In vitro and in silico study of intracranial stent treatments for cerebral aneurysms: Effects on perforating vessel flows

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 354-360

  Roszelle, Breigh Nonte ^a   Haithem Babiker, M ^a   Hafner, Walter ^a   Fernando Gonzalez, L ^b   Albuquerque, Felipe C ^c   Frakes, David H ^a  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

^b THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BARROW NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; BLOOD VESSEL PERFORATION; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM; BRAIN PERFUSION; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; INTRACRANIAL STENT; PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENT; TELESCOPE;

BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; HUMANS; HYDRODYNAMICS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; RHEOLOGY; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84879205683     PISSN: 17598478     EISSN: 17598486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010322     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Rinkel G, Djibuti M, Algra A, et al. Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms a systematic review. Stroke 1998;29:251-256.
2. Mayberg M, Batjer H, Dacey R, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Circulation 1994;90:2592-2605.
3. Higashida RT, Lahue BJ, Torbey MT, et al. Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a nationwide assessment of effectiveness. Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:146-151.
4. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267-274.
5. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Yu L, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurological clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysms occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809-817.
6. Murayama Y, Nien Y, Duckwiler G, et al. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience. J Neurosurg 2003;98: 959-966.
7. Benitez RP, Silva MT, Klem J, et al. Endovascular occlusion of wide-necked aneurysms with a new intracranial microstent (Neuroform) and detachable coils. Neurosurgery 2004;54:1359-368.
8. Kim M, Taulbee DB, Tremmel M, et al. Comparison of two stents in modifying cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:726-741.
9. Lieber BB, Stancampiano AP, Wakhloo AW. Alteration of hemodynamics in aneurysm models by stenting: influence of stent porosity. Ann Biomed Eng 1997;25:460-469.
10. Lopes DK, Ringer AJ, Boulos AS, et al. Fate of branch arteries after intracranial stenting. Neurosurgery 2003;52:1275-1279.
11. Wakhloo AK, Giuseppe L, Lieber BB, et al. Stents for intracranial aneurysms: the beginning of a new endovascular era? Neurosurgery 1998;43:377-379.
12. Levy EI, Chaturvedi S. Perforator stroke following intracranial stenting: a sacrifice for the greater good? Neurology 2006;66:1803-1804.
13. Armoiry X, Paysant M, Hartmann D, et al. Interest of flow diversion prostheses in the management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Int J Vasc Med 2012;2012:1-5. doi:10.1155/2012/654627.
14. Canton G, Levy DI, Lasheras JC. Hemodynamic changes due to stent placement in bifurcating intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2005;103:146-155.
15. Canton G, Levy DI, Lasheras JC, et al. Flow changes caused by the sequential placement of stents across the neck of sidewall cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2005;103:891-902.
16. Kim M, Levy EI, Meng H, et al. Quantification of hemodynamic changes induced by virtual placement of multiple stents across a wide-necked basilar trunk aneurysm. Neurosurgery 2007;61:1305-1313.
17. Jou L, Mohamed A, Lee D, et al. 3D Rotational digital subtraction angiography may underestimate intracranial aneurysms: findings from two basilar aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1690-1692.
18. Babiker MH, Gonzalez LF, Albuquerque F, et al. Quantitative effects of coil packing density on cerebral aneurysm fluid dynamics: an in vitro steady flow study. Ann Biomed Eng 2010;38:2293-2301.
19. Fiorella D, Lylyk P, Szikora I, et al. Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline emblization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. J NeuroIntervent Surg 2009;1:56-65.
20. Seong J, Wakhloo AK, Lieber BB. In vitro evaluation of flow diverters in an elastase-induced saccular aneurysm model in rabbit. J Biomech Eng 2007;129:863-872.
21. Wakhloo AK, Tio FO, Lieber BB, et al. Self-expanding nitinol stents in canine vertebral arteries: hemodynamics and tissue response. AJNR 1995;16:1043-1051.
22. Faik I, Mongrain R, Leask R, et al. Time-dependent 3D simulations of the hemodynamics in a stented coronary artery. Biomed Mater 2007;2:S28-S37.
23. He Y, Duraiswamy N, Frank AO, et al. Blood flow in stented arteries: a parametric comparison of strut design patterns in three dimensions. J Biomech Eng 2005;127:637-647.
24. Seo T, Schachter LG, Barakat AI. Computational study of fluid mechanical disturbance induced by endovascular stents. Ann Biomed Eng 2005;33:444-456.