Evaluating the EU ETS impacts on profits, investments and prices of the Italian electricity market

Energy Policy

Volumn 59, Issue , 2013, Pages 242-256

  Bonenti, Francesca ^a   Oggioni, Giorgia ^a   Allevi, Elisabetta ^a   Marangoni, Giacomo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

^b FONDAZIONE ENI ENRICO MATTEI   (Italy)

Author keywords

EU ETS; Investments; Italian electricity market

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; COMPLEMENTARITY PROBLEMS; ELECTRICITY MARKET; EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME; FOREIGN COUNTRIES; LIMITED CAPACITY; PERFECT COMPETITION; USE OF RENEWABLE ENERGIES;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMERCE; COMPETITION; ELECTRIC INDUSTRY; INVESTMENTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

GAS EMISSIONS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENERGY MARKET; EUROPEAN UNION; INVESTMENT; LEADERSHIP; OLIGOPOLY; POLLUTION POLICY; POWER GENERATION; PRICE DYNAMICS;

EID: 84879503022     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.026     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson E.J., Hu X. Finding supply function equilibria with symmetric firms. Operation Research 2008, 56:697-711.
2. x permits. IEEE Transactions on Power System 2005, 20(1):119-129.
3. x allowances markets. Computational Management Sciences 2006, 3(4):307-330.
4. 2 emissions trading for short-run electricity market outcomes in northwest Europe. Journal of Regulatory Economics 2008, 34:23-44.
5. Facchinei F., Pang J.-S. Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems 2003, vols. 1 and 2. Springer, New York.
6. Floro, D., 2009. Selecting oligopolistic models in the Italian wholesale electricity market. In: IEEEXplore, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM 2009). Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=5207162.
7. Harker P.T., Pang J.-S. Finite-dimensional variational inequality and nonlinear complementarity problems. a survey of theory, algorithms and applications. Mathematical Programming 1990, 115:153-188.
8. Hartmann P., Stampacchia G. On some nonlinear elliptical differential functional equations. Acta Mathematica 1966, 48:161-220.
9. Hobbs B.H. Linear complementarity models of Nash-Cournot competition in bilateral and POOLCO power markets. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems 2001, 16(2):194-202.
10. Hobbs B.F., Helman U. Complementarity-based equilibrium modeling for electric power markets. Modeling Prices in Competitive Electricity Markets 2004, 69-98. J. Wiley. D. Bunn (Ed.).
11. International Council for Capital Formation-ICCF, 2005. Kyoto Protocol and Beyond: the Economic Cost to Italy. Available at: http://www.iccfglobal.org/pdf/Italyfinal101705.pdf.
12. 2 emissions trading on electricity markets and electricity consumers in Finland. Energy Economics 2008, 30:193-211.
13. Limpaitoon T., Chen T., Oren S.S. The impact of carbon cap and trade regulation on congested electricity market equilibrium. Journal of Regulatory Economics 2011, 40:237-260.
14. 2 emissions trading and green certificates into a power generation expansion model. Automatica 2008, 44:1608-1620.
15. Lise W., Sijm J., Hobbs B.H. The impact of the EU ETS on prices, profits and emissions in the power sector. simulation results with the COMPETES EU20 model. Environmental and Resource Economics 2010, 47:23-44.
16. Neuhoff K., Keats K., Sato M. Allocation, incentives and distortions. the impact of EU ETS emission allowance allocations to the electricity sector. Climate Policy 2006, 6(1):73-91.
17. Neuhoff K., Ahman M., Betz R., Cludius J., Ferrario F., Holmgren K., Pal G., Grubb M., Matthes F., Rogge K., Sato M., Schleich J., Sijm J., Tuerk A., Kettner C., Walker N. Implications of announced phase 2 national allocation plans for the EU ETS. Climate Policy 2006, 6(5):41-422.
18. Oggioni G., Smeers Y. Evaluating the impact of average cost based contracts on the industrial sector in the European emission trading scheme. Central European Journal of Operations Research 2009, 17(2):181-217.
19. Ortega J.M., Rheinboldt W.C. Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables 1970, Academic Press, New York.
20. Ralph, D., Smeers, Y., 2006. EPECs as models for electricity markets. In: Invited paper, Power Systems Conference and Exposition (PSCE), p. 7480, doi:10.1109/PSCE.2006.296252.
21. Reinaud, J., 2003. Emission trading and its possible impacts on investment decisions in the power sector. IEA Information Paper.
22. Reinaud, J., 2005. Industrial competitiveness under the European Union Emission Trading Scheme. IEA Information Paper.
23. Sijm J.P.M., Neuhoff K., Chen Y. Cost pass thought and windfall profits in the power sector. Climate Policy 2006, 5(1):61-78.
24. Terna, 2006. Previsioni della domanda elettrica in Italia e del fabbisogno di potenza necessario. Available at: http://www.terna.it/default/Home/SISTEMA_ELETTRICO/statistiche/previsioni_domanda_elettrica.aspx.
25. Tirole J. The Theory of Industrial Organization 1988, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
26. Ventosa M., Baillo A., Ramos A., Rivier M. Electricity market modelling trends. Energy Policy 2005, 33:897-913.
27. Vespucci M.T., Allevi E., Gnudi A., Innorta M. Cournot equilibria in oligopolistic electricity markets. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 2010, 21(2):183-193.
28. Vives X. Oligopoly Pricing. Old Ideas and New Tools 1999, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
29. Willems B., Rumiantseva I., Weigt H. Cournot versus supply functions. What does the data tell us?. Energy Economics 2009, 31:38-47.
30. Yao J., Adler I., Oren S.S. Modeling and computing two-settlement oligopolistic equilibrium in a congested electricity network. Operations Research 2008, 56(1):34-47.