Target inference from collections of genomic intervals

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 25, 2013, Pages

  Krasnitz, Alexander ^a   Sun, Guoli ^a   Andrews, Peter ^a   Wigler, Michael ^a  

^a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cold Spring Harbor   (United States)

Author keywords

Genome analysis; Interval data; Statistical inference

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER GENETICS; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CORE OF RECURRENT EVENT; GENE DOSAGE; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GENOMIC INTERVAL; HUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

GENOME ANALYSIS; INTERVAL DATA; STATISTICAL INFERENCE;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, GENETIC; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, NEOPLASTIC; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; SOFTWARE; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84879288827     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1306909110     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Hicks J, et al. (2006) Novel patterns of genome rearrangement and their association with survival in breast cancer. Genome Res 16(12):1465-1479.
2. Navin N, et al. (2011) Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing. Nature 472(7341):90-94.
3. Hassin R, Tamir A (1991) Improved complexity-bounds for location-problems on the real line. Oper Res Lett 10(7):395-402.
4. Russnes HG, et al. (2010) Genomic architecture characterizes tumor progression paths and fate in breast cancer patients. Sci Transl Med 2(38):38ra47.
5. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5-32.
6. Sebat J, et al. (2007) Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with autism. Science 316(5823):445-449.
7. Venkatraman ES, Olshen AB (2007) A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data. Bioinformatics 23(6):657-663.
8. Beroukhim R, et al. (2011) GISTIC2.0 facilitates sensitive and confident localization of the targets of focal somatic copy-number alteration in human cancers. Genome Biol 12(4):R41.
9. Xue W, et al. (2008) DLC1 is a chromosome 8p tumor suppressor whose loss promotes hepatocellular carcinoma. Genes Dev 22(11):1439-1444.
10. Floer M, et al. (2010) A RSC/nucleosome complex determines chromatin architecture and facilitates activator binding. Cell 141(3):407-418.
11. Xue W, et al. (2012) A cluster of cooperating tumor-suppressor gene candidates in chromosomal deletions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(21):8212-8217.
12. Beroukhim R, et al. (2007) Assessing the significance of chromosomal aberrations in cancer: Methodology and application to glioma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(50):20007-20012.
13. Diskin SJ, et al. (2006) STAC: A method for testing the significance of DNA copy number aberrations across multiple array-CGH experiments. Genome Res 16(9):1149-1158.
14. Ionita I, Daruwala RS, Mishra B (2006) Mapping tumor-suppressor genes with multipoint statistics from copy-number-variation data. Am J Hum Genet 79(1):13-22. SF51)