Influence of drying method on the surface energy of cellulose nanofibrils determined by inverse gas chromatography

Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

Volumn 405, Issue , 2013, Pages 85-95

  Peng, Yucheng ^a   Gardner, Douglas J ^a   Han, Yousoo ^a   Cai, Zhiyong ^b   Tshabalala, Mandla A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^b FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cellulose nanofibrils; Drying; Inverse gas chromatography; Surface energy

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTAL (CNC); CELLULOSE NANOFIBRILS; CELLULOSE NANOFIBRILS (CNFS); INFLUENCE OF DRYING METHOD; INVERSE GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; NANOFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE (NFC); RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE;

CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; DISPERSIONS; DRYING; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; LOW TEMPERATURE DRYING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

INTERFACIAL ENERGY;

CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE NANOFIBRIL; NANOMATERIAL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; DILUTION; DISPERSION; FREEZE DRYING; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; MORPHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; SPRAY DRYING; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE;

CELLULOSE; CHROMATOGRAPHY, GAS; FREEZE DRYING; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; NANOPARTICLES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE;

ALGORITHMS; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; DISPERSIONS; DRYING; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE ENERGY;

EID: 84879553860     PISSN: 00219797     EISSN: 10957103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.05.033     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Klemm D., Philipp B., Heinze T., Heinze U., Wagenknecht W. Comprehensive Cellulose Chemistry, Fundamentals and Analytical Methods 1998, vol. 1. Wiley-VCH, New York, USA.
2. Moon R.J., Marini A., Nairn J., Simonsen J., Youngblood J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40:3941-3994.
3. Kolakovic R., Peltonen L., Laaksnen T., Putkisto K., Laukkanen A., Hirvonen J. AAPS PharmSciTech 2011, 12:1366-1373.
4. Dufresne A. Nanocellulose: From Nature to High Performance Tailored Materials 2012, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany.
5. Fengel D., Wegener G. Wood: Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions 1998, De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany.
6. A. Chakraborty, M. Sain, M. Kortschot, Cellulose microfibres as reinforcing agents for structural materials. In: K. Oksman, M. Sain (Eds.), Cellulose Nanocomposites: Processing, Characterization and Properties. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 2005, pp. 169-186.
7. Gardner D.J., Oporto G.S., Mills R., Samir M.A.S.A. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2008, 22:545-567.
8. Herrick F.W., Casebier R.L., Hamilton J.K., Sandberg K.R. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.: Appl. Polym. Symp. 1983, 37:797-813.
9. Hubbe M.A., Rojas O.J., Lucia L.A., Sain M. BioResources 2008, 3:929-980.
10. Saito T., Nishiyama Y., Putaux J., Vignon M., Isogai A. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7:1687-1691.
11. J. Bloch, UMaine to Build Nation's Only Cellulose Nanofibrils Pilot Plant, 2011. .
12. Ferguson W. New Scientist 2012, 2878:24.
13. R. Wallace, USDA under Secretary Sherman Unveils Nanocellulose Production Facility, 2012. .
14. Siro I., Plackett D. Cellulose 2010, 17:459-494.
15. Klemm D., Kramer F., Moritz S., Lindstrom T., Ankerfors M., Gray D., Dorris A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50:5438-5466.
16. Kolakovic R. Nanofibrillar Cellulose in Drug Delivery 2013, University of Helsinki, Finland, Dissertation.
17. Peng Y., Gardner D.J., Han Y. Cellulose 2012, 19:91-102.
18. Peng Y., Han Y., Gardner D.J. Wood Fiber Sci. 2012, 44:448-461.
19. Peng Y., Gardner D.J., Han Y., Kiziltas A., Cai Z., Tshabalala M.A. Influence of drying method on the material properties of cellulose nanofibrils I: thermostability and crystallinity. Cellulose 2013, Accepted for publication.
20. Steele D.F., Moreton R.C., Staniforth J.N., Youn P.M., Tobyn M.J., Edge S. AAPS J. 2008, 10:494-502.
21. Dorris G.M., Gray D.G. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1980, 77:353-362.
22. Lee H.L., Luner P. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 1993, 13:127-144.
23. Jacob P.N., Berg J.C. Langmuir 1994, 10:3086-3093.
24. Garnier G., Glasser W.G. J. Adhes. 1994, 46:165-180.
25. Garnier G., Glasser W.G. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1996, 36:885-894.
26. Tshabalala M.A. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997, 55:1013-1020.
27. Kazayawoko M., Balatinecz J.J., Romansky M. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1997, 190:408-415.
28. D.J. Gardner, S.Q. Shi, W.T. Tze, Comparison of acid-base characterization techniques on lignocellulosic surfaces, in: Acid-base Interactions: Relevance to Adhesion Science and Technology, VSP, Utrecht, 2000, pp. 363-383.
29. Papirer E., Brendle E., Balard H., Vergelati C. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2000, 14:321-337.
30. Santos J.M.R.C.A., Gil M.H., Portugal A., Guthrie J.T. Cellulose 2001, 8:217-224.
31. Heng J.Y.Y., Pearse D.F., Thielmann F., Lampke T., Bismarck A. Compos. Interfaces 2007, 14:581-604.
32. Mills R.H., Gardner D.J., Wimmer R. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 110:3880-3888.
33. Rani P.R., Ramanaiah S., Reddy K.S. Surf. Interface Anal. 2011, 43:683-688.
34. Csiszár E., Fekete E. Langmuir 2011, 27:8444-8450.
35. Rjiba N., Nardin M., Drean J.Y., Frydrych R. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 314:373-380.
36. Belgacem M.N., Blayo A., Gandini A. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1996, 182:431-436.
37. Hult E.L., Larsson P.T., Iversen T. Polymer 2001, 42:3309-3314.
38. Chunilall V., Bush T., Larsson P.T., Iversen T., Kindness A. Holzforschung 2010, 64:693-698.
39. Rämänen P., Penttilä P.A., Svedström K., Maunu S.L., Serimaa R. Cellulose 2012, 19:901-912.
40. Conder J.R., Young C.L. Physicochemical Measurement by Gas Chromatography 1979, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England.
41. Balard H., Maafa D., Santini A., Donnet J.B. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1198-1199:173-180.
42. Thielmann F. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1037:115-123.
43. James A.T., Martin A.J.P. Biochem. J. 1952, 679-690.
44. Schultz J., Lavielle L., Martin C. J. Adhes. 1987, 23:45-60.
45. Fowkes F.M. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1964, 56:40-52.
46. Gutmann V. The Donor-Acceptor Approach to Molecular Interactions 1978, Plenum Press, New York.
47. Fowkes F.M. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 1990, 4:669-691.
48. Saint-Flour C., Papirer E. Inid. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 1982, 21:666-669.
49. J. Schultz, L. Lavielle, Interfacial properties of carbon fiber-epoxy matrix composites. Inverse Gas Chromatography - Characterization of Polymers and Other Materials. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1989.
50. Riddle F.L., Fowkes F.M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112:3259-3264.
51. W.A. Zisman, Relationship of equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid constitution, in: F.M. Fowkes (Ed.), Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion vol. 43, 1964, pp. 1-51.
52. Svagan A.J., Azizi Samir M.A.S., Bergund L.A. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20:1263-1269.
53. Quinn E.L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1927, 49:2704-2711.
54. Wang B., Huang L.X., Mujumdar A.S. Drying of nanosize products. Hankbook of Industrial Drying 2007, 713-727. CRC Press, New York. third ed. A.S. Mujumdar (Ed.).
55. Montès H., Cavaillé J.Y. Polymer 1999, 40:2649-2657.
56. Meißner D., Einfeldt J., Kwasniewski A. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2000, 275:199-209.
57. Agarwal V., Huber G.W., Conner W.C., Auerbach S. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 135:134506-1-134506-13.
58. Awoyemi L., Femi-Ola T.O., Aderibigbe Y. J. Indian Acad. Wood Sci. 2010, 7:19-24.
59. Rånby B.G. Acta. Chem. Scand. 1949, 3:649-650.
60. Lu P., Hsieh Y. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82:329-336.