Acquisition, extinction, recovery, and reversal of different response sequences under conditional control by nicotine in rats

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 140, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 187-203

  Troisi, Joseph R ^a  

^a SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

drug discrimination; drug seeking behavior; extinction; heterogeneous chain; nicotine; rats; relapse

Indexed keywords

NICOTINE;

ANIMAL; DRUG EFFECTS; DRUG SEEKING BEHAVIOR; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; LEARNING; MALE; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DRUG-SEEKING BEHAVIOR; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; NICOTINE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REVERSAL LEARNING;

EID: 84879653953     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: 19400888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221309.2013.785929     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beardsley, P. M., Anthony, E. W., & Lopez, O. T. (1992). Phencyclidine established as a discriminative stimulus using ethanol as a reinforcer. Behavioural Pharmacology, 3, 497-505. doi: 10.1097/00008877- 199210000-00008
2. Bevins, R. A., &Murray, J. E. (2011). Internal stimuli generated by abused substances: role of Pavlovian conditioning and its implications for drug addiction. In T. R. Schachtman & S. Reilly (Eds.), Associative learning and conditioning: Human and non-human applications (pp. 270-289). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3. Bouton, M. E., Kenney, F. A., & Rosengard, C. (1990). State-dependent fear extinction with two benzodiazepine tranquilizers. Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 44-55. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.104.1.44 (Pubitemid 20138261)
4. Colpaert, F. C., & Koek, W. (1995). Empirical evidence that the state dependence and drug discrimination paradigms can generate different outcomes. Psychopharmacology, 120(3), 272-279. doi: 10.1007/BF02311174.
5. Colpaert, F. C., Niemegeers, C. J. E., & Janssen, P. A. J. (1978). Drug-cue conditioning to external stimulus conditions. European Journal of Pharmacology, 49, 185-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(78)90076-6 (Pubitemid 9200998)
6. Conklin, C. A., & Tiffany, S. T. (2002) Applying extinction research and theory to cue-exposure addiction treatments. Addiction, 97, 155-167. doi: 10.1046/j.1360- 0443.2002.00014.x (Pubitemid 34112374)
7. D'Andrea, T. (1969). Extinction of a heterogeneous chain after several reinforcement schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 127-135.
8. Duncan, P. M., Phillips, J., Reints, J., & Schechter, M. D. (1979). Interaction between discrimination of drug states and external stimuli. Psychopharmacology, 61, 105-106. doi: 10.1007/BF00426820 (Pubitemid 9250923)
9. Everitt, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2000). Second-order schedules of drug reinforcement in rats and monkeys: Measurement of reinforcing efficacy and drug-seeking behaviour. Psychopharmacology, 153(1), 17-30. doi:10.1007/ s002130000566 (Pubitemid 32127901)
10. Jarbe, T. U., & Johansson, B. (1984). Interaction between drug discriminative stimuli and exteroceptive, sensory signals. Behavioral Neuroscience, 98(4), 686-694. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.98.4.686 (Pubitemid 14037794)
11. Jarbe T. U. C., Sterner, U., & Hjerpe, C. (1981). Conditioning of an interoceptive drug stimulus to different exteroceptive contexts. Psychopharmacology, 73, 23-26. doi: 10.1007/BF00431094 (Pubitemid 11149347)
12. Kelleher, R. T., & Gollub, L. R. (1962). A review of positive conditioned reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 543-597. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5- s543
13. Lattal, K. A., & Crawford-Godbey, C. L. (1985). Homogeneous chains, heterogeneous chains, and delay of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 337-342. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-337
14. Lu, B., Li,M., Hou, Y-y., Chen, J., Chi, Z-q., & Liu, J-g. (2010). Initial experience of heroin use under a two-chained operant schedule influences drug-seeking behavior one month of abstinence. Acta Pharmacologia Sinica, 31, 387-392. doi: 10.1038/aps.2010.16
15. Palmatier, M. I., Liu, X., Matteson, G. L., Donny, E. C., Caggiula, A. R., & Sved, A. F. (2007). Conditioned reinforcement in rats established with self-administered nicotine and enhanced by noncontingent nicotine. Psychopharmacology, 195, 235-243. doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-0897-6 (Pubitemid 350045848)
16. Panlilio, L.V., Thorndike, E. B., & Schindler, C. W. (2008). A stimulus-control account of regulated drug intake in rats. Psychopharmacology, 196, 441-450. doi: 10.1007/s00213- 007-0978-6 (Pubitemid 351191178)
17. Parker, B. K., Schaal, D. W., & Miller, M. (1994). Drug discrimination using a Pavlovian conditional discrimination paradigm in pigeons. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 49, 955-960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ 0091-3057(94)90249-6 (Pubitemid 24376036)
18. Pelloux, Y., Everitt, B. J., & Dickinson, A. (2007). Compulsive drug seeking by rats under punishment: Effects of drug taking history. Psychopharmacology, 194, 127-137. doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-0805-0 (Pubitemid 47282729)
19. Pierrel, R., & Sherman, J. G. (1963). Barnabus, the rat with college training. Brown Alumini Monthly, February, 8-14.
20. Rijnders, H. J., Jarbe, T. U. C., & Slangen, J. L. (1991). Reversal of a drug versus drug discrimination task with different exteroceptive conditions. Behavioral Pharmacology, 2, 429-435. doi:10.1097/00008877-199109000- 00018
21. Semenova, S., Stolerman, I. P., & Markou, A. (2007). Chronic nicotine administration improves attention while nicotine withdrawal induces performance deficits in the 5- choice serial reaction time task in rats. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 87, 360-368. doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2007.05.009 (Pubitemid 47101880)
22. Schindler, C. W., Panlilio, L. V., & Goldberg, S. R. (2002). Second-order schedules of drug self-administration in animals. Psychopharmacology, 163, 327-344. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1157-4
23. Siegel, S. (2005). Drug tolerance, drug addiction, and drug self-administration. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 296-300. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00384.x (Pubitemid 44211040)
24. Stolerman, I. P., Garcha, H. S., Pratt, J. A., & Kumar, R. R. (1984). Role of training dose in discrimination of nicotine and related compounds by rats. Psychopharmacology, 84, 413-419. doi: 10.1007/BF00555223 (Pubitemid 15205971)
25. Troisi, J. R., II. (2003a). Nicotine vs. ethanol discrimination: Extinction and spontaneous recovery of responding. Integrative Physiological&Behavioral Science, 38(2), 104-123. doi:10.1007/BF02688829
26. Troisi, J. R., II. (2003b). Spontaneous recovery during, but not following, extinction of the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats: Reinstatement of stimulus control. The Psychological Record, 53, 579-592.
27. Troisi, J. R., II. (2006). Pavlovian-instrumental transfer of the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and ethanol in rats. The Psychological Record, 56(4), 499-512.
28. Troisi, J. R., II. (2011). Pavlovian extinction of the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and ethanol in rats varies as a function of context. The Psychological Record, 61(2), 199-212.
29. Troisi, J. R., II. (in press). Perhaps more consideration of Pavlovian-operant Interaction may improve the clinical efficacy of behaviorally based drug treatment programs. The Psychological Record.
30. Troisi, J. R., II, & Akins, C. (2004). The discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in a pavlovian sexual approach paradigm in male Japanese quail. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12(4), 237.
31. Troisi, J. R., II, Bryant, E., & Kane, J. (2012). Extinction of the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine with a devalued reinforcer: Recovery following revaluation. The Psychological Record, 62(4), 707-718.
32. Troisi, J. R., LeMay, B. J., & Jarbe, T. U. (2010). Transfer of the discriminative stimulus effects of - 9-THC and nicotine from one operant response to another in rats. Psychopharmacology, 212(2), 171-179 Research Excellence