Articulating Scientific Practice with PROTEE: STS, Loyalties, and the Limits of Reflexivity

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 470-491

  Valve, Helena ^a   McNally, Ruth ^b  

^a FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

articulation; GM trees; PROTEE; reflexivity; scientific practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879169757     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: 15528251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0162243912451340     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bonneuil C.,Joly P.-B.,Marris C."Disentrenching Experiment: The Construction of Gm-Crop Field Trials as a Social Problem.".Science Technology Human Values. 2008;33 (2): 201-29.
2. Braun K.,Kropp C."Beyond Speaking Truth? Institutional Responses to Uncertainty in Scientific Governance.".Science Technology and Human Values. 2010;35 (6): 771-82.
3. Callon M."The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge.".Science, Technology, & Society. 1999;4 (1): 81-94.
4. Callon M."An Essay On The Growing Contribution Of Economic Markets To The Proliferation Of The Social.".Theory, Culture & Society. 2007;24 (7-8): 139-63.
5. Callon M.,Lascoumes P.,Barthe Y.Acting in an Uncertain World. An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2009:.
6. Duret M.,Martin S.,Latour B.,Bischof H.,Reyse S.,Sondermann K.,Orobengoa A.,Bijker W.,Hommels A.,Peters P.,Laredo P.,Woolgar S.,McNally R.,Janssens de Bisthoven O.PROTEE: Procedures dans les transportes d'evaluation et de suivi des innovations considereees comme des experimentations collectives. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission; 2000:.
7. Fischer F.Citizens, Experts, and the Environment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2000:.
8. Funtowicz S. O.,Ravetz J. R.Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. Costanza R., ed. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1991:137-52.
9. Gibbons M.,Limoges C.,Nowotny H.,Schwartzman S.,Scott P.,Trow M.The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage; 1994:.
10. Hommels A.,Peters P.,Bijker W."Techno Therapy or Nurtured Niches? Technology Studies and the Evaluation of Radical Innovations.".Research Policy. 2007;36: 1088-99.
11. Horlick-Jones T.,Walls J.,Rowe G.,Pidgeon N.,Poortinga W.,Murdock G.,O'Riordan T.The GM Debate: Risk, Politics and Public Engagement. London: Routledge; 2007:.
12. Höyssä M.,Hyysalo S."The Fog of Innovation: Innovativeness and Deviance in Developing New Clinical Testing Equipment.".Research Policy. 2009;38 (6): 984-93.
13. Irwin A."The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the 'New' Scientific Governance.".Social Studies of Science. 2006;36 (2): 299-320.
14. Irwin A.,Wynne B.Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996:.
15. JolivetE.MourikR. M.RavenR. P. J. M.FeenstraC. F. J.Alcantud TorrentA.HeiskanenE.HodsonM.BrohmannB.Oniszk-PoplawskaA.DiFioriM.FritscheU. R.FucskoJ.HueneckeK.PotiB.PrasadG.SchaefferB.MaackM. 2008. General Manual for the Application of the ESTEEM Tool: Create Acceptance. Accessed January 30, 2012. http://www.esteem-tool.eu/fileadmin/esteem-tool/docs/ESTEEMmanual.pdf.
16. Laredo P.Learning from Real-time Case Studies. A Synthesis of Lessons for the PROTEE Instrument. PROTEE Final Report. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission; 1999:.
17. LaredoP.JolivetE.ShoveE.RamanS.RipA.MoorsE.PotiB.SchaefferG. J.PenanH.GarciaC. E. 2002. SOCROBUST Final Report. Paris, France: CSI/Armines. Accessed March 21, 2011. http://www.createacceptance.net/fileadmin/create-acceptance/user/docs/Socrobust_final_report.pdf.
18. Latour B.A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. Law J., ed. London: Routledge; 1991:103-32.
19. Latour B.Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1999:.
20. Latour B."How to Talk about the Body? The Normative Dimensions of Science Studies.".Body and Society. 2004a;10 (2-3): 205-29.
21. Latour B.Politics of Nature. How to Bring Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2004b:.
22. Latour B.Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2005:.
23. Law J.After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London and New York: Routledge; 2004:.
24. Law J.The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Turner B. S., ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009:.
25. Lengwiler M."Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology: Historical Origins and Current Practices in Critical Perspective.".Science Technology Human Values. 2008;33 (2): 186-200.
26. Levidow L.,Carr S."GM Crops on Trial: Technological Development as a Real-world Experiment.".Futures. 2007;29 (4): 408-31.
27. McNally R.,Sondermann U.PROTEE as Socio-techno Therapy: Case Study on the Krupp Fast Handling System. 1999:.
28. McNally R.,Woolgar S.Learning from the Retrospective Case Studies: A Synthesis of Lessons for the PROTEE Instrument PROTEE Final Report. 1999:.
29. Mol A.The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham and London: Duke University Press; 2002:.
30. Pasonen H.-L.,Vihervuori L.,Seppänen S-K.,Lyytikäinen-Saarenmaa P.,Ylioja T.,von Weissenberg K.,Pappinen A."Field Performance of Chitinase Transgenic Silver Birch (Betula pendula Roth): Growth and Adaptive Traits.".Trees-Structure and Function. 2008;22 (2): 413-21.
31. Pielke R. A.The Honest Broker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
32. Sarewitz D."How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse.".Environmental Science and Policy. 2004;7 (5): 358-403.
33. Shapin S.,Schaeffer S.Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1985:.
34. Stengers I.The Invention of Modern Science. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press; 2000:.
35. Turnpenny J.,Jones M.,Lorenzoni I."Where now for Post-normal Science? A Critical Review of its Development, Definitions and Uses.".Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2011;36 (3): 287-306.
36. Valve H."GM Trees on Trial in a Field: Reductionism, Risks and Intractable Biological Objects.".Geoforum. 2011;42 (2): 222-230.
37. Valve H."Qualified for Evaluation? A GM Potato and the Orders of Rural Worth.".Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 2012;25 (3): 315-331.
38. Valve H.,Kauppila J."Enacting Closure in the Environmental Control of Genetically Modified Organisms.".Journal of Environmental Law. 2008;20 (3): 339-62.
39. Valve H.,McNally R.,Pappinen A."Doing Research, Creating Impact: Using "PROTEE" to Learn from a GM tree Field Trial.".Science and Public Policy. 2010;37 (5): 369 79.
40. Von Weissenberg K.,Pappinen A.,Rikkinen J.,Koivisto R."Interbiontic Processes between Modified Trees, Forest Pests and Fungi. Development of Risk Assessment Procedure.". 2001;:.
41. Wynne B."Reflexing Complexity: Post-genomic Knowledge and Reductionist Returns in Public Science.".Theory, Culture and Society. 2005;22 (5): 67-94.
42. Wynne B."Dazzled by the Mirage of Influence? STS-SSK in Multivalent Registers of Relevance.".Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2007;32 (4): 491-503.