahito ⁱ   Tatsunami, Shinobu ^a  

^a ST MARIANNA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c DOKKYO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d OSAKA MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

^e SAPPORO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^f NARA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^g TOKYO WOMEN'S MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^h Nomura Seikeigeka Ganka Clinic   (Japan)

ⁱ TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANKLE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FOOT DISEASE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; JAPANESE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATION RATING SCALE; JAPANESE SOCIETY OF SURGERY OF THE FOOT RATING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 26244431740     PISSN: 09492658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00776-005-0937-1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ML Sidor JD Zuckerman T Lyon K Koval F Cuomo N Schoenberg 1993 The Neer classification system for proximal humeral fractures; an assessment of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility J Bone Joint Surg Am 75 1745 50
2. KA Siebenrock C Gerber 1993 The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus J Bone Joint Surg Am 75 1751 5
3. K Rome F Cowieson 1996 A reliability study of the universal goniometer, fluid goniometer, and electrogoniometer for the measurement of ankle dorsiflexion Foot Ankle Int 17 28 32
4. RJ Cummings EA Loveless J Campbell S Samelson JM Mazur 1998 Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the system of King et al. for the classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis J Bone Joint Surg Am 80 1107 11
5. JJ Irrgang L Snyder-Mackler RS Wainner FH Fu CD Harner 1998 Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee J Bone Joint Surg Am 80 1132 45
6. LG Lenke RR Bets KH Bridwell DH Clements J Harms TG Lowe 1998 Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis J Bone Joint Surg Am 80 1097 106
7. K Yonenobu K Abumi K Nagata E Taketomi K Ueyama 2001 Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system for evaluation of cervical myelopathy Rinsyou Seikeigeka (Clinical Orthopaedic Surgery) 36 423 8 (in Japanese)
8. MLVH Greenfield JE Kuhn EM Wojtys 1998 A statistic primer; validity and reliability Am J Sports Med 26 483 5
9. Japanese Orthopaedic Association 1991 Assessment criteria for foot disorders of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association J Jpn Orthop Assoc 65 680 (in Japanese)
10. N Hisateru A Nango 1995 Clinical rating systems for ankle disorders K Murota Y Yabe S Sano Manual of orthopaedic clinical rating systems Zen Nihonbyoin Shuppan Kai Tokyo 117 35 (in Japanese)
11. HB Kitaoka IJ Alexander RS Adelaar JA Nunley MS Myerson M Sanders 1994 Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes Foot Ankle Int 15 349 53
12. S Fukuhara Y Suzugamo 2004 Manual of SF-36v2 Japanese version Institute for Health Outcomes & Process Evaluation Research Kyoto (in Japanese)
13. BC Toolan VJ Wright Quinones BJ Cunningham ME Brage 2001 An evaluation of the use of retrospectively acquired preoperative AOFAS clinical rating scores to assess surgical outcome after elective foot and ankle surgery Foot Ankle Int 22 775 8
14. DB Thordarson SA Rudicel E Ebramzadeh LH Gill 2001 Outcome study of hallux valgus surgery: an AOFAS multi-center study Foot Ankle Int 22 956 9 Erratum in: Foot Ankle Int 2002;23:96
15. FG Hunsaker DA Cioffi PC Amadio JT Wright B Caughlin 2002 The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population J Bone Joint Surg Am 84 208 15
16. NF SooHoo M Shuler LL Fleming 2003 Evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS clinical rating systems by correlation to the SF-36 Foot Ankle Int 24 50 5
17. NA Johanson MH Liang L Daltroy S Rudicel J Richmond 2004 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 902 9
18. D Thordarson E Ebramzadeh M Moorthy J Lee S Rudicel 2005 Correlation of hallux valgus surgical outcome with AOFAS forefoot score and radiological parameters Foot Ankle Int 26 122 7