Effects of forward model errors on EEG source localization

Brain Topography

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 378-396

  Akalin Acar, Zeynep ^a   Makeig, Scott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

BEM; Boundary element method; Co registration; EEG; Electrode number; Head modeling; MNI head model; Skull conductivity; Spherical head model; White matter

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN SIZE; CONDUCTANCE; DIPOLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMAN; NEUROIMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WHITE MATTER;

ANISOTROPY; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN WAVES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEAD; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL;

EID: 84879320517     PISSN: 08960267     EISSN: 15736792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-012-0274-6     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Akalin Acar Z, Gencer NG (2004) An advanced BEM implementation for the forward problem of electro-magnetic source imaging. Phys Med Biol 49(5):5011-5028
2. Akalin Acar Z, Makeig S (2010) Neuroelectromagnetic forward head modeling toolbox. J Neurosci Methods 190:258-270
3. Akalin Acar Z, Makeig S (2012) EEG cortical patch sources and equivalent dipole source localization. In: HBM 2012, New Orleans
4. Akalin Acar Z, Worrell G, Makeig S (2009) Patch based electrocortical source imaging in epilepsy. IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009:2930-2933
5. Ataseven Y, Akalin Acar Z, Acar CE, Gencer NG (2008) Parallel implementation of the accelerated BEM approach for EMSI of the human brain. Med Biol Eng Comput 46:671-679
6. Baillet S, Garnero L (1997) A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44(5):374-385
7. Baillet S, Mosher JC, Leahy RM (2001) Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 18(6):14-30
8. Baumann SD, Wozny DR, Kelly SK, Meno FM (1997) The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 3:220-223
9. Baysal U, Haueisen J (2004) Use of a priori information in estimating tissue resistivities: application to human data in vivo. Physiol Meas 25:737-748
10. Bookstein F (1999) Linear methods for nonlinear maps: procrustes fits, thin-plate splines, and the biometric analysis of shape variability. Brain warping. Academic Press, New York, pp 157-181
11. Brazier MAB (1949) A study of the electrical fields at the surface of the head. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 2:38-52
12. Bruno P, Vatta F, Mininel S, Inchingolo P (2003) Skull conductivity and extension of head volume conductor model: simulation of bioelectric phenomena. Proceedings of 25th annual international conference. IEEE EMBS, Cancun, Mexico
13. Buchner H, Waberski TD, Fuchs M, Wischmann H-A, Wagner M, Drenckhahn R (1995) Comparison of realistically shaped boundary-element and spherical head models in source localization of early somatosensory evoked potentials. Brain Topogr 2(8):137-143
14. Chauveau N, Franceries X, Doyon B, Rigaud B, Morucci JP, Celsis P (2004) Effects of skull thickness, anisotropy, and inhomogeneity on forward EEG/ERP computations using a spherical three-dimensional resistor mesh model. Hum Brain Mapp 21(2):86-97
15. Cohen D, Cuffin BN (1983) Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 56:38-51
16. Cohen D, Cuffin NB, Yunokuchi K, Maniewski R, Purcell C, Cosgrove RG, Ives J, Keneddy JG, Schomer LD (1990) MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain. Ann Neurol 28(6):811-817
17. Crouzeix A, Yvert B, Bertrand O, Pernier J (1999) An evaluation of dipole reconstruction accuracy with spherical and realistic head models in MEG. Clin Neurophysiol 110:2176-2188
18. Cuffin NB (1996) EEG Localization accuracy improvements using realistically shaped head models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44(3):299-303
19. Dannhauer M, Lanfer B, Wolters CH, Knosche TR (2011) Modeling of the human skull in EEG source analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 32(9):1383-1399
20. Darvas F, Ermer J, Mosher J, Leahy R (2006) Generic head models for atlas-based EEG source analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 27:129-143
21. de Munck J, Van Dijk BW, Spekreijse H (1988) Mathematical dipoles are adequate to describe realistic generators of human brain activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 35(11):960-966
22. Delorme A, Palmer J, Oostenveld R, Makeig S (2012) Independent EEG sources are dipolar. PLoS One 7(2):e30135
23. Ferree T, Eriksen K, Tucker D (2000) Regional head tissue conductivity estimation for improved EEG analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 47:1584-1592
24. Fiederer LDJ et al (2012) High-resolution forward modeling using finite element method head models based on 7T MRI data. In: HBM 2012
25. Gao N, Zhu SA, He B (2005) Estimation of electrical conductivity distribution within the human head from magnetic flux density measurement. Phys Med Biol 50:2675-2687
26. Geddes LA, Baker LE (1967) The specific resistance of biological materials: a compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist. Med Biol Eng 5:271-293
27. Gencer NG, Acar CE (2004) Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity. Phys Med Biol 49:701-717
28. Gullmar D, Haueisen J, Reichenbach JR (2010) Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study. Neuroimage 51:145-163
29. Gunduz A, Brunner P, Daitch A, Leuthardt EC, Ritaccio A, Pesaran B, Schalk G (2011) Neural correlates of visual-spatial attention in electrocorticographic signals in humans. Front Hum Neurosci 5:89
30. Gutierrez D, Nehorai A, Muravchik C (2004) Estimating brain conductivities and dipole source signals with EEG arrays. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51:2113-2122
31. Hallez H, Vanrumste B, Van Hese P, Delputte S, Lemahieu I (2008) Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis. Phys Med Biol 53:1877-1894
32. Haueisen J, Tuch DS, Ramon C, Schimpf PH, Wedeen VJ, George JS, Belliveau JW (2002) The influence of brain tissue anisotropy on human EEG and MEG. Neuroimage 15:159-166
33. Henderson CJ, Butler SR (1975) The localization of equivalent dipoles of EEG sources by the application of electrical field theory. Neurophysiology 39:117-130
34. Hoekema R, Wieneke GH, Leijten FSS, van Veelen CWM, van Rijen PC, Huiskamp GJM, Ansems J, van Huffelen AC (2003) Measurement of the conductivity of skull, temporarily removed during epilepsy surgery. Brain Topogr 16(1):29-38
35. Huang M-X, Song T, Hagler DJ, Podgorny I, Jousmaki V, Cui L, Gaa K, Harrington DL, Dale AM, Lee RR, Elman J, Halgren E (2007) A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources. Neuroimage 37:731-748
36. Kaipio J, Somersalo E (2007) Statistical inverse problems: discretization, model reduction and inverse crimes. J Comput Appl Math 198:493-504
37. Khosla D, Don M, Kwong B (1999) Spatial mislocalization of EEG electrodes: effects on accuracy of dipole estimation. Clin Neurophysiol 110:261-271
38. Kobayashi K, Yoshinaga H, Oka M, Ohtsuka Y, Gotman J (2003) A simulation study of the error in dipole source localization for EEG spikes with a realistic head model. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1069-1078
39. Lai Y, van Drongelen W, Ding L, Hecox KE, Towle VL, Frim DM, He B (2005) Estimation of in vivo human brain-to-skull conductivity ratio from simultaneous extra- and intra-cranial electrical potential recordings. Clin Neurophysiol 116:456-465
40. Lanfer B, Scherg M, Dannhauer M, Knosche TR, Burger M, Wolters CH (2012) Influences of skull segmentation inaccuracies on EEG source analysis. Neuroimage 62:418-431
41. Lew S, Wolters CH, Anwander A, Makeig S, MacLeod RS (2009) Improved EEG source analysis using low-resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model. Hum Brain Mapp 30:2862-2878
42. Lucka F, Pursiainen S, Burger M, Wolters CH (2012) Hierarchical Bayesian inference for the EEG inverse problem using realistic FE head models: depth localization and source separation for focal primary currents. Neuroimage 61:1364-1382
43. Lutkenhoner B, Menninghaus E, Steinstroter O, Wienbruch C, Gilbler HM, Elbert T (1995) Neuromagnetic source analysis using magnetic resonance images for the construction of source and volume conductor model. Brain Topogr 7(4):291-299
44. Makeig S, Debener S, Onton J, Delorme A (2004) Mining event-related brain dynamics. Trends Cognitive Sci 8(5):204-210
45. Marin G, Guerin C, Baillet S, Garnero L, Meunier G (1998) Influence of skull anisotropy for the forward and inverse problem in EEG: simulation studies using FEM on realistic head models. Hum Brain Mapp 6(4):250-269
46. Meijs J, Weier O, Peters MJ, Van Oosterom A (1989) On the numerical accuracy of the boundary element method. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 36:1038-1049
47. Michel CM, Murray MM, Lantz GL, Gonzalez S, Spinelli L, de Peralta RG (2004) EEG source imaging. Clin Neurophysiol 115:2195-2222
48. Mosher JC, Spencer ME, Leahy RM, Lewis PS (1993) Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 86:303-321
49. Oostendorp TF, Delbeke J, Stegeman DF (2000) The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 47:1487-1492
50. Plummer C, Harvey MC, Cook M (2008) EEG source localization in focal epilepsy: where are we now? Epilepsia 49(2):201-219
51. Ramon C, Schimpf P, Haueisen J (2006) Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations. Biomed Eng Online 5:10
52. Roth BJ, Balish M, Gorbach A, Sato S (1993) How well does a three-sphere model predict positions of dipoles in a realistically shaped head? Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 87:175-184
53. Rush S, Driscoll DA (1968) Current distribution in the brain from the surface electrodes. Anesth Analg 47:717-723
54. Russell GS, Eriksen KJ, Poolman P, Luu P, Tucker DM (2005) Geodesic photogrammetry for localizing sensor positions in dense-array EEG. Clin Neurophysiol 116(5):1130-1140
55. Sadleir RJ, Argibay A (2007) Modeling skull electrical properties. Ann Biomed Eng 35(10):1699-1712
56. Schneider M (1974) Effect of inhomogeneities on surface signals coming from a cerebral current dipole source. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 21(1):52-54
57. Shaw JC, Roth M (1955) Potential distribution analysis II: a theoretical consideration of its significance in terms of electrical field theory. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 7:285-292
58. Ulker Karbeyaz B, Gencer NG (2003) Electrical conductivity imaging via contactless measurements: an experimental study. IEEE Trans Med Imag 22:627-635
59. Valdes-Hernandez PA, von Ellenrieder N, Ojeda-Gonzales A, Kochen S, Aleman-Gomez Y, Muravchik C, Valdes-Sosa PA (2009) Approximate average head models for EEG source imaging. J Neurosci Methods 185:125-132
60. Van Uitert R, Johnson C, Zhukov L (2004) Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51:2129-2137
61. Vanrumste B, Van Hoey G, Van de Walle R, D'Havé M, Lemahieu I, Boon P (2000) Dipole location errors in electroencephalogram source analysis due to volume conductor model errors. Med Biol Eng Comput 38(5):528-534
62. Vatta F, Meneghini F, Esposito F, Mininel S, Di Salle F (2010) Realistic and spherical head modeling for EEG forward problem solution: a comparative cortex-based analysis. Comput Intell Neurosci. doi: 10.1155/2010/972060
63. Wang Y, Gotman J (2001) The influence of electrode location errors on EEG dipole source localization with a realistic head model. Clin Neurophysiol 112:1777-1780
64. Weinberg H, Brickett P, Coolsma F, Baff M (1986) Magnetic localization of intracranial dipoles: simulation with a physical model. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 64:159-170
65. Wendel K, Narra NG, Hannula M, Kauppinen P, Malmivuo J (2008) The influence of CSF on EEG sensitivity distributions of multilayered head models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(4):1454-1456
66. Wolters CH, Kuhn M, Anwander A, Reitzinger S (2002) A parallel algebraic multigrid solver for finite element method based source localization in the human brain. Comput Visual Sci 5:165-177
67. Wolters CH, Anwander A, Tricoche X, Weinstein D, Koch MA, MacLeod RS (2006) Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling. Neuroimage 30:813-826
68. Yvert B, Bertrand O, Thevenet M, Echallier JF, Pernier J (1997) A systematic evaluation of the spherical model accuracy in EEG dipole localization. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 102:352-459
69. Zhang Z, Jewett D (1993) Insidious errors in dipole localization parameters at a single time-point due to model misspecification of number of shells. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 88:1-11
70. Zhang Z, Jewett D, Goodwill G (1994) Insidious errors in dipole parameters due to shell model misspecification using multiple time points. Brain Topogr 6:283-298