Hyperelastic Material Properties of Mouse Skin under Compression

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2013, Pages

  Wang, Yuxiang ^a   Marshall, Kara L ^b   Baba, Yoshichika ^b   Gerling, Gregory J ^a   Lumpkin, Ellen A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; COMPRESSION; CUTANEOUS PARAMETERS; FEMALE; HAIR GROWTH; HINDLIMB; MATURITY; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOUSE; NOCICEPTION; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SKIN BLOOD VESSEL; SKIN FUNCTION; SKIN INJURY; SKIN NERVE; SKIN STIFFNESS; SKIN STIMULATION; SKIN STRUCTURE; SKIN TENSION; SKINFOLD THICKNESS; TISSUE SECTION; TOUCH; YOUNG MODULUS; ANIMAL; ELASTICITY; FUNCTIONS OF THE SKIN AND ITS APPENDAGES;

ANIMALIA; MUS; MUS MUSCULUS;

ANIMALS; ELASTICITY; MICE; SKIN PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA;

EID: 84879163140     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067439     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Zaidi Z, Lanigan S (2010) Skin: structure and function. Dermatology in Clinical Practice: 1-15.
2. Wu JZ, Dong RG, Smutz WP, Schopper AW, (2003) Nonlinear and viscoelastic characteristics of skin under compression: experiment and analysis. Bio-medical materials and engineering 13: 373-385.
3. Eshel H, Lanir Y, (2001) Effects of strain level and proteoglycan depletion on preconditioning and viscoelastic responses of rat dorsal skin. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 29: 164-172.
4. Oomens CWJ, Van Campen DH, Grootenboer HJ, (1987) A mixture approach to the mechanics of skin. Journal of Biomechanics 20: 877-885.
5. Escoffier C, De Rigal J, Rochefort A, Vasselet R, Leveque J-L, et al. (1989) Age-related mechanical properties of human skin: An in vivo study. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 93: 353-357.
6. Daly CH, Odland GF, (1979) Age-related changes in the mechanical properties of human skin. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 73: 84-87.
7. Krueger N, Luebberding S, Oltmer M, Streker M, Kerscher M, (2011) Age-related changes in skin mechanical properties: a quantitative evaluation of 120 female subjects. Skin research and technology 17: 141-148.
8. Whitton J, (1973) New values for epidermal thickness and their importance. Health Physics 24: 1-8.
9. Smalls LK, Randall Wickett R, Visscher MO, (2006) Effect of dermal thickness, tissue composition, and body site on skin biomechanical properties. Skin research and technology 12: 43-49.
10. Lanir Y, Fung YC, (1974) Two-dimensional mechanical properties of rabbit skin - II. Experimental results. Journal of Biomechanics 7: 171-182.
11. Martin PG (2000) Properties of human skin United States - Virginia: University of Virginia.
12. Kang G, Wu X, (2011) Ratchetting of porcine skin under uniaxial cyclic loading. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 4: 498-506.
13. Daly CH, (1982) Biomechanical properties of dermis. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 79: 17s-20s.
14. Ananthaswamy HN, Loughlin SM, Cox P, Evans RL, Ullrich SE, et al. (1997) Sunlight and skin cancer: Inhibition of p53 mutations in UV-irradiated mouse skin by sunscreens. Nature Medicine 3: 510-514.
15. Wolnicka-Glubisz A, De Fabo E, Noonan F, (2013) Functional melanocortin 1 receptor Mc1r is not necessary for an inflammatory response to UV radiation in adult mouse skin. Experimental dermatology 22: 226-228.
16. Wellnitz SA, Lesniak DR, Gerling GJ, Lumpkin EA, (2010) The regularity of sustained firing reveals two populations of slowly adapting touch receptors in mouse hairy skin. Journal of neurophysiology 103: 3378-3388.
17. Zimmermann K, Hein A, Hager U, Kaczmarek JS, Turnquist BP, et al. (2009) Phenotyping sensory nerve endings in vitro in the mouse. Nature protocols 4: 174-196.
18. Koltzenburg M, Stucky CL, Lewin GR, (1997) Receptive properties of mouse sensory neurons innervating hairy skin. Journal of neurophysiology 78: 1841-1850.
19. Wetzel C, Hu J, Riethmacher D, Benckendorff A, Harder L, et al. (2007) A stomatin-domain protein essential for touch sensation in the mouse. Nature 445: 206-209.
20. Kwan KY, Glazer JM, Corey DP, Rice FL, Stucky CL, (2009) TRPA1 modulates mechanotransduction in cutaneous sensory neurons. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 29: 4808-4819.
21. Li L, Rutlin M, Abraira VE, Cassidy C, Kus L, et al. (2011) The functional organization of cutaneous low-threshold mechanosensory neurons. Cell 147: 1615-1627.
22. Plikus M V, Chuong C-M, (2008) Complex hair cycle domain patterns and regenerative hair waves in living rodents. The Journal of investigative dermatology 128: 1071-1080.
23. Plikus M V, Mayer JA, De la Cruz D, Baker RE, Maini PK, et al. (2008) Cyclic dermal BMP signalling regulates stem cell activation during hair regeneration. Nature 451: 340-344.
24. Plikus M V, Widelitz RB, Maxson R, Chuong C-M, (2009) Analyses of regenerative wave patterns in adult hair follicle populations reveal macro-environmental regulation of stem cell activity. The International journal of developmental biology 53: 857-868.
25. Müller-Röver S, Handjiski B, Van der Veen C, Eichmüller S, Foitzik K, et al. (2001) A comprehensive guide for the accurate classification of murine hair follicles in distinct hair cycle stages. The Journal of investigative dermatology 117: 3-15.
26. Foster CA, (1987) Differential effects of tissue processing on human embryonic and fetal skin. The Anatomical record 218: 355-358.
27. Crichton ML, Donose BC, Chen X, Raphael AP, Huang H, et al. (2011) The viscoelastic, hyperelastic and scale dependent behaviour of freshly excised individual skin layers. Biomaterials 32: 4670-4681.
28. Crichton ML, Chen X, Huang H, Kendall MAF, (2013) Elastic modulus and viscoelastic properties of full thickness skin characterised at micro scales. Biomaterials 34: 2087-2097.
29. Battaglia TC, (2005) GDF-5 deficiency alters stress-relaxation properties in mouse skin. Journal of dermatological science 39: 192-195.
30. Wang Y, Marshall KL, Baba Y, Lumpkin EA, Gerling GJ (2013) Natural variation in skin thickness argues for mechanical stimulus control by force instead of by displacement. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE World Haptics Conference. Daejeon, Korea. pp. 4-9.
31. Serrat MA, Vinyard CJ, King D, (2007) Alterations in the mechanical properties and composition of skin in human growth hormone transgenic mice. Connective tissue research 48: 19-26.
32. Holzapfel G (2000) Nonlinear solid mechanics: A continuum approach for engineering.
33. Kent RW, Woods WA, Salzar RS, Damon AM, Bass CR, (2009) The transient relationship between pressure and volume in the pediatric pulmonary system. Journal of biomechanics 42: 1656-1663.