Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis: A reply to the commentaries and further development of criteria

Health Psychology Review

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 55-61

  Smith, Jonathan A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952793842     PISSN: 17437199     EISSN: 17437202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2010.541743     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Chamberlain, K. (2011). Troubling methodology. Health Psychology Review, 5, 48-54.
2. de Visser, R., & Smith, J.A. (2006). Mister in between: A case study of masculine identity and health-related behaviour. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 685-695.
3. Flowers, P., Smith, J.A., Sheeran, P., & Beail, N. (1997). Health & romance: Understanding unprotected sex in relationships between gay men. British Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 73-86.
4. French, D.P., Maissi, E., & Marteau, T.M. (2005). The purpose of attributing cause: Beliefs about the causes of myocardial infarction. Social Science and Medicine, 60, 1411-1421.
5. Kaptein, A.A., (2011). Pick up the pieces and go home - on the demise of health psychology. Health Psychology Review, 5, 39-47.
6. Shaw, R.L. (2011). Celebrating the achievements and preparing for the challenges ahead in IPA research. Health Psychology Review, 5, 28-33.
7. Smith, J.A. (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology & Health, 11, 261-271
8. Smith, J.A. (2011). Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5, 9-27.
9. Smith, J.A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage.
10. Todorova, I. (2011). Explorations with interpretative phenomenological analysis in different socio-cultural contexts. Health Psychology Review, 5, 34-38.