Vertical dome division: A quality-of-life outcome study

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

Volumn 148, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 758-763

  Lavinsky Wolff, Michelle ^a,b   Lutaif Dolci, Jose Eduardo ^c   Camargo, Humberto Lopes ^d   Manzini, Michelle ^b   Petersen, Sara ^a   Romanczuk, Sabrina ^a   Pizzoni, Rodrigo ^a   Polanczyk, Carisi Anne ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b HOSPITAL DE CLÍNICAS DE PORTO ALEGRE   (Brazil)

^c Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Neuromodulation   (Brazil)

^d Santa Casa Complexo Hospitalar   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Quality of life; Rhinoplasty; Vertical dome division.

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CASE STUDY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; NASAL OBSTRUCTION SYMPTOM EVALUATION; NOSE OBSTRUCTION; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; NOSE SEPTUM RECONSTRUCTION; OSTEOTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX; QUESTIONNAIRE; RHINOPLASTY OUTCOME EVALUATION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NOSE SEPTUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NASAL SEPTUM; QUALITY OF LIFE; RHINOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84879301225     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: 10976817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0194599813480629     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Daniel RK. The nasal tip: anatomy and aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89:216-224.
2. Patrocinio LG, Patrocinio TG, Maniglia JV, Patrocinio JA. Graduated approach to refinement of the nasal lobule. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11:221-229.
3. Goldman IB. The importance of the mesial crura in nasal-tip reconstruction. AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1957;65:143-147.
4. Lipsett EM. A new approach surgery of the lower cartilaginous vault. AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1959;70:42-47.
5. Simons RL, Greene RM. Rhinoplasty5 pearls: value of the endonasal approach and vertical dome division. Clin Plast Surg. 2010;37:265-283.
6. Chang CW, Simons RL. Hockey-stick vertical dome division technique for overprojected and broad nasal tips. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008;10:88-92.
7. Adamson PA, McGraw-Wall BL, Morrow TA, Constantinides MS. Vertical dome division in open rhinoplasty: an update on indications, techniques, and results. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:373-380.
8. Davis AM, Simons RL, Rhee JS. Evaluation of the Goldman tip procedure in modern-day rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6:301-307.
9. Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF Jr, Anderson S, Murakami CS, Johnson CM Jr. Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;3: 198-201.
10. Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:157-163.
11. Bezerra TF, Padua FG, Pilan RR, Stewart MG, Voegels RL. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a quality of life questionnaire: the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation questionnaire. Rhinology. 2011;49:227-231.
12. Meningaud JP, Lantieri L, Bertrand JC. Rhinoplasty: an outcome research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:251-257.
13. Stewart MG, Smith TL, Weaver EM, et al. Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 130:283-290.
14. Most SP. Analysis of outcomes after functional rhinoplasty using a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006;8:306-309.
15. Yoo S, Most SP. Nasal airway preservation using the autospreader technique: analysis of outcomes using a diseasespecific quality-of-life instrument. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011;13:231-233.
16. Salari B, Totonchi JS. Evaluation of the Goldman tip procedure and suture technique in tip rhinoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:467-471.
17. Arima LM, Velasco LC, Tiago RS. Crooked nose: outcome evaluations in rhinoplasty. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77: 510-515.
18. Hellings PW, Nolst Trenite GJ. Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:985-989.
19. Gillman GS, Simons RL, Lee DJ. Nasal tip bossae in rhinoplasty: etiology, predisposing factors, and management techniques. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999;1:83-89.
20. Cho GS, Kim JH, Yeo NK, Kim SH, Jang YJ. Nasal skin thickness measured using computed tomography and its effect on tip surgery outcomes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 144:522-527.