Learning to live with a permanent intestinal ostomy: Impact on everyday life and educational needs

Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 407-412

  Danielsen, Anne Kjaergaard ^a   Soerensen, Erik Elgaard ^b   Burcharth, Kirsten ^b   Rosenberg, Jacob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b AALBORG UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Patient education; Permanent ostomy; Qualitative content analysis; Quality of life; Stoma

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COLOSTOMY; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL STIGMA; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COLOSTOMY; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; ILEOSTOMY; INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; SOCIAL STIGMA;

EID: 84879508997     PISSN: 10715754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182987e0e     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Persson E, Bendtsen I, Carlsson E. Stomi-Och Tarmopererad: Ett Helhetsperspektiv [Stoma surgery: A coherent perspective]. Sweden : Studentlitteratur; 2008.
2. Montedori A, Cirocchi R, Sciannamo F, Abraha I. Covering iloe-or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (5) : CD006878.
3. Sprangers MA, Taal BG, Aaronson NK, Te VA. Quality of life in colorectal cancer. Stoma vs. nonstoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 ; 38 : 361-369.
4. Hamashima C. Long-term quality of life of postoperative rectal cancer patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002 ; 17 : 571-576.
5. Brown H, Randle J. Living with a stoma: A review of the literature. J Clin Nurs. 2005 ; 14 : 74-81.
6. Mohler MJ, Coons SJ, Hornbrook MC, et al. The health-related quality of life in long-term colorectal cancer survivors study: Objectives, methods and patient sample. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 ; 24 : 2059-2070.
7. Pachler J, Wille-Jorgensen P. Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; (2) : CD004323.
8. Umanskiy K, Fichera A. Health related quality of life in infl ammatory bowel disease: The impact of surgical therapy. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 ; 16 : 5024-5034.
9. Bekkers MJ, van Knippenberg FC, van den Borne HW, Poen H, Bergsma J, van BergeHenegouwen GP. Psychosocial adaptation to stoma surgery: A review. J Behav Med. 1995 ; 18 : 1-31.
10. Nugent KP, Daniels P, Stewart B, Patankar R, Johnson CD. Quality of life in stoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 ; 42 : 1569-1574.
11. Holzer B, Matzel K, Schiedeck T, et al. Do geographic and educational factors infl uence the quality of life in rectal cancer patients with a permanent colostomy? Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 ; 48 : 2209-2216.
12. Ma N, Harvey J, Stewart J, Andrews L, Hill AG. The effect of age on the quality of life of patients living with stomas: A pilot study. ANZ J Surg. 2007 ; 77 : 883-885.
13. Carlsson E, Bosaeus I, Nordgren S. Quality of life and concerns in patients with short bowel syndrome. Clin Nutr. 2003 ; 22 : 445-452.
14. Colquhoun P, Kaiser R, Weiss EG, et al. Correlating the fecal incontinence quality of life score and the SF-36 to a proposed ostomy function index in patients with a stoma. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006 ; 52 (12) : 68-74.
15. Bloemen JG, Visschers RG, Truin W, Beets GL, Konsten JL. Long-term quality of life in patients with rectal cancer: Association with severe postoperative complications and presence of a stoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 ; 52 : 1251-1258.
16. Gögenur I, Wittendorff H-E, Colstrup H, Rosenberg J, Fischer A. Følger efter behandling af kolorektal cancer med særlig fokus på stomiproblemer, urologiske følgetilstande og seksuel dysfunktion. [Complications after treatment of colorectal cancer, with special focus on stomas, urological conditions and sexual dysfunction]. Ugeskrift for Laeger. 2005 ; 167 : 4272-4273.
17. Cottam J, Richards K, Hasted A, Blackman A. Results of a nationwide prospective audit of stoma complications within 3 weeks of surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2007 ; 9 : 834-838.
18. Shabbir J, Britton DC. Stoma complications: A literature overview. Colorectal Dis. 2010 ; 12 : 958-964.
19. Butler DL. Early postoperative complications following ostomy surgery: A review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009 ; 36 (5) : 513-519.
20. Persson E, Wilde LB. Quality of care after ostomy surgery: A perspective study of patients. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2005 ; 51 (8) : 40-48.
21. Colwell JC, Gray M. Does preoperative teaching and stoma site marking affect surgical outcomes in patients undergoing ostomy surgery? J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2007 ; 34 : 492-496.
22. Simmons KL, Smith JA, Bobb K-A, Liles LLM. Adjustment to colostomy: Stoma acceptance, stoma care self-effi cacy and interpersonal relationships. J Adv Nurs. 2007 ; 60 : 627-635.
23. Palmer M, Larkin M, de Visser R, Fadden G. Developing an interpretative phenomenological approach to focus group data. Qual Res Psychol. 2010 ; 7 : 99-121.
24. Starks H, Brown S. Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis and grounded theory. Qual Health Res. 2007 ; 17 : 1372-1380.
25. Webb C, Kevern J. Focus groups as a research method: A critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 2001 ; 33 : 798-805.
26. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 ; 19 : 349-357.
27. Simera I, Moher D, Hoey J, Schulz KF, Altman DG. A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research. Eur J Clin Invest. 2010 ; 40 : 35-53.
28. Lowes L, Prowse M. Standing outside the interview process? The illusion of objectivity in phenomenological data generation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2001 ; 8 : 471-480.
29. Nyström Maria. Hermeneutik [Hermeneutic]. In: Granskär M, Hôglund-Nielsen B eds. Tillämpad Kvalitativ Forskning Inom Hälso-Och Sjukvård [Applied qualitative research in health and nursing]. Sweden : Studentlitteratur; 2008 : 125-143.
30. Danielsen AK, Spanager L. Anvendelse af fokusgruppeinterview inden for sundhedsvidenskab. Ugeskrift for Laeger. 2012 ; 174 : 1298-1302.
31. Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interview. En Introduktion Til Det Kvalitative Forskningsinterview [InterView.] Denmark : Hans Reitzels Forlag; 2009.
32. Sandelowski M. Notes on transcription. Res Nurs Health. 1994 ; 17 : 311-314.
33. Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography. Principles in Practice. 3rd ed. London UK : Routledge; 2007.
34. Downe-Wamboldt B. Content analysis: Method, applications and issues. Health Care Women Int. 1992 ; 13 : 313-321.
35. Sandelowski M. What ever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000 ; 23 : 334-340.
36. Lundman B, Graneheim UH. Kvalitative innehållsanalyse [Qualitative content analysis]. In: Granskär M, Höglund-Nielsen B, eds. Tillämpad Kvalitative Forskning Inom Hälso-Och Sjukvård [Adjusted qualitative content analysis in healthcare] Sweden : Studentlitteratur; 2008.
37. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of Nursing Research. Methods, Appraisal and Utilization. Philadelphia, PA : Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 2006.
38. Soerensen E, Delmar C, Pedersen BD, Leading nurses in dire straits: Head nurses' navigation between nursing and leadership roles. J Nurs Manag. 2011 ; 19 : 421-430.
39. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2005 ; 62 : 107-115.
40. QSR International. NVIVO 8 Getting startet. QSR International. http://www.qsrinternational.com/FileResourceHandler.ashx/RelatedDocuments/ DocumentFile/289/NVivo8-Getting-Started-Guide.pdf. Last accessed July 2012.
41. Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illn. 1994 ; 16 : 103-121.
42. Barbour RS. Doing Focus Groups. London UK : Sage Publications; 2007.
43. Van Brakel WH. Measuring health-related stigma-A literature review. Psychol Health Med. 2006 ; 11 : 307-334.
44. Kilinc S, Campbell C. It shouldn't be something that's evil, it should be talked about: A phenomenological approach to epilepsy and stigma. Seizure. 2009 ; 18 : 665-671.
45. Goffmann E. Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London, UK : Penguinn Books Ltd.; 1963.
46. Joachim G, Acorn S. Stigma of visible and invisible chronic conditions. J Adv Nurs. 2000 ; 32 : 343-348.
47. MacDonald LD, Anderson HR. Stigma in patients with rectal cancer: A community study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1984 ; 38 : 284-290.
48. Smith DM, Loewenstein G, Rozin P, Sherriff RL, Ubel PA. Sensitivity to disgust, stigma, and adjustment to life with a colostomy. J Res Pers. 2007 ; 41 : 787-803.
49. Bury M. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociol Health Illn. 1982 ; 4 : 167-82.
50. Hubbard G, Kidd L, Kearney N. Disrupted lives and threats to identity: The experiences of people with colorectal cancer within the fi rst year following diagnosis. Health. 2010 ; 14 : 131-146.
51. Dickson A, Allan D, O'carroll R. Biographical disruption and the experience of loss following a spinal cord injury: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychol Health. 2008 ; 23 : 407-425.
52. Chaudry S, Brown L, Hassan I, Horgan A. Preoperative intensive, community-based vs. traditional stoma education: A randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 ; 48 : 504-509.
53. Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK. Health Behaviour and Health Education. Theory, Research and Practice. Jossey-Bass Publishers; San Francisco, California, USA 1997.
54. Rehse B, Pukrop R. Effects of psychosocial interventions on quality of life in adult cancer patients: Meta analysis of 37 published controlled outcome studies. Patient Educ Couns. 2003 ; 50 : 179-186.
55. Foster G, Taylor SJC, Eldridge S, Ramsay J, Griffiths CJ. Selfmanagement education programmes by lay leaders for people with chronic conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 : (4) : CD005108.
56. Delmar C. "Generalizability" as recognition: Refl ections on a foundational problem in qualitative research. Qual Stud. 2010 ; 1 : 115-128.