New fractionation for a better bioaccessibility description of particulate organic matter in a modified ADM1 model

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 228, Issue , 2013, Pages 871-881

  Mottet, A ^a   Ramirez, I ^a   Carrere H ^a   Deleris S ^b   Vedrenne, F ^b   Jimenez, J ^b   Steyer, J P ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE DE BIOTECHNOLOGIE DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

^b Veolia Environnement Recherche et Innovation   (France)

Author keywords

ADM1; Anaerobic digestion; Hydrolysis kinetic; Modeling; Waste activated sludge

Indexed keywords

ADM1; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION MODEL; BIOMASS CONCENTRATIONS; HYDROLYSIS KINETICS; PARTICULATE ORGANIC MATTERS; THERMAL PRE-TREATMENT; THERMOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGES;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; HYDROLYSIS; KINETIC PARAMETERS; METHANE; MODELS; SURFACE REACTIONS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

EID: 84879305775     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.082     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Nielsen P.H., Thomsen T.R., Nielsen J.L. Bacterial composition of activated sludge-importance for floc and sludge properties. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 49(10):51-58.
2. Jorand F., Zartarian F., Thomas F., Block J.C.C., Bottero J.Y.Y., Villemin G., et al. Chemical and structural (2D) linkage between bacteria within activated sludge flocs. Water Res. 1995, 29(7):1639-1647.
3. Appels L., Baeyens J., Degre J., Dewil R. Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2008, 34:755-781.
4. Carrère H., Dumas C., Battimelli A., Batstone D.J., Delgenès J.P., Steyer J.P., et al. Pretreatment methods to improve sludge anaerobic degradability: a review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 183(1-3):1-15.
5. Aldin S., Elbeshbishy E., Nakhla G., Ray M.B. Modeling the effect of sonication on the anaerobic digestion of biosolids. Energy Fuels 2010, 24(9):4703-4711.
6. Beszédes S., László Z., Szabó G., Hodúr C. Effects of microwave pretreatments on the anaerobic digestion of food industrial sewage sludge. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2011, 30(3):486-492.
7. Erden G., Filibeli A. Ozone oxidation of biological sludge: effects on disintegration, anaerobic biodegradability, and filterability. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2011, 30(3):377-383.
8. Qiao W., Yan X., Ye J., Sun Y., Wang W., Zhang Z. Evaluation of biogas production from different biomass wastes with/without hydrothermal pretreatment. Renew. Energy 2011, 36(12):3313-3318.
9. Siegrist H., Vogt D., Garcia-Heras J.L., Gujer W. Mathematical model for meso- and thermophilic anaerobic sewage sludge digestion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36(5):1113-1123.
10. Tomei M.C., Braguglia C.M., Cento G., Mininni G. Modeling of anaerobic digestion of sludge. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 39(12):1003-1051.
11. Batstone D.J., Keller J., Angelidaki I., Kalyuzhnyi S.V., Pavlostathis S.G., Rozzi A., et al. Anaerobic Digestion Model No.1 (ADM1) (Scientific & Technical Report) 2002, IWA Publishing, No. 13, International Water Association, London, UK.
12. Myint M., Nirmalakhandan N. Evaluation of first-order, second-order, and surface-limiting reactions in anaerobic hydrolysis of cattle manure. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2006, 23(6):970-980.
13. Yasui H., Sugimoto M., Komatsu K., Goel R., Li Y.Y., Noike T. An approach for substrate mapping between ASM and ADM1 for sludge digestion. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 54(4):83-92.
14. Yasui H., Goel R., Li Y.Y., Noike T. Modified ADM1 structure for modelling municipal primary sludge hydrolysis. Water Res. 2008, 42(1-2):249-259.
15. Fenu A., Guglielmi G., Jimenez J., Spèrandio M., Saroj D., Lesjean B., et al. Activated sludge model (ASM) based modelling of membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes: a critical review with special regard to MBR specificities. Water Res. 2010, 44(15):4272-4294.
16. Spérandio M., Labelle M.-A., Ramdani A., Paul E., Comeau Y., Dold P. Modelling the degradation of endogenous residue and "unbiodegradable" influent organic suspended solids to predict sludge production, in: 3rd IWA/WEF, Wasterwater Treatment Modelling Seminar 2012, Québec, Canada.
17. Menniti A., Rieger L., Boltz J., Johnson B., Daigger G., Habermacher J., et al. Critical review on modeling of endogenous processes and the degradability of endogenous decay products, in: 3rd IWA/WEF, Wasterwater Treatment Modelling Seminar 2012, Québec, Canada.
18. Eastman J.A., Ferguson J.F. Solubilization of particulate organic carbon during the acid phase of anaerobic digestion. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1981, 53(3).
19. Pavlostathis S.G., Gossett J.M. A kinetic model for anaerobic digestion of biological sludge. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1986, 28(10):1519-1530.
20. Shimizu T., Kudo K., Nasu Y. Anaerobic waste-activated sludge digestion-a bioconversion mechanism and kinetic model. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1993, 41(11):1082-1091.
21. Angelidaki I., Ellegaard L., Ahring B. A comprehensive model of anaerobic bioconversion of complex substrates to biogas. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1999, 63(3):363-372.
22. Rotter B.E., Barry D.A., Gerhard J.I., Small J.S. Parameter and process significance in mechanistic modeling of cellulose hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99(13):5738-5748.
23. Vavilin V.A., Fernandez B., Palatsi J., Flotats X. Hydrolysis kinetics in anaerobic degradation of particulate organic material: an overview. Waste Manage. (Oxford) 2008, 28(6):939-951.
24. Gujer W., Henze M., Mino T., Matsuo T., Wentzel M., Marais G. The activated sludge model no. 2: biological phosphorus removal. Water Sci. Technol. 1995, 31(2):1-11.
25. Contois D.E. Kinetics of bacterial growth: relationship between population density and specific growth rate of continuous cultures. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1959, 21(1):40-50.
26. Chen Y.R., Hashimoto A.G. Substrate utilization kinetic model for biological treatment process. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1980, 22(10):2081-2095.
27. von Münch E., Keller J., Lant P., Newell R. Mathematical modelling of prefermenters-I. Model development and verification. Water Res. 1999, 33(12):2757-2768.
28. Vavilin V.A., Rytov S.V., Lokshina L.Y. A description of hydrolysis kinetics in anaerobic degradation of particulate organic matter. Bioresour. Technol. 1996, 56(2):9.
29. Tomei M.C., Braguglia C.M., Mininni G. Anaerobic degradation kinetics of particulate organic matter in untreated and sonicated sewage sludge: role of the inoculum. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99(14):6119-6126.
30. Batstone D.J., Tait S., Starrenburg D. Estimation of hydrolysis parameters in full-scale anerobic digesters. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 102(5):1513-1520.
31. Mottet A., Steyer J.P., Déléris S., Vedrenne F., Chauzy J., Carrère H. Kinetics of thermophilic batch anaerobic digestion of thermal hydrolysed waste activated sludge. Biochem. Eng. J. 2009, 46(2):169-175.
32. Lowry O.H., Rosebrough N.J., Farr A.L., Randall R.J. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193(1):265-275.
33. Dreywood R. Qualitative test for carbohydrate material. Ind. Eng. Chem. Anal. Ed. 1946, 18(8):499.
34. Bougrier C., Delgenès J.P., Carrère H. Effects of thermal treatments on five different waste activated sludge samples solubilisation, physical properties and anaerobic digestion. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 139(2):236-244.
35. Bougrier C., Albasi C., Delgenès J.P., Carrère H. Effect of ultrasonic, thermal and ozone pre-treatments on waste activated sludge solubilisation and anaerobic biodegradability. Chem. Eng. Process. 2006, 45(8):711-718.
36. Ramirez I., Mottet A., Carrère H., Déléris S., Vedrenne F., Steyer J.-P. Modified ADM1 disintegration/hydrolysis structures for modeling batch thermophilic anaerobic digestion of thermally pretreated waste activated sludge. Water Res. 2009, 43(14):3479-3492.
37. Kim H.-W., Nam J.-Y., Kang S.-T., Kim D.-H., Jung K.-W., Shin H.-S. Hydrolytic activities of extracellular enzymes in thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic sequencing-batch reactors treating organic fractions of municipal solid wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 110:130-134.
38. C. Rosen, U. Jeppsson, Anaerobic COST benchmark model description, version 1.2, in: Tech. Report, Dept of Industrial Electrical Engineering and Automation (IEA), Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2002.
39. Girault R., Bridoux G., Nauleau F., Poullain C., Buffet J., Steyer J.-P., et al. A waste characterisation procedure for ADM1 implementation based on degradation kinetics. Water Res. 2012, 46(13):4099-4110.
40. Blumensaat F., Keller J. Modelling of two-stage anaerobic digestion using the IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1). Water Res. 2005, 39(1):171-183.
41. Donoso-Bravo A., Mailier J., Martin C., Rodríguez J., Aceves-Lara C.A., Vande Wouwer A. Model selection, identification and validation in anaerobic digestion: a review. Water Res. 2011, 45(17):5347-5364.
42. Batstone D.J., Keller J., Blackall L.L. The influence of substrate kinetics on the microbial community structure in granular anaerobic biomass. Water Res. 2004, 38(6):1390-1404.
43. Batstone D.J., Keller J., Angelidaki I., Kalyuzhnyi S.V., Pavlostathis S.G., Rozzi A., et al. The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1). Water Sci. Technol.: J. Int. Assoc. Water Pollut. Res. 2002, 45:65-73.
44. Pavlostathis S.G., Giraldo-Gomez E. Kinetics of anaerobic treatment: a critical review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Control 1991, 21(5-6):411-490.
45. Lesteur M., Latrille E., Maurel V.B., Roger J.M., Gonzalez C., Junqua G., et al. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102(3):2280-2288.
46. Muller M., Milori D.M.B.P., Déléris S., Steyer J.-P., Dudal Y. Solid-phase fluorescence spectroscopy to characterize organic wastes. Waste Manage. (New York, NY) 2011, 31(9-10):1916-1923.
47. Martínez E.J., Fierro J., Sánchez M.E., Gómez X. Anaerobic co-digestion of FOG and sewage sludge: study of the process by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2012, 75:1-6.
48. Wan S., Xi B., Xia X., Li M., Lv D., Wang L., et al. Using fluorescence excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy to monitor the conversion of organic matter during anaerobic co-digestion of cattle dung and duck manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2012.