The PRISMA statement: A step in the improvement of the publications of the Revista Española de Salud Pública;La declaración prisma: Un paso adelante en la mejora de las publicaciones de la revista Española de salud pública

Revista Espanola de Salud Publica

Volumn 87, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 99-102

  Urrútia, Gerard ^a,b   Bonfilll, Xavier ^a,b,c  

^a Institut d'Investigació Biomèdida Sant Pau   (Spain)

^b CIBER EPIDEMIOLOGÍA Y SALUD PÚBLICA CIBERESP   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SPAIN; STANDARD; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; SPAIN;

EID: 84879539256     PISSN: 11355727     EISSN: 16969820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4321/S1135-57272013000200001     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I (2010) Seventyfive trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med 7:e1000326.
2. Higgins J P T, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Disponible en: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
3. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet. 1999;354:1896-900.
4. Urrutia G, Tort S, Bonfill X. Metaanálisis (QUO-ROM). Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125(Supl 1):32-7.
5. PRISMA. Transparent Reporting of sistematyc Reviews and Meta-Analises. Disponible en: http://www.prisma-statement.org/index.htm
6. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
7. Equator Network. Disponible en: http://www.equator-network.org/ (citado el 4-4-2013)
8. Urrútia G, Bonfill X. Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metanálisis. Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Oct. 9;135(11):507-11.
9. Simera I, Moher D, Hirst A, Hoey J, Schulz KF, et al. Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med 2010;8:24.
10. Tao KM, Li XQ, Zhou QH, Moher D, Ling CQ, Yu WF. From QUOROM to PRISMA: a survey of highimpact medical journals' instructions to authors and a review of systematic reviews in anesthesia literature. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27611.
11. Willis BH, Quigley M. The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Dec. 9;11:163.
12. Meerpohl JJ, Herrle F, Antes G, Von Elm E. Scientific value of systematic reviews: survey of editors of core clinical journals. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35732.
13. The Cochrane Collaboration. Disponible en: http://epoc.cochrane.org/ (citado el 4-4-2013)