-
1
-
-
0004974097
-
-
Ceballos C, Valdizan JR, Artal A, Almarcegui, Allepuz C, García Campayo, et al. ¿Por qué la medicina basada en la evidencia? 20 años de metanálisis. An Med Interna. 2000;17:521-6.
-
Ceballos C, Valdizan JR, Artal A, Almarcegui, Allepuz C, García Campayo, et al. ¿Por qué la medicina basada en la evidencia? 20 años de metanálisis. An Med Interna. 2000;17:521-6.
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
1642423578
-
¿Cómo realizar, evaluar y utilizar revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis?
-
Gispert JP, Bonfill X. ¿Cómo realizar, evaluar y utilizar revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis? Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;27(3):129-49.
-
(2004)
Gastroenterol Hepatol
, vol.27
, Issue.3
, pp. 129-149
-
-
Gispert, J.P.1
Bonfill, X.2
-
3
-
-
34547813064
-
-
Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JPT, editors. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.2.2 [updated December 2003]. En: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
-
Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JPT, editors. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.2.2 [updated December 2003]. En: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
9444255722
-
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement
-
Begg CB, Cho MK, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996;276:637-9.
-
(1996)
JAMA
, vol.276
, pp. 637-639
-
-
Begg, C.B.1
Cho, M.K.2
Eastwood, S.3
Horton, R.4
Moher, D.5
Olkin, I.6
-
5
-
-
0033610734
-
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement
-
Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet. 1999;354:1896-900.
-
(1999)
Lancet
, vol.354
, pp. 1896-1900
-
-
Moher, D.1
Cook, D.J.2
Eastwood, S.3
Olkin, I.4
Rennie, D.5
Stroup, D.F.6
-
6
-
-
0027273422
-
Should unpublished data be included in meta-analysis? Current convictions and controversies
-
Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Ryan G, Clifton J, Buckingham L, Willan A, et al. Should unpublished data be included in meta-analysis? Current convictions and controversies. JAMA. 1993;269:2749-53.
-
(1993)
JAMA
, vol.269
, pp. 2749-2753
-
-
Cook, D.J.1
Guyatt, G.H.2
Ryan, G.3
Clifton, J.4
Buckingham, L.5
Willan, A.6
-
8
-
-
0002519524
-
Publication bias and meta-analysis
-
Smith ML. Publication bias and meta-analysis. Eval Educ. 1980;4:22-4.
-
(1980)
Eval Educ
, vol.4
, pp. 22-24
-
-
Smith, M.L.1
-
9
-
-
0345545023
-
Does the language of publication of reports of randomized controlled trials influence the estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?
-
Moher D, Pham B, Klassen TP, Schulz KF, Berlin JA, Jadad AR, et al. Does the language of publication of reports of randomized controlled trials influence the estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? 6th Cochrane Colloquium; 1998.
-
(1998)
6th Cochrane Colloquium
-
-
Moher, D.1
Pham, B.2
Klassen, T.P.3
Schulz, K.F.4
Berlin, J.A.5
Jadad, A.R.6
-
10
-
-
85047692188
-
Empirical evidence of bias: Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
-
Schultz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995:273:408-12.
-
(1995)
JAMA
, vol.273
, pp. 408-412
-
-
Schultz, K.F.1
Chalmers, I.2
Hayes, R.J.3
Altman, D.G.4
-
11
-
-
0032558314
-
Does the quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
-
Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al. Does the quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet. 1998;352:609-13.
-
(1998)
Lancet
, vol.352
, pp. 609-613
-
-
Moher, D.1
Pham, B.2
Jones, A.3
Cook, D.J.4
Jadad, A.R.5
Moher, M.6
-
12
-
-
0029914622
-
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
-
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Garabhan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1-12.
-
(1996)
Control Clin Trials
, vol.17
, pp. 1-12
-
-
Jadad, A.R.1
Moore, R.A.2
Carroll, D.3
Jenkinson, C.4
Reynolds, D.J.5
Garabhan, D.J.6
-
13
-
-
0030739904
-
Does blinding of readers affect the results of metaanalyses?
-
Berlin JA on behalf of the University of Pennsylvania meta-analysis blinding study group
-
Berlin JA on behalf of the University of Pennsylvania meta-analysis blinding study group. Does blinding of readers affect the results of metaanalyses? Lancet. 1997;350:185-6.
-
(1997)
Lancet
, vol.350
, pp. 185-186
-
-
-
14
-
-
1442354597
-
TREND Group. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement
-
Des Jarlais D, Lyles C, Crepaz N; TREND Group. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:361-6.
-
(2004)
Am J Public Health
, vol.94
, pp. 361-366
-
-
Des Jarlais, D.1
Lyles, C.2
Crepaz, N.3
-
15
-
-
0038649980
-
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative
-
Bossuyt P, Reitsma J, Bruns D, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:51-5.
-
(2003)
AJR Am J Roentgenol
, vol.181
, pp. 51-55
-
-
Bossuyt, P.1
Reitsma, J.2
Bruns, D.3
Gatsonis, C.A.4
Glasziou, P.P.5
Irwig, L.M.6
-
16
-
-
0034685429
-
Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal of reporting
-
Stroup D, Berlin J, Morton S, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal of reporting. JAMA. 2000;283:2008-12.
-
(2000)
JAMA
, vol.283
, pp. 2008-2012
-
-
Stroup, D.1
Berlin, J.2
Morton, S.3
Olkin, I.4
Williamson, G.D.5
Rennie, D.6
-
17
-
-
0035117037
-
Quality of reporting of meta-analyses: The QUOROM statement. Will it help?
-
Christensen E. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses: the QUOROM statement. Will it help? J Hepatol. 2001;34:342-5.
-
(2001)
J Hepatol
, vol.34
, pp. 342-345
-
-
Christensen, E.1
-
18
-
-
18444382649
-
Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: Survey of instructions for authors
-
Altman DG. Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors. BMJ. 2005;330:1056-7.
-
(2005)
BMJ
, vol.330
, pp. 1056-1057
-
-
Altman, D.G.1
-
19
-
-
0034716596
-
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: Critical evaluation
-
Jadad AR, Moher M, Browman GP, Booker L, Sigouin C, Fuentes M, et al. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation. BMJ. 2000;320:537-40.
-
(2000)
BMJ
, vol.320
, pp. 537-540
-
-
Jadad, A.R.1
Moher, M.2
Browman, G.P.3
Booker, L.4
Sigouin, C.5
Fuentes, M.6
|