Host preference, niches and fungal diversity

New Phytologist

Volumn 174, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 230-233

  Dickie, Ian A ^a  

^a LANDCARE RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Cenococcum geophilum; Ecological specificity; Realized niche; Species richness; Symbiosis

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; MYCORRHIZA; NOTE; PHYSIOLOGY; SYMBIOSIS;

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; MYCORRHIZAE; SYMBIOSIS;

CENOCOCCUM GEOPHILUM;

EID: 33947424729     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02055.x     Document Type: Note

References (26)

1. Bever JD. 2002. Negative feedback within a mutualism: Host-specific growth of mycorrhizal fungi reduces plant benefit. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 269: 2595-2601.
2. Bruns TD. 1995. Thoughts on the processes that maintain local species diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Plant and Soil 170: 63-73.
3. Cline ET, Ammirati JF, Edmonds RL. 2005. Does proximity to mature trees influence ectomycorrhizal fungus communities of Douglas-fir seedlings? New Phytologist 166: 993-1009.
4. Conn C, Dighton J. 2000. Litter quality influences on decomposition, ectomycorrhizal community structure and mycorrhizal root surface acid phosphatase activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32: 489-496.
5. Dickie IA, Reich PB. 2005. Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities at forest edges. Journal of Ecology 93: 244-255.
6. Dickie IA, Xu W, Koide RT. 2002. Vertical niche differentiation of ectomycorrhizal hyphae in soils as shown by T-RFLP analysis. New Phytologist 156: 527-535.
7. Gebhardt S, Neubert K, Wöllecke J, Münzenberger B, Hüttl RF. (in press). Ectomycorrhiza communities of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) of different age in the Lusatian lignite mining district, East Germany. Mycorrhiza.
8. Genney DR, Anderson IC, Alexander IJ. 2006. Fine-scale distribution of pine ectomycorrhizas and their extramatrical mycelium. New Phytologist 170: 381-390.
9. Hutchinson GE. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbour Symposium on Quantitative Biology 22: 415-427.
10. Ishida TA, Nara K, Hogetsu T. 2007. Host effects on ectomycorrhizal fungal communities: insight from eight host species in mixed conifer-broadleaf forests. New Phytologist 174: 430-440.
11. Izzo A, Agbowo J, Bruns TD. 2005. Detection of plot-level changes in ectomycorrhizal communities across years in an old-growth mixed conifer forest. New Phytologist 166: 619-630.
12. Kennedy PG, Bergemann SE, Hortal S, Bruns TD. 2006. Determining the outcome of field-based competition between two Rhizopogon species using real-time PCR. Molecular Ecology doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03191.x.
13. Kjøller R. 2006. Disproportionate abundance between ectomycorrhizal root tips and their associated mycelia. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 58: 214-224.
14. Koide RT, Shumway DS, Xu B, Sharda JN. 2007. On temporal partitioning of a community of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 174: 420-429.
15. Koide RT, Xu B, Sharda J. 2005. Contrasting below-ground views of an ectomycorrhizal fungal community. New Phytologist 166: 251-262.
16. Korkama T, Pakkanen A, Pennanen T. 2006. Ectomycorrhizal community structure varies among Norway spruce (Picea abies) clones. New Phytologist 171: 815-824.
17. Lekberg Y, Koide RT, Rohr JR, Aldrich-Wolfe L, Morton JB. 2007. Role of niche restrictions and dispersal in the composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Journal of Ecology 95: 95-105.
18. Luoma DL, Stockdale CA, Molina R, Eberhart JL. 2006. The spatial influence of Pseudotsuga menziesii retention trees on ectomycorrhizal diversity. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 2561-2573.
19. Molina R, Trappe J. 1982. Patterns of ectomycorrhizal host specificity and potential among Pacific Northwest conifers and fungi. Forest Science 28: 423-458.
20. Nara K. 2006. Pioneer dwarf willow may facilitate tree succession by providing late colonizers with compatible ectomycorrhizal fungi in a primary successional volcanic desert. New Phytologist 138: 619-627.
21. Saari SK, Campbell CD, Russell J, Alexander IJ, Anderson IC. 2005. Pine microsatellite markers allow roots and ectomycorrhizas to be linked to individual trees. New Phytologist 165: 295-304.
22. Tedersoo L, Suvi T, Larsson E, Kõljalg U. 2006. Diversity and community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a wooded meadow. Mycological Research 110: 734-748.
23. Toljander JF, Eberhardt U, Toljander YK, Paul LR, Taylor AFS. 2006. Species composition of an ectomycorrhizal fungal community along a local nutrient gradient in a boreal forest. New Phytologist 170: 873-884.
24. Walker JF, Miller OKJ, Horton JL. 2005. Hyperdiversity of ectomycorrhizal fungus assemblages on oak seedlings in mixed forests in the southern Appalachian mountains. Molecular Ecology 14: 829-838.
25. Wardle DA. 2006. The influence of biotic interactions on soil biodiversity. Ecology Letters 9: 870-886.
26. Wu B, Nara K, Hogetsu T. 1999. Competition between ectomycorrhizal fungi colonizing Pinus densiflora. Mycorrhiza 9: 151-159.