Shake-table experiment on reinforced concrete structure containing masonry infill wall

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 35, Issue 14, 2006, Pages 1827-1852

  Hashemi, Alidad ^a   Mosalam, Khalid M ^a  

^a Berkeley   (United States)

Author keywords

Earthquakes; Infilled frame; Modelling; Reinforced concrete; Shake table; URM wall

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; TESTING; WALLS (STRUCTURAL PARTITIONS);

COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING; SHAKE-TABLE; UNREINFORCED MASONRY (URM) WALL;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

CONCRETE STRUCTURE; DYNAMIC PROPERTY; INFILL; MASONRY; NUMERICAL MODEL; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SHAKING TABLE TEST;

EID: 33750689566     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.612     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Moghaddam HA, Dowling PJ. The state of the art in infilled frames. ESEE Research Report No. 87-2, Civil Engineering Department, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London, 1987.
2. Mosalam KM, White RN, Gergely P. Static response of infilled frames using quasi-static experimentation. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1997; 123(11):1462-1469.
3. Mosalam KM, White RN, Ayala G. Response of infilled frames using pseudo-dynamic experimentation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27(6):589-608.
4. Fardis MN, Bousias SN, Franchioni G, Panagiotakos TB. Seismic response and design of RC structures with plan-eccentric masonry infills. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28(2):173-191.
5. Zarnic R, Gosti S, Crewe AJ, Taylor CA. Shaking table tests of 1:4 reduced-scale models of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frame buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30(6):819-834.
6. Dolce M, Cardone D, Ponzo FC, Valente C. Shaking table tests on reinforced concrete frames without and with passive control systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34(14):1687-1717.
7. Elkhoraibi T, Mosalam KM. Pseudo-dynamic experiment on one-storey RC structure with and without masonry infill. Proceedings of the 100th Anniversary Earthquake Conference Commemorating the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake, 18-22 April 2006.
8. ACI Committee 318. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-02) and Commentary (ACI 318R-02). American Concrete Institute, 2002.
9. Building Seismic Safety Council. NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Part 1: Provisions (FEMA368) and Part 2: Commentary (FEMA369). Washington, DC, 2000.
10. McKenna F, Fenves GL. OpenSees Manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2001, http://opensees.berkeley.edu.
11. Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R. Theoretical stress-strain behaviour of confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1988; 114(8):1804-1826.
12. Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R. Observed stress-strain behaviour of confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1988; 114(8):1827-1849.
13. American Society of Civil Engineers. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, (FEMA 356). Reston, Virginia, 2000.
14. Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering (2nd edn). Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001.
15. ASTM A 615/A 615M. Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, 2001.
16. ASTM C 873-99. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinders Cast-in-Place in Cylindrical Molds. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, 1999.
17. ASTM C 270. Standard Specification for Mortar for Unit Masonry. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, 2003.
18. ASTM C 1314. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, 2003.
19. ASTM E519. Standard Test Method for Diagonal Tension (Shear) in Masonry Assemblages. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, 2002.