Nitroglycerin, nitroprusside, or both, in preventing radial artery spasm during transradial artery catheterization

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 155-158

  Coppola, John ^a   Patel, Tejas ^b   Kwan, Tak ^a   Sanghvi, Kintur ^a   Srivastava, Sudhesh ^a   Shah, Sanjay ^a   Staniloae, Cezar ^a  

^a ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Sterling Hospital Medical Center   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DILTIAZEM; GLYCERYL TRINITRATE; LIDOCAINE; NITRIC OXIDE DONOR; NITROPRUSSIDE SODIUM; VASODILATOR AGENT;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTERY SPASM; ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFICACY; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; PREDICTION; RADIAL ARTERY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SMOKING; VASODILATATION; CORONARY ARTERY SPASM; DRUG COMBINATION; DRUG EFFECT; INCIDENCE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; TREATMENT FAILURE;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY VASOSPASM; DRUG COMBINATIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NITRIC OXIDE DONORS; NITROGLYCERIN; NITROPRUSSIDE; RADIAL ARTERY; TREATMENT FAILURE; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 33745069059     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: 15572501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, et al. A Randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: The ACCESS study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1269-1275.
2. Philippe F, Larrazet F, Meziane T, Dibie A. Comparison of transradial vs. transfemoral approach in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction with primary angioplasty and abciximab. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;61:67-73.
3. Hildick-Smith DJR, Walsh JT, Lowe MD, et al. Transradial coronary angiography in patients with contraindications to the femoral approach: An analysis of 500 cases. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;61:60-66.
4. Kiemeneij F, Vajifdar BU, Eccleshall SC, et al. Evaluation of a spasmolytic cocktail to prevent radial artery spasm during coronary procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;58:281-284.
5. Fiho MA Jr, Assad JA, Zago AC, et al. Comparative study of the use of diltiazem as an antispasmodic drug in coronary angiography via the transradial approach. Arq Bras Cardiol 2003;81:54-63.
6. Shiny Abe, Meguro T, Endoh N, et al. Response of the radial artery to three vasodilatory agents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;49:253-356.
7. Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;16:3-7.
8. Caputo RP, Simons A, Giambartolomei A, et al. Transradial cardiac catheterization in elderly patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;51:287-290.
9. C-H Lee. Satisfaction and acceptance after transradial coronary intervention in elderly. Int J Angiology 2000;9:147-150.
10. Cooper CJ, El-Shiekh RA, Cohen DJ, et al. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: A randomized comparison. Am Heart J 1999;138:430-436.
11. Louvard Y, Lefèvre T, Allain A, Morice M. Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: The CARAFE study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;52:181-187.
12. Mann T, Cubeddu G, Bowen J, et al. Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: A comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:572-576.
13. Delarche N, Idir M, Estrad G, Leblay M. Direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients using transradial approach. Am J Geriatr Cardiol 1999;8:32-35.
14. Khatri S, Webb JG, Carere RG, et al. Safety and cost benefit of same-day discharge after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:425-427.
15. Fernandez JS, Calvino SR, Vazquez RJM, et al. Transradial approach to coronary angiography and angioplasty: Initial experience and learning curve. Rev Esp Cardiol 2003;56:152-159.
16. Hildick-Smith DJR, Walsh JT, Lowe MD, Petch MC. Coronary angiography in the fully anticoagulated patient: The transradial route is successful and safe. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;58:8-10.
17. Savchenko AP, Rudenko BA. Use of radial artery as an access during coronary angiography: Experience and further prospects. Westn Rentgenol Radiol 2000:23-26.
18. Saito S. Transradial approach from the evangelist's view. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;53:269-270.
19. Corrales JE. Radial artery access: Should it be used more often? Rev Esp Cardiol 2003;56:124-127.
20. Brinker JA. Radial is not radical, but is it practical? Confession of a nonuser. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;51:291-292.
21. Kiemeneij F, Bhavesh U, Vajifdar S, et al. Measurement of radial artery spasm using automatic pullback device. Catheter Cardiovas Interv 2001;54:437-441.