Pre-processing, registration and selection of adaptive optics corrected retinal images

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 527-539

  Ramaswamy, Gomathy ^a   Devaney, Nicholas ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Adaptive optics; Image; Image quality assessment; Registration; Retinal images

Indexed keywords

EYE FUNDUS; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; IMAGE PROCESSING; OPTICS; PROCEDURES; RETINA ROD; RETINAL DISEASES; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION; ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY; RETINA DISEASE;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FUNDUS OCULI; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIGHTING; OPTICS AND PHOTONICS; RETINAL DISEASES; RETINAL ROD PHOTORECEPTOR CELLS;

EID: 84879556242     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: 14751313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/opo.12068     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Godara P, Dubis AM, Roorda A, Duncan JL & Carroll J. Adaptive optics retinal imaging: emerging clinical applications. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 930-941.
2. Dubra A, Sulai Y, Norris JL et al. Noninvasive imaging of the human rod photoreceptor mosaic using a confocal adaptive optics scanning ophthalmoscope. Biomed Opt Express 2011; 2: 1864-1876.
3. Tam J, Tiruveedhula P & Roorda A. Characterization of single-file flow through human retinal parafoveal capillaries using an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Biomed Opt Express 2011; 2: 781-793.
4. Roorda A. Adaptive optics for studying visual function-A comprehensive review. J Vis 2011; 11: 1-21.
5. Viard C, Nakashima K, Lamory B, Paques M, Levecq X & Chateau N. Imaging microscopic structures in pathological retinas using a flood-illumination adaptive optics retinal camera. In: Proc. SPIE 7885, Ophthalmic Technologies XXI (Manns F, Söderberg P & Ho A, editors), San Francisco, 2011. SPIE: Bellingham, WA, pp. 788509-788509+10.
6. Serrao S, Buratto L, Lombardo G, De Santo MP, Ducoli P & Lombardo M. Optimal parameters to improve the interface quality of the flap bed in femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 1453-1459.
7. Li H, Lu J, Shi G & Zhang Y. Tracking features in retinal images of adaptive optics confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope using KLT-SIFT algorithm. Biomed Opt Express 2010; 1: 31-40.
8. Vogel CR, Arathorn DW, Roorda A & Parker A. Retinal motion estimation in adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Opt Express 2006; 14: 487-497.
9. Devaney N, Redfern R, Ramirez BE, Renasco GR, Kane PO & Rosa F. Realtime image sharpening. In: Diffraction-Limited Imaging Very large Telescopes (Alloin DM & Mariotti J-M, editors), Cargese: France, 1988; pp. 13-23.
10. Law NM, Mackay CD, Dekany RG et al. Getting lucky with Adaptive Optics: fast AO image selection in the visible with a large telescope. Astrophys J 2008; 692: 924-930.
11. Meitav N & Ribak EN. Improving retinal image resolution with iterative weighted shift-and-add. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2011; 28: 1395-1402.
12. Curcio C, Sloan KR, Kalina RE & Hendrickson E. Human photoreceptor topography. J Comp Neurol. 1990; 292: 497-523.
13. Tomaževič D, Likar B & Pernus F. Comparative evaluation of retrospective shading. J Microsc 2002; 208: 212-223.
14. Cree MJ, Olson JA, Mchardy KC, Sharp PF & Forrester JV. The preprocessing of retinal images for the detection of fluorescein leakage. Phys Med Biol 1999; 44: 293-308.
15. Xu L & Luo S. A novel method for blood vessel detection from retinal images. Biomed Eng Online 2010; 9: 14.
16. Marín D, Aquino A, Gegúndez-arias ME & Bravo JM. A new supervised method for blood vessel segmentation in retinal images by using gray-level and moment invariants-based features. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010; 30: 146-158.
17. Gonzalez RC & Woods RE. Digital Image Processing. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ; 2002.
18. Marrugo AG, Sorel M, Sroubek F & Millán MS. Retinal image restoration by means of blind deconvolution. J Biomed Opt 2011; 16: 116016.
19. Mora AD, Vieira PM, Manivannan A & Fonseca JM. Automated drusen detection in retinal images using analytical modelling algorithms. Biomed Eng Online 2011; 10: 59.
20. Likar B, Maintz JB, Viergever M & Pernus F. Retrospective shading correction based on entropy minimization. J Microsc 2000; 197: 285-295.
21. Ferzli R & Karam LJ. No-reference objective wavelet based noise immune image sharpness metric. Int Conf Image Proc 2005; 1: 405-408.
22. Fleming AD, Philip S, Goatman K, Olson J & Sharp PF. Automated assessment of diabetic retinal image quality based on clarity and field definition. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 1120-1125.
23. Muller RA & Buffington A. Real-time correction of atmospherically degraded telescope images through image sharpening. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1974; 64: 1200-1210.
24. Fienup J & Miller J. Aberration correction by maximizing generalized sharpness metrics. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2003; 20: 609-620.
25. Ferzli R, Girija L & Ali WSI. Efficient implementation of kurtosis based no reference image sharpness metric. In: Proc. SPIE 7532, Image Processing: Algorithms and Systems VIII (Astola JT & Egiazarian KO, editors), San Jose, 2010. SPIE: Bellingham, WA, pp. 75320E-75320E+12.
26. Zitova B. Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vis Comput 2003; 21: 977-1000.
27. Xue B, Choi SS, Doble N & Werner JS. Photoreceptor counting and montaging of en-face retinal images from an adaptive optics fundus camera. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2007; 24: 1364-1372.
28. Faisan S, Lara D & Paterson C. Scanning ophthalmoscope retinal image registration using one-dimensional deformation fields. Opt Express 2011; 19: 4157-4169.
29. Gratadour D, Mugnier LM & Rouan D. Sub-pixel image registration with a maximum likelihood estimator Application to the first adaptive optics observations of Arp 220 in the L band. A&A 2005; 365: 357-365.
30. Solomon C & Breckon T. Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing. A Practical Approach with Examples in Matlab. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2011.
31. Foracchia M, Grisan E & Ruggeri A. Luminosity and contrast normalization in retinal images. Med Image Anal 2005; 9: 179-190.
32. Bedggood P, Daaboul M, Ashman R, Smith G & Metha A. Characteristics of the human isoplanatic patch and implications for adaptive optics retinal imaging. J Biomed Opt 2008; 13: 024008.
33. Nowakowski M, Sheehan M, Neal D & Goncharov AV. Investigation of the isoplanatic patch and wavefront aberration along the pupillary axis compared to the line of sight in the eye. Biomed Opt Express 2012; 3: 240-258.
34. Gim G, Kim H, Lee J & Kim W. Subjective image-quality estimation based on psychophysical experimentation. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Mery D & Rueda L, editors), Santiago, Cgile, 2007. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, pp. 346-356.
35. Barrett HH & Myers KJ. Foundations of Image Science. 1st edition. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ; 2004.