Vegetation context influences the strength and targets of pollinator-mediated selection in a deceptive orchid

Ecology

Volumn 94, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1236-1242

  Sletvold, Nina ^a   Grindeland, John Magne ^b   Agren, Jon ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Adaptive significance; Context dependent selection; Dactylorhiza lapponica; Ecological context; Floral evolution; Mechanism of selection; Natural selection; Plant animal interactions; Pollination efficiency; Pollinator attraction

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HERB; NATURAL SELECTION; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POLLINATION; POLLINATOR; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; VEGETATION STRUCTURE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; HISTOLOGY; INSECT; ORCHIDACEAE; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; INSECTS; ORCHIDACEAE; POLLINATION;

ANIMALIA; DACTYLORHIZA LAPPONICA;

EID: 84879589328     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/12-1840.1     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ågren, J., C. Fortunel, and J. Ehrlén. 2006. Selection on floral display in insect-pollinated Primula farinosa: effects of vegetation height and litter accumulation. Oecologia 150: 225-232. (Pubitemid 44607242)
2. Ashman, T.-L., and M. T. Morgan. 2004. Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context? Proceedings of the Royal Society B 271:553-559. (Pubitemid 38365843)
3. Bartowska, M. P., and M. O. Johnston. 2012. Pollinators cause stronger selection than herbivores on floral traits in Lobelia cardinalis (Lobeliaceae). New Phytologist 193:1039-1048.
4. Boberg, E., and J. Ågren. 2009. Despite their apparent integration, spur length but not perianth size affects reproductive success in the moth-pollinated orchid Platanthera bifolia. Functional Ecology 23:1022-1028.
5. Caruso, C. M. 2000. Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 54:1546-1557.
6. Caruso, C. M., S. L. Scott, J. C. Wray, and C. A. Walsh. 2010. Pollinators, herbivores, and the maintenance of flower color variation: a case study with Lobelia siphilitica. International Journal of Plant Sciences 171:1020-1028.
7. Ehrlén, J., S. Kack, and J. Ågren. 2002. Pollen limitation, seed predation and scape length in Primula farinosa. Oikos 97:45-51. (Pubitemid 34589520)
8. Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
9. Fishman, L., and J. H. Willis. 2008. Pollen limitation and natural selection on floral characters in the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. New Phytologist 177:802-810.
10. Galen, C. 1996. Rates of floral evolution: adaptation to bumblebee pollination in an alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 50:120-125.
11. Harder, L. D., and S. D. Johnson. 2009. Darwin's beautiful contrivances: evolutionary and functional evidence for floral adaptation. New Phytologist 183:530-545.
12. Hodgins, K. A., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2008. Natural selection on floral traits through male and female function in wild populations of the heterostylous daffodil Narcissus triandrus. Evolution 62:1751-1763. (Pubitemid 352000101)
13. Johnson, S. D., C. I. Peter, L. A. Nilsson, and J. Ågren. 2003. Pollination success in a deceptive orchid is enhanced by cooccurring rewarding magnet plants. Ecology 84:2919-2927. (Pubitemid 38261440)
14. Johnson, S. D., and K. E. Steiner. 1997. Long-tongued fly pollination and evolution of floral spur length in the Disa draconis complex (Orchidaceae). Evolution 51:45-53.
15. Kilkenny, F. F., and L. F. Galloway. 2008. Reproductive success in varying light environments: direct and indirect effects of light on plants and pollinators. Oecologia 155:247-255.
16. Kingsolver, J. G., S. E. Diamond, A. M. Siepielski, and S. M. Carlson. 2012. Synthetic analyses of phenotypic selection in natural populations: lessons, limitations and future directions. Evolutionary Ecology 26:1101-1118.
17. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gibert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. American Naturalist 157:245-261. (Pubitemid 32214660)
18. Kolb, A., and J. Ehrlén. 2010. Environmental context drives seed predator-mediated selection on a floral display trait. Evolutionary Ecology 24:433-445.
19. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
20. Leger, E. A., and K. J. Rice. 2003. Invasive California poppies (Eschscholzia californica Cham.) grow larger than native individuals under reduced competition. Ecology Letters 6: 257-264. (Pubitemid 36453461)
21. Leimu, R., K. Syrjanen, J. Ehrlén, and K. Lehtila. 2002. Predispersal seed predation in Primula veris: among-population variation in damage intensity and selection on flower number. Oecologia 133:510-516. (Pubitemid 36064372)
22. MacColl, A. D. C. 2011. The ecological causes of evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26:514-522.
23. Moeller, D. A., and M. A. Geber. 2005. Ecological context of the evolution of self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana: population size, plant communities, and reproductive assurance. Evolution 59:786-799. (Pubitemid 40589289)
24. Nilsson, A. N. 1988. The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubes. Nature 334:147-149.
25. O'Connell, L. M., and M. O. Johnston. 1998. Male and female pollination success in a deceptive orchid, a selection study. Ecology 79:1246-1260. (Pubitemid 28378678)
26. Parachnowitsch, A. L., and A. Kessler. 2010. Pollinators exert natural selection on flower size and floral display in Penstemon digitalis. New Phytologist 188:393-402.
27. Primack, R. B., and E. Stacy. 1998. Costs of reproduction in the pink lady's slipper orchid (Cypripedium acaule, Orchidaceae): an eleven-year experimental study in three populations. American Journal of Botany 85:1672-1679.
28. Sandring, S., and J. Ågren. 2009. Pollinator-mediated selection on floral display and flowering time in the perennial herb Arabidopsis lyrata. Evolution 63:1292-1300.
29. Siepielski, A. M., J. D. DiBattista, and S. M. Carlson. 2009. It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild. Ecology Letters 12:1261-1276.
30. Sletvold, N., and J. Ågren. 2010. Pollinator-mediated selection on floral display and spur length in the orchid Gymnadenia conopsea. International Journal of Plant Sciences 171:999-1009.
31. Sletvold, N., and J. Ågren. 2011a. Nonadditive effects of floral display and spur length on reproductive success in a deceptive orchid. Ecology 92:2167-2174.
32. Sletvold, N., and J. Ågren. 2011b. Among-population variation in costs of reproduction in the long-lived orchid Gymnadenia conopsea: an experimental study. Oecologia 167:461-468.
33. Sletvold, N., J. M. Grindeland, and J. Ågren. 2010a. Pollinatormediated selection on floral traits and flowering phenology in the deceptive orchid Dactylorhiza lapponica. New Phytologist 188:385-392.
34. Sletvold, N., D.-I. Øien, and A. Moen. 2010b. Long-term influence of mowing on population dynamics in the rare orchid Dactylorhiza lapponica: the importance of recruitment and seed production. Biological Conservation 143:747-755.
35. Sletvold, N., J. Trunschke, C. Wimmergren, and J.Ågren. 2012. Separating selection by diurnal and nocturnal pollinators on floral display and spur length in Gymnadenia conopsea. Ecology 93:1880-1891.
36. Snow, A. A., and D. F. Whigham. 1989. Costs of flower and fruit production in Tipularia discolor (Orchidaceae). Ecology 70:1286-1293. (Pubitemid 20422031)
37. Wade, M. J., and S. Kalisz. 1990. The causes of natural selection. Evolution 44:1947-1955.