What reviewers want: How to make your article more appealing to peer reviewers

Health Psychology Review

Volumn 7, Issue SUPPL1, 2013, Pages

  Hagger, Martin S ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879161537     PISSN: 17437199     EISSN: 17437202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2013.782963     Document Type: Editorial

References (22)

1. Beaudoin, M. -N. and Zimbardo, P. G. 2012. A medical issue affecting the diagnosis of mood, attention and autistic disorders: A closer look at celiac disease and gluten sensitivity. Health Psychology Review, 6: 222 - 240. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.545514
2. Cromby, J. 2011. Affecting qualitative health psychology. Health Psychology Review, 5: 79 - 96. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.544637
3. DiMatteo, M. R., Haskard-Zolnierek, K. B. and Martin, L. R. 2012. Improving patient adherence: A three-factor model to guide practice. Health Psychology Review, 6: 74 - 91. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.537592
4. Dodd, L. J. and Forshaw, M. J. 2010. Assessing the efficacy of appearance-focused interventions to prevent skin cancer: A systematic review of the literature. Health Psychology Review, 4: 93 - 111. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.485393
5. Dombrowski, S. U., Sniehotta, F. F., Avenell, A., Johnston, M., MacLennan, G. and Araújo-Soares, V. 2012. Identifying active ingredients in complex behavioural interventions for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: A systematic review. Health Psychology Review, 6: 7 - 32. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.513298
6. Gibbons, F. X., Kingsbury, J. H., Gerrard, M. and Wills, T. A. 2011. Two ways of thinking about dual processing: A response to Hofmann, Friese and Wiers (2008). Health Psychology Review, 5: 158 - 161. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.541823
7. Glass, D. C. and Contrada, R. J. 2012. Bipolar disorder, Type A behaviour and coronary disease. Health Psychology Review, 6: 180 - 196. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.531568
8. Hagger, M. S. 2012a. How to get your article rejected. Stress and Health, 28 (4): 265 - 268. doi: 10.1002/smi.2458
9. Hagger, M. S. 2012b. What makes a 'good' review article? Some reflections and recommendations. Health Psychology Review, 6: 141 - 146. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2012.705556
10. Hagger, M. S. and Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. 2009. Assumptions in research in sport and exercise psychology. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10 (5): 511 - 519. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.01.004
11. Hagger, M. S., Conner, M. T. and O'Connor, D. 2013. Response to Peters, Abraham, and Crutzen (2012) from the EHPS journal editors. European Health Psychologist, 15: 6 - 7. Retrieved from http://www.ehps.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=295&Itemid=323
12. Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C. and Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. 2009. The strength model of self-regulation failure and health-related behavior. Health Psychology Review, 3: 208 - 238. doi: 10.1080/17437190903414387
13. Hofmann, W., Friese, M. and Wiers, R. W. 2011. Impulsive processes in the self-regulation of health behaviour: Theoretical and methodological considerations in response to commentaries. Health Psychology Review, 5: 162 - 171. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2011.565593
14. McEachan, R. R. C., Conner, M., Taylor, N. J. and Lawton, R. J. 2011. Prospective prediction of health-related behaviors with the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5: 97 - 144. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.521684
15. Peters, G. -J. Y, Abraham, C. and Crutzen, R. 2012. Full disclosure: doing behavioural science necessitates sharing. European Health Psychologist, 14: 77 - 84. Retrieved from http://www.ehps.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=293&Itemid=324
16. Smith, J. A. 2011a. Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5: 9 - 27. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.510659
17. Smith, J. A. 2011b. Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis: A reply to the commentaries and further development of criteria. Health Psychology Review, 5: 55 - 61. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.541743
18. Stavri, Z. and Michie, S. 2012. Classification systems in behavioural science: Current systems and lessons from the natural, medical and social sciences. Health Psychology Review, 6: 113 - 140. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2011.641101
19. Stephens, C. 2011. Narrative analysis in health psychology research: Personal, dialogical and social stories of health. Health Psychology Review, 5: 62 - 78. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.543385
20. Taylor, N., Conner, M. and Lawton, R. 2012. The impact of theory on the effectiveness of worksite physical activity interventions: A meta-analysis and meta-regression. Health Psychology Review, 6: 33 - 73. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.533441
21. Thoolen, B., de Ridder, D. and van Lensvelt-Mulders, G. 2012. Patient-oriented interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in respiratory tract infections: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 6: 92 - 112. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2011.552061
22. Virués-Ortega, J., Pastor-Barriuso, R., Castellote, J. M., Población, A. and de Pedro-Cuesta, J. 2012. Effect of animal-assisted therapy on the psychological and functional status of elderly populations and patients with psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 6: 197 - 221. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.534965