A study of upper extremity training for patients with stroke using a virtual environment system

Journal of Physical Therapy Science

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 575-580

  Tanaka, Toshiaki ^a   Kudo, Akira ^b   Sugihara, Syunichi ^b   Izumi, Takashi ^c   Maeda, Yusuke ^a   Kato, Norio ^d   Miyasaka, Tomoya ^e   Holden, Maureen K ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b Sapporo Shuyukai Hospital   (Japan)

^c TOKAI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e UEKUSA GAKUEN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^f NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hemiplegia; Upper extremity function; Virtual reality technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879583605     PISSN: 09155287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1589/jpts.25.575     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Saeki S, Matsushima Y, Ochi M, et al.: Application of robot-aided therapy for the hemiparetic arm after storke: its effect on the cortical activation. J Clin Rehabil, 2007, 16: 925-932.
2. Miyakoshi K, Domen K, Koyama T, et al.: The effect of robot-aided train-ing on motor recovery following Stroke. Jpn J Rehabil Med, 2006, 43: 347-352.
3. Miyakoshi K: Robot aided training on motor recovery following stroke. Sogo Rihabiriteshon, 2007, 35: 1427-1432.
4. Holden M, Todorov E, Callaban J, et al.: Virtual environment training improves motor performance in two patients with stroke: case report. J Neurol Phys Ther, 1999, 23: 57-67.
5. Holden M: Neurorehabilitation using 'Learning by Imitation' in virtual en-vironments. Usability evaluation and interface design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001, pp 624-628.
6. Holden M, Dyar T: Virtual environment training: a new tool for neuroreha-bilitation. Neurol Rep, 2002, 26: 62-71.
7. Holden M, Dyar T, Schwamm L, et al.: Virtual-environment based Telere-habilitation in patients with stroke. Presence (Camb Mass), 2005, 14: 214-233.
8. Holden MK, Dyar T, Dayan-Cimadoro L: Telerehabilitation using a virtual environment improves upper extremity function in patients with stroke. IEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2007, 15: 36-42.
9. Holden MK, Dettwiler A, Dyar T, et al.: Retaining movement in patients with acquired brain injury using a virtual environment. Stud Health Tech-nol Inform, 2001, 81: 192-198.
10. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, et al.: Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke, 2001, 32: 1635-1639.
11. Granger CV, Hamilton BB: The uniform data system for medical rehabili-tation report of first admissions for 1992. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 1994, 73: 51-55.
12. Viau A, Feldman AG, McFadyen BJ, et al.: Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2004, 1: 1.
13. Levin MF: Interjoint coordination during pointing movements is disrupted in spastic hemiparesis. Brain, 1996, 119: 281-293.
14. Kudo A, Kanaya K, Sasaki T, et al.: A study of the coordination between eye and arm movements in training using virtual environment: analysis of eye's displacement. The Hokkaido Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2009, 26: 79-86.
15. Miyashiro N: Relationship between visual feedback and eye-hand coordi-nation. Japan Industrial Management Association, 1986, 37: 311-316.
16. Yoshida N, Shirogane S, Ino S, et al.: Relationship between hand positions and the corresponding ranges of arm posture: a computational study for application to rehabilitation using exercise devices to control hand posi-tion. Jpn Soc Med Biol Eng, 2007, 45: 242-255.
17. Levin MF, Michaelsen SM, Cirstea CM, et al.: Use of trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res, 2002, 143: 171-180.