Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for transient tachypnea of newborn: A randomized, prospective study

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1099-1102

  Demirel, Gamze ^a   Uras, Nurdan ^b   Celik, Istemi Han ^c   Canpolat, Fuat Emre ^b   Dilmen, Ugur ^b,d  

^a Samsun Maternity and Child Health Hospital   (Turkey)

^b Zekai Tahir Burak Maternity Teaching Hospital   (Turkey)

^c Mersin Maternity and Child Health Hospital   (Turkey)

^d YILDIRIM BEYAZIT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure; Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation; Transient tachypnea of newborn

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSISTED VENTILATION; BIRTH WEIGHT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INFANT; INTERMITTENT MANDATORY VENTILATION; INTUBATION; MALE; NEONATAL RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; NEWBORN; OXYGEN SUPPLY; OXYGEN THERAPY; PNEUMONIA; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; TRANSIENT TACHYPNEA OF THE NEWBORN; TREATMENT DURATION;

ADULT; BIRTH WEIGHT; CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTERMITTENT POSITIVE-PRESSURE VENTILATION; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; PREGNANCY; TIME FACTORS; TRANSIENT TACHYPNEA OF THE NEWBORN; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84879357552     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.766707     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, Henriksen TB. Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective caesarean section: cohort study. BMJ 2008;336:85-7.
2. Guglani L, Lakshminrusimha S, Ryan RM. Transient tachypnea of the newborn. Pediatr Rev 2008;29:e59-65.
3. Baines DL, Folkesson HG, Norlin A, et al. The influence of mode of delivery, hormonal status and postnatal O2 environment on epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) expression in perinatal guinea-pig lung. J Physiol 2000;522:147-57. (Pubitemid 30052777)
4. Hummler E, Barker P, Beermann F, et al. Role of the epithelial sodium channel in lung liquid clearance. Chest 1997;111:113S. (Pubitemid 27258285)
5. Avery ME, Gatewood OB, Brumley G. Transient tachypnea of newborn. Possible delayed resorption of fluid at birth. Am J Dis Child 1966;111:380-5.
6. Miller LK, Calenoff L, Boehm JJ, Riedy MJ. Respiratory distress in the newborn. JAMA 1980;243:1176-9. (Pubitemid 10180031)
7. Hermansen CL, Lorah KN. Respiratory distress in the newborn. Am Fam Physician 2007;76:987-94. (Pubitemid 47585817)
8. Dumas De La Roque E, Bertrand C, Tandonnet O, et al. Nasal high frequency percussive ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in transient tachypnea of the newborn: a pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT00556738). Pediatr Pulmonol 2010; [Epub ahead of print].
9. Lin CH, Wang ST, Lin YJ, Yeh TF. Efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating apnea of prematurity. Pediatr Pulmonol 1998;26:349-53.
10. Rawlings JS, Smith FR. Transient tachypnea of the newborn. An analysis of neonatal and obstetric risk factors. Am J Dis Child 1984;138:869-71. (Pubitemid 14074546)
11. Morrison JJ, Rennie JM, Milton PJ. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102: 101-6.
12. Moretti C, Gizzi C, Papoff P, et al. Comparing the effects of nasal synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) after extubation in very low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev 1999;56:167-77.
13. Barrington KJ, Bull D, Finer NN. Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2001;107:638-41. (Pubitemid 32268444)
14. Khalaf MN, Brodsky N, Hurley J, Bhandari V. A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics 2001;108:13-17. (Pubitemid 32591999)
15. De Paoli AG, Davis PG, Lemyre B. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr 2003;92:70-5. (Pubitemid 36255935)
16. Friedlich P, Lecart C, Posen R, et al. A randomized trial of nasopharyngeal-synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in very low birth weight infants after extubation. J Perinatol 1999;19: 413-18.
17. Kiciman NM, Andreasson B, Bernstein G, et al. Thoracoabdominal motion in newborns during ventilation delivered by endotracheal tube or nasal prongs. Pediatr Pulmonol 1998;25:175-81. (Pubitemid 28163301)
18. Lavallee SL, Iwamoto LM, Claybaugh JR, et al. Furosemideinduced airway relaxation in guinea pigs: relation to Na-K-2Cl cotransporter function. Am J Physiol 1997;273:L211-16.
19. Lemyre B, Davis PG, de Paoli AG. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;1:CD002272.