On the persistence of Cenococcum geophilum ectomycorrhizas and its implications for forest carbon and nutrient cycles

Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Volumn 65, Issue , 2013, Pages 141-143

  Fernandez, Christopher W ^a   McCormack, M Luke ^a,b   Hill, Jason M ^c   Pritchard, Seth G ^d   Koide, Roger T ^e  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^c Pennsylvania Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit   (United States)

^d School of Business   (United States)

^e BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biogeochemistry; C cycling; Cenococcum geophilum; Decomposition; Ectomycorrhizal fungi; N cycling; Root turnover

Indexed keywords

C CYCLING; CENOCOCCUM GEOPHILUM; ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGI; N CYCLING; ROOT TURNOVER;

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; DECOMPOSITION; ECOLOGY; FUNGI; NUTRIENTS;

FORESTRY;

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; BIOMASS; CARBON CYCLE; DECOMPOSITION; ECTOMYCORRHIZA; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FUNGUS; LITTER; SOIL ORGANIC MATTER; TURNOVER;

DECAY; ECOLOGY; FORESTRY; FUNGI; NUTRIENTS;

EID: 84879434315     PISSN: 00380717     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.022     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bell A.A., Wheeler M.H. Biosynthesis and functions of fungal melanins. Annual Review of Phytopathology 1986, 24:411-451.
2. Butler M.J., Day A.W. Fungal melanins: a review. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 1998, 44:1115-1136.
3. Cairney J.W.G. Extramatrical mycelia of ectomycorrhizal fungi as moderators of carbon dynamics in forest soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2012, 47:198-208.
4. Christensen R.H.B. Ordinal-Regression Models for Ordinal Data R Package Version 2012.01-19 2012.
5. Clemmensen K.E., Bahr A., Ovaskainen O., Dahlberg A., Ekblad A., Wallander H., Stenlid J., Finlay R.D., Wardle D.A., Lindahl B.D. Roots and associated fungi drive long-term carbon sequestration in boreal forest. Science 2013, 339:1615-1618.
6. Dahlberg A., Jonsson L., Nylund J.E. Species diversity and distribution of biomass above and below ground among ectomycorrhizal fungi in an old-growth Norway spruce forest in south Sweden. Canadian Journal of Botany 1997, 75:1323-1335.
7. Dickie I.A. Host preference, niches and fungal diversity. New Phytologist 2007, 174:230-233.
8. Ekblad A., Wallander H., Godbold D.L., Cruz C., Johnson D., Baldrian P., Plassard C. The production and turnover of extramatrical mycelium of ectomycorrhizal fungi in forest soils: role in carbon cycling. Plant and Soil 2013, 366(1-2):1-27.
9. Feofilova E.P. The fungal cell wall: modern concepts of its composition and biological function. Microbiology 2010, 79:711-720.
10. Fernandez C.W., Koide R.T. The role of chitin in the decomposition of ectomycorrhizal fungal litter. Ecology 2012, 93:24-28.
11. Hobbie E.A. Carbon allocation to ectomycorrhizal fungi correlates with belowground allocation in culture studies. Ecology 2006, 87:563-569.
12. Hunt G.A., Fogel R. Fungal hyphal dynamics in a western Oregon Douglas-fir stand. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 1983, 15:641-649.
13. 14C-labeled cell wall and cytoplasmic fractions from hyaline and melanic fungi. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1969, 33:707-711.
14. Jackson R., Mooney H.A., Schulze E.D. Aglobal budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1997, 94:7362-7366.
15. Kaplan E.L., Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1958, 53:457-481.
16. Koide R.T., Malcolm G.M. Nconcentration controls decomposition rates of different strains of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Fungal Ecology 2009, 2:197-202.
17. Koide R.T., Shumway D.L., Xu B., Sharda J.N. On temporal partitioning of a community of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 2007, 174:420-429.
18. Koide R.T., Fernandez C.W., Peoples M.S. Can ectomycorrhizal colonization of Pinus resinosa roots affect their decomposition?. New Phytologist 2011, 191:508-514.
19. Kuo M.J., Alexander M. Inhibition of the lysis of fungi by melanins. Journal of Bacteriology 1967, 94:624-629.
20. Langley J.A., Hungate B.A. Mycorrhizal controls on belowground litter quality. Ecology 2003, 84:2302-2312.
21. Langley J.A., Chapman S.K., Hungate B.A. Ectomycorrhizal colonization slows root decomposition: the post-mortem fungal legacy. Ecology Letters 2006, 9:955-959.
22. 14C-labeled melanoid fungal residues in a marginally sodic soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 1982, 14:457-460.
23. Martin J.P., Ervin J.O., Shepherd R.A. Decomposition and aggregating effect of fungus cell material in soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1959, 23:217-220.
24. Meyer F.H. The role of the fungus Cenococcum graniforme (Sow.) Ferd. et Winge in the formation of mor. Soil Micromorphology 1964, 23-31. Elsevier Publishing Co., New York. A. Jongerius (Ed.).
25. Noland T.L., Mohammed G.H. Fluorescein diacetate as a viability stain for tree roots and seeds. New Forests 1997, 14(3):221-232.
26. 2-enrichment. Global Change Biology 2008, 14:1252-1264.
27. 2-enrichment (FACE): a six year minirhizotron study. Global Change Biology 2008, 14:588-602.
28. Qian X.M., Kottke I., Oberwinkler F. Activity of different ectomycorrhizal types studied by vital fluorescence. Plant and Soil 1998, 199:91-98.
29. Rotman B., Papermaster B.W. Membrane properties of living mammalian cells as studied by enzymatic hydrolysis of fluorogenic esters. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences 1966, 55:134-141.
30. Trappe J. Cenococcum graniforme - Its Distribution, Ecology, Mycorrhiza Formation and Inherent Variation 1962, (Doctoral dissertation), University of Washington.
31. 2 efflux under laboratory conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2011, 43:1350-1355.