PEER performance-based earthquake engineering methodology, revisited

Journal of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 829-858

  Günay, Selim ^a   Mosalam, Khalid M ^a  

^a 109 McLaughlin Hall   (United States)

Author keywords

Damage Analysis; Hazard Analysis; Loss Analysis; PEER Methodology; Performance Based Design; Structural Analysis; Total Probability; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

DAMAGE ANALYSIS; HAZARD ANALYSIS; LOSS ANALYSIS; PEER METHODOLOGY; PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN; TOTAL PROBABILITIES; UNCERTAINTY;

CIVIL ENGINEERING; EARTHQUAKES; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84879612074     PISSN: 13632469     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2013.787377     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) [2000] Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Report No. FEMA-356, Washington, D.C.
2. Applied Technology Council (ATC) [1996] Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Report No. ATC-40, Volume 1-2, Redwood City, California.
3. Applied Technology Council (ATC) [2013] "Development of next generation performance-based seismic design procedures for new and existing buildings." Retrieved from https://www.atcouncil.org/Projects/atc-58- project.html.
4. Beck, J. L., Porter, K. A., Shaikhutdinov, R., Moroi, T., Tsukada, Y., and Masuda, M. [2002] Impact of Seismic Risk on Lifetime Property Values, Final Report, CUREE-Kajima Joint Research Program Phase IV Consortium of Universities for Earthquake Engineering Research, Richmond, California.
5. Bohl, A. [2009] "Comparison of performance based engineering approaches," Master thesis, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
6. Bommer, J. J. and Abrahamson, N. A. [2006] "Why do modern probabilistic seismic-hazard analyses often lead to increase hazard estimates?," Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 96(6), 1967-1977.
7. Building Seismic Safety Council [1997] NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Report No. FEMA-273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
8. Chaudhuri, S. M. and Hutchinson, T. C. [2005] Performance Characterization of Bench-and Shelf-Mounted Equipment, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER, Report No. PEER 2005/05.
9. Comerio, M. C., Ed. [2005] PEER Testbed Study on a Laboratory Building: Exercising Seismic Performance Assessment, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER, Report No.PEER 2005/12.
10. Cornell, C. A. and Krawinkler, H. [2000] "Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment," PEER News, April.
11. Field, E. H., Jordan, T. H., and Cornell, C. A. [2003] "OpenSHA: A developing community-modeling environment for seismic hazard analysis," Seismological Research Letters 74(4), 406-419. (Pubitemid 37002019)
12. Frankel, A. and Leyendecker, E. V. [2001] Uniform Hazard Response Spectra and Seismic Hazard Curves for the United States, US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California.
13. Goulet, C., Haselton, C. B.,Mitrani-Reiser, J., Deierlein, G. G., Stewart, J. P., and Taciroglu, E. [2006] "Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building-part I: ground motion selection and structural collapse simulation," 8th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering (100th Anniversary Earthquake Conference), San Francisco, CA, April 18-22.
14. Günay, M. S. and Mosalam, K. M. [2010] Structural Engineering Reconnaissance of the April 6, 2009, Abruzzo, Italy, Earthquake, and Lessons Learned, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER, Report No. 2010/105.
15. Hashemi, A. and Mosalam, K. M. [2006] "Shake-table experiment on reinforced concrete structure containing masonry infill wall," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 35(14), 1827-1852. (Pubitemid 44696677)
16. Hwang, H. H. M. and Jaw, J.-W. [1990] "Probabilistic damage analysis of structures," Journal of Earthquake Engineering 116(7), 1992-2007.
17. Holmes, W. [2010] "Reconnaissance report on hospitals," (oral presentation), Chile EERI/PEER Reconnaissance Briefing at UC Berkeley, March 30, Berkeley, California.
18. Insight Software Solutions [2013] MacroExpress. Retrieved from http://www.macros.com.
19. International Code Council [2000] International Building Code 2000, International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, California, pp. 756.
20. Kramer, S. [1996] Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
21. Krawinkler, H. [2002] "A general approach to seismic performance assessment," Proceedings of International Conference on Advances and New Challenges in Earthquake Engineering Research, ICANCEER, Hong Kong, August 19-20.
22. Krawinkler, H. and Miranda, E. [2004] "Performance-based Earthquake Engineering," in Earthquake Engineering: from Engineering Seismology to Performance-based Engineering, eds. Y. Bozorgnia and V. V. Bertero (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), Ch. 9.
23. Krawinkler, H., Ed. [2005] Van Nuys Hotel Building Testbed Report: Exercising Seismic Performance Assessment, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER, Report No. PEER 2005/11.
24. Kunnath, S. K. [2006] Application of the PEER PBEE Methodology to the I-880 Viaduct, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER, Report No. 2006/10.
25. Kunnath, S. K., Larson, L., and Miranda, E. [2006]. "Modeling considerations in probabilistic performance-based seismic evaluation: case study of the I-880 viaduct," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamic 35(1), 57-75. (Pubitemid 43020069)
26. Lee, T.-H. and Mosalam, K. M. [2006] Probabilistic Seismic Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structural Components and Systems, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER, Report No. 2006/04.
27. MathWorks Inc. [2010] MATLAB-Version 2010b.
28. McKenna, F. [2010] Opensees User's Manual. Retrieved from http://opensees.berkeley.edu.
29. Mitrani-Reiser, J., Haselton, C. B., Goulet, C., Porter, K. A., Beck, J., and Deierlein, G. G. [2006] "Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building-part II: loss estimation," 8th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering (100th Anniversary Earthquake Conference), San Francisco, California, April 18-22.
30. Moehle, J. P. [2003] "A framework for performance-based earthquake engineering," Proceedings of ATC-15-9 Workshop on the Improvement of Building Structural Design and Construction Practices, Maui, HI, June.
31. Moehle, J. P. and Deierlein, G. G. [2004] "A framework for performance-based earthquake engineering," Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No 679, Vancouver, Canada.
32. Moehle, J. P. [2010] "27 March 2010 offshore Maule, Chile Earthquake," (oral presentation), Chile EERI/PEER Reconnaissance Briefing at UC Berkeley, March 30, Berkeley, California.
33. Mosalam, K. M. and Günay, M. S. [2010] "Seismic Retrofit of Non-Ductile Reinforced Concrete Frames Using Infill Walls as a Rocking Spine," in Advances of Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering, ed. M. N. Fardis (Springer, Dordrecht) Ch. 33.
34. National Institute of Building Sciences and Federal Emergency Management Agency (NIBS and FEMA) [2003] Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology, Earthquake Model, HAZUS® MH Technical Manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 690 pp.
35. Petersen, M. D., Frankel, A. D., Harmsen, S. C., Mueller, C. S., Haller, K. M., Wheeler, R. L., Wesson, R. L., Zeng, Y., Boyd, O. S., Perkins, D. M., Luco, N., Field, E. H., Wills, C. J., and Rukstales, K. S. [2008] Documentation for the 2008 Update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1128, 61 p.
36. Porter, K. A., Beck, J. L., and Shaikhutdinov, R. V. [2002] "Sensitivity of building loss estimates to major uncertain variables," Earthquake Spectra 18(4), 719-743.
37. Porter, K. A. [2003] "An overview of PEER's performance-based earthquake engineering methodology," Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP9), Civil Engineering Risk and Reliability Association (CERRA), San Francisco, California, July 6-9.
38. Porter, K. A. [2010] "Cracking an Open Safe: Uncertainty in HAZUS-based seismic vulnerability functions," Earthquake Spectra 26(3), 893-900.
39. Power, M., Chiou, B., Abrahamson, N., Bozorgnia, Y., Shantz, T., and Roblee, C. [2008] "An overview of the NGA project," Earthquake Spectra 24(1), 3-21.
40. Rojas, H. A., Foley, C., and Pezeshk, S. [2011] "Risk-based seismic design for optimal structural and nonstructural system performance," Earthquake Spectra 27(3), 857-880.
41. SEAOC Vision 2000 Committee [1995] Performance-based Seismic Engineering, Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, California.
42. Sommerville, P. and Porter, K. A. [2005] "Hazard analysis," in PEER Testbed Study on a Laboratory Building: Exercising Seismic Performance Assessment, ed. M. C. Comerio, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER, Report No. PEER 2005/12, Ch. 3
43. Talaat, M. and Mosalam, K. M. [2009] "Modeling progressive collapse in reinforced concrete buildings using direct element removal," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 38(5), 609-634.