Modeling multisystem biological risk in later life: Allostatic load in the lothian birth cohort study 1936

American Journal of Human Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 538-543

  Booth, Tom ^a   Starr, John M ^a   Deary, Ian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIDIABETIC AGENT; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT; ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; ANTILIPEMIC AGENT; AUTACOID; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; C REACTIVE PROTEIN; FIBRINOGEN; GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN; INTERLEUKIN 6; LIPID;

AGED; AGING; ALLOSTASIS; ARTICLE; BLOOD; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY MASS; COHORT ANALYSIS; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; UNITED KINGDOM;

AGED; AGING; ALLOSTASIS; ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTS; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY MASS INDEX; C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; COHORT STUDIES; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FIBRINOGEN; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS; HYPOLIPIDEMIC AGENTS; INFLAMMATION MEDIATORS; INTERLEUKIN-6; LIPIDS; MALE; SCOTLAND;

EID: 84879460949     PISSN: 10420533     EISSN: 15206300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22406     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bollen KA. 1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
2. Chen FF. 2007. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equation Model 14:464-504.
3. Chen FF, Sousa KH, West SG. 2005. Teacher's corner: testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Struct Equation Model 12:471-492.
4. Crimmins EM, Johnston M, Hayward M, Seeman T. 2003. Age differences in allostatic load: an index of physiological dysregulation. Exp Gerontol 38:731-734.
5. Deary IJ, Gow AJ, Pattie A, Starr JM. 2012. Cohort profile: The Lothian Birth Cohorts of 1921 and 1936. Int J Epidemiol 41:1576-1584.
6. Deary IJ, Gow AJ, Taylor MD, Corley J, Brett C, Wilson V, Campbell H, Whalley LJ, Visscher PM, Porteous DJ, Starr JM. 2007. The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936: a study to examine influences on cognitive ageing from age 11 to age 70 and beyond. BMC Geriatr 7:28.
7. Dudley JT, Butte AJ. 2009. Identification of discriminating biomarkers for human disease using integrative network biology. Pac Symp Biocomput 14:27-38.
8. Ganzel BL, Morris PA. 2011. Allostasis and the developing human brain: explicit consideration of implicit models. Dev Psychopathol 23:955-974.
9. Hu LT, Bentler PM. 1999. Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model 6:1-55.
10. Juster R-P, McEwen BS, Lupien SJ. 2010. Allostatic load biomarkers of chronic stress and impact on health and cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35:2-16.
11. Karatsoreos IN, McEwen BS. 2011. Psychobiological allostasis: resistance, resilience and vulnerability. Trends Cogn Sci 15:576-584.
12. Lykken DT. 1968. Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychol Bull 70:151-159.
13. MacCallum RC, Zhang S, Preacher KJ, Rucker DD. 2002. On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychol Methods 7:19-40.
14. McCaffery JM, Marsland AL, Strohacker K, Muldoon MF, Manuck SB. 2012. Factor Structure Underlying Components of Allostatic Load. PloS one 7:e47246.
15. McEwen BS, Wingfield JC. 2003. The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine. Horm Behav 43:2-15.
16. Meredith W. 1993. Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika 58:525-543.
17. Muthen LK, Muthen BO. 2010. Mplus user's guide, 6th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
18. Philippe P, Mansi O. 1998. Nonlinearity in the epidemiology of complex health and disease processes. Theor Med Bioeth 19:591-607.
19. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Muller H. 2003. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res 8:23-74.
20. Seeman TE, Gruenewald T, Karlamangla A, Sidney S, Liu K, McEwen B, Schwartz J. 2010. Modeling multisystem biological risk in young adults: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study. Am J Hum Biol 22:463-472.
21. Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. 2000. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods 3:4-70.